Moving all the old Physics factlects to the same hashtag to make easier to find them. As Twitter does not allow me to edit my tweets, I need to repost all of them. Apologies if this floods your timeline.
#Physicsfactlet (1)
The uncertainty principle is not a principle, it is a theorem. Just like the Pauli exclusion principle and many others. It was a principle when it was first formulated, but we have since realised that it can be derived from first principles.
#Physicsfactlet (2)
There is nothing quantum in describing particles as waves. In fact one can rewrite the whole Newtonian mechanics as a wave theory without changing any result or prediction. (See Hamilton-Jacobi formalism)
#Physicsfactlet (3)
For statistical mechanics (a classical theory) to be consistent with thermodynamics (a classical theory) you need to consider particles to be indistinguishable from each other, a very quantum assumption. Otherwise you incur in Gibbs' paradox.
#Physicsfactlet (4)
Energy conservation is a direct consequence of the fact that the law of Physics do not change with time. In a universe where the law of nature (e.g. the value of some fundamental constant) change, energy would not be conserved.
#Physicsfactlet (5)
Bell's inequality experiments do NOT rule out nonlocal hidden variables interpretations of QM (e.g. Bohmian mechanics). The only real problem anyone ever found with hidden variable theories is that it is difficult to make a quantum field theory out of them.
#Physicsfactlet (6)
The refractive index is an emergent property due to the scattering of light from each and every atom/molecule forming the material. All the scattered waves interfere destructively except for a forward (slower) one. (See the Ewald–Oseen extinction theorem)
#Physicsfactlet (7)
Perfect crystals are a thermodynamic impossibility. At finite temperature the Helmholtz free energy is minimised for a positive amount of entropy, resulting in a crystal with defects of some kind as soon as you are above zero Kelvin.
#Physicsfactlet (8)
In classical electrodynamics two different electric fields overlap without interacting, and the result is just the sum of the two. But in quantum electrodynamics two photon can scatter from each other via a fermion loop, withut any medium to mediate it.
#Physicsfactlet (9)
To see a rainbow you need the sun behind you and mist or clouds in front of you. If the condition are ok you can see a second rainbow around the first one. The third rainbow is the one you never see, because it is actually behind your back, toward the sun.
#Physicsfactlet (10) #Photon is one of the most misused words in Physics. A photon is a quantum of excitation of a mode of the em field. A photon is NOT a little ball of energy zipping around. A more authoritative discussion on the topic can be found at link.springer.com/article/10.100…
#Physicsfactlet (11)
There is no good fundamental reason we know of why the inertial mass and the gravitational mass of a body should be the same. But all the empirical evidence we have tells us they are, and the direct consequence of this fact is General Relativity.
#Physicsfactlet (12)
There are only two central potentials that guarantee that all bound orbits are also closed: the harmonic and the 1/r potential (Bertrand's theorem). Which means that if gravity was even a bit different, the solar system would be a strange place indeed.
#Physicsfactlet (13)
Sound waves (at least in the audible range) are scalar waves.
Electromagnetic waves are vector waves.
But gravitational waves are tensor waves.
#Physicsfactlet (14)
Charged black holes can have two horizons. An outer event horizon (like all other black holes), and another horizon inside, concentric with the first one.
#Physicsfactlet (15)
In QM the standard way to insure an Hamiltonian has real eigenvalues (i.e. it describes a system with real energy) is to force it to be Hermitian. But technically also a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian would have the same property.
#Physicsfactlet (16)
In QM there are potential barriers that actually do not reflect the wavefunction at all, independently from the energy of the particle (i.e. it is not a tunneling effect). The most famous is the Pöschl–Teller potential, but there are infinite others.
#Physicsfactlet (17)
There is such a thing as negative temperature (e.g. -10K). It happens when enough of the available energy levels are excited that increasing the system energy actually decreases its entropy. Interestingly -10K in not colder than +10K, but MUCH hotter.
#Physicsfactlet (18)
The human eye is more sensitive than any camera, and in the appropriate conditions, is able to detect single photons.
#Physicsfactlet (19)
Schrödinger equation is often presented as falling out of the blue sky to QM students, but it is easy to justify. Just take the dispersion relation of a free particle, make a Fourier transform and add the potential like you would for the Helmoltz equation.
