And his liabilities statements for 2014-2017 (each is filed in May the following year; value code J = $15,000 or less, and value code K = $15,000-$50,000):
2014: Kavanaugh has 1 credit card with a balance; it’s less than $15k.
2015: 2 cards with balances, each less than $15k.
2016: 3 cards with balances, each between $15k and $50k.
2017: The trend of escalating short term borrowing evaporates. all his credit card debt is gone.
Let’s look at the previous four years.
2010: 3 card balances, each <$15k
2011: 3 card balances, each <$15k
2012: 3 card balances, 2 of them <$15k and 1 between $15k - $50k
2013: 1 card balance between $15k - $50k
Think we need four more years? Let’s do four more years.
2006: 3 card balances, between $15k - $50k
2007: 3 card balances, between $15k - $50k
2008: 4 card balances, two <$15k and two between $15k - $50k
2009: 4 card balances, each <$15k
Kavanaugh had been spreading out what appears to have been a roller coaster balance of revolving debt across up to four credit cards from 2006 until 2016, presumably paying a ton of interest along the way. Then last year it all disappeared. Does that sound like a baseball story?
Another question: If Kavanaugh was in fact reimbursed for a large baseball-related expense (between $45k and $150k?) in 2017, shouldn’t that be reported in the 2017 report’s reimbursements section?
Here are some supplemental entries to the reimbursements section for the 2017 report, again showing nothing Nationals related.
Also notable, Kavanaugh says the $15k-50k TSP (Thrift Savings Plan) loan “has now been paid in full.” He has had that loan outstanding since 2006.
According to guidance on the judiciary’s website, credit card debt isn’t required to be disclosed unless it exceeds $10k on a per account basis. So each of those “<$15k” credit card entries from Kavanaugh above likely represents at least a $10k liability. uscourts.gov/sites/default/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A couple months ago I did a radio interview for The Truce and the conservative host asked me whether the (then upcoming) Trump trial would lead to people no longer doing business in New York, and I tried to be accommodating and say maybe some die-hard Trump Republicans you know..
But he pressed the point and demanded I take politics out of it. And I told him that these are very common cases and every NY lawyer like me will advise someone setting up a business that they should respect the formalities of its separate existence, keep accurate books, etc.
It appears the Special Counsel’s office filed under seal its support for a Garcia hearing to evaluate Walt Nauta’s lawyer’s alleged conflicts, and Judge Cannon has decided to have it out in public.
The issue is that discussing Stanley Woodward’s representation of three potential witnesses in the secret documents case would reveal the fact of their grand jury testimony. Cannon has decided in a conclusory line that isn’t reason enough, but it’s not clear why she thinks so.
It’s also kinda weird to strike not only the proposed sealed supplement but also the motion for leave to file under seal from the docket. Cannon has denied that motion, which presumably might be an appealable issue, but then excised what she denied from the record. Strange.
By popular request, I will try to explain. According to the govt’s motion, they proposed a protective order, Trump responded with an entirely different form, and then the govt came back with a form based on a case before Judge Nichols.
Transactional lawyers like myself call this the battle of the forms. You just keep sending each other different templates for an agreement, and consequently you delay the work of marking up the other side’s language and isolating the substantive issues between you.
What I find lamentable about DeSantis’s curriculum is the strong echo of antebellum pro-slavery ideology it contains, apportioning credit to the slaveholders and the slave system for supposedly improving enslaved people. I’ll explain.
The chattel slavery practiced in the southern states and the colonies before them was a hideously cruel cradle-to-grave form to bondage. The contemporaneous pro-slavery ideology held that slaveholders were civilizing and improving a savage race from a state of pagan incivility.
The historical record reveals this pro-slavery ideology to be nonsense. Enslaved peoples were the bearers of their own traditions and evidently resourceful and innovative without the intervention of the enslavers, and often to their great frustration.