I guess it just slipped the sources' mind.
My BS detector is going off.
Goodness or badness has nothing to do with this. If somebody USED Tucker Carlson to spread a fake story all over the media, then that's what happened.
If all Tucker had was a single source for this info, and the info was bad, he's a big boy.
His being a good guy or bad guy is irrelevant. He does an important, highly visible job. He needs to get it right.
If this info turns out to be wrong/fake, people need to be held accountable.
Nobody gets a pass. Learn from mistakes, then do better.
I'm now being told Carlson had MULTIPLE SOURCES for this story.
As if somehow that makes it better.
Then his multiple sources finally got around to telling him this info.
AT least two.
Depending on how many sources Carlson actually had for this immunity story.