#Physicsfactlet (20)
Noether's theorem connects symmetries and conserved quantities (e.g. translational invariance -> momentum conservation). There is no general equivalent for discrete symmetries, BUT for some of them the theorem works even if it shouldn't (e.g. parity).
#Physicsfactlet (21)
(Math edition)
There is an uncountable infinity of real numbers, but only a countable infinity of algorithms to compute a number to an arbitrary precision in a finite time. Hence, there is an uncountable infinity of numbers that can not be computed.
#Physicsfactlet (22)
Usually you see only the upper half of a rainbow, but if you are on a plane or a tall mountain, sometimes you can see the full circle (known as a "glory halo")
#Physicsfactlet (23)
Between classical correlations and entanglement, there is a huge family of correlations, known as "quantum discord", that are definitively not classical, but also not quantum enough to violate Bell's inequality.
#Physicsfactlet (24)
Special relativity imposes a limit on how fast information can propagate to satisfy causality, which means that wave energy velocity has to be equal or smaller than c. But both phase and group velocity can be as high as you want with no problem.
Obviously the real story of how Schrödinger arrived there is a lot less linear and full of false steps than this. For a discussion of the real story see e.g. mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P437…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#TheLongRoadToLearnSomethingNew
I decided it is high time I learn something about machine learning. I couldn't care less about learning how to use Tensorflow or any other package that do machine learning for you. I "just" want a Physicist's intuition for how and why it works.
1/
A million years ago I asked here for advices on resources. Some were very good advices, some were not. But I am mow armed with a textbook, and will irregularly update here on my progresses.
2/
I am not very far on my path. I've read a few online resources and (so far) the first 30 pages of this book.
I am aware machine learning is a HUGE topic, so I will begin by concentrating on neural networks (and probably a sub-sub-class of neural networks). 3/
#PhysicsFactlet (308)
There are not many problems in Physics that can be solved exactly, so we tend to rely on perturbation theory a lot. One of the problems with perturbation theory is that infinities have the bad habit of popping up everywhere when you use it.
(A thread 1/ )
If you know anything about Physics you are probably thinking about quantum field theory and all the nasty infinities that we need to "renormalize". But quantum field theory is difficult, so let's look at a MUCH simpler problem: the anharmonic oscillator.
2/
Disclaimer: I can't know how much you (the reader) know about this. For some of you this thread will be full of obvious stuff. For others there will be so many missing steps to be hard to follow. I will do my best, but I apologize with everyone in advance.
3/
In celebration of 10k followers, here is a new edition of "people you should follow, but that (given their follower count) probably you don't".
i.e. people I follow, with <5k followers, non-locked, active, that in my personal opinion you should follow too.
1/
In random order: @LCademartiriLab food, chemistry, architecture, and beauty in general. Trigger warning: strong opinions. @VKValev bit of history of Physics + chiral media @DrBrianPatton social justice in science @alisonmartin57 weaving and bamboo structures
2/
#PhysicsFactlet (299)
Fractional derivatives: a brief tutorial/🧵. If you know some calculus you should be able to follow. If you are a Mathematician (or you like to see things done properly) I advise "Fractional Differential Equations" by I. Podlubny instead 😉
1/
The history of fractional derivatives begins together with the history of the much more common integer-order derivatives, and a number of big names in mathematics worked on it over the centuries.
Afaik, the first to work on the problem was Leibniz himself.
2/
Since differentiating twice a function yields the second derivative, the Marquis de l'Hôpital immediately wondered whether it makes sense to think about an operator which, if applied twice, gave the first derivative, i.e. some sort of derivative of order 0.5
3/
#PhysicsFactlet (283)
Lorentz transformations pre-date Special Relativity. How is that even possible?
A thread.
Trigger warning for typos (hopefully just in the text and not in the equations) and carefree manipulations of equations 😉
1/
The historical route is interesting but complicated, so I will leave that story for someone more qualified to write it. What I want to look at is: how do we get the Lorentz transformations without knowing anything about special relativity?
2/
A requirement we want all physical theories to satisfy is the "principle of relativity", i.e. the fact that the laws of Physics are the same in every frame of reference. Were this not the case, each of us would experience a different universe, making life quite complicated.
3/