Profile picture
André Gagné @profagagne
, 10 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
1/ I was recently asked by James Scaminaci III (@4GWDOTDOTDOT) to comment on this interesting report by Francesca Tripodi, “Searching for Alternate Facts: Analyzing Scriptural Inference in Conservative News Practices”. Here are some of my thoughts.…
2/ Tripodi argues that conservatives apply “practices learned in Bible study… to media interpretation.” (p.6) In other words, conservatives engage in “the same type of close reading that they were taught in Bible study to mainstream media.” (p.3)
3/ Tripodi refers to what she calls the practice of “scriptural inference.” Conservatives “critically interrogate media messages in the same way they approach the Bible, focusing on specific passages and comparing what they read, see, and hear to their lived experiences.” (p.6)
4/ People interviewed by Tripodi say they carefully “do their own research” when it comes to the media; this is what helps them identify “fake news.” Note, however, that for many conservatives, “fake news” often corresponds to the content generated by the mainstream media.
5/ Now, there is some value to the idea of “scriptural inference” if understood as a form of literalism. For example, a pastor insisted that “the language of the law of the separation of church and state” (p.19) was not in the Constitution, questioning the validity of the idea.
6/ The need to find the “precise language” in the Constitution is clearly a form of literalism, and we know that fundamentalist Christians often read the Bible literally. For Tripodi, “scriptural inference” is also found when people criticize the use of words “out of context”.
7/ Some people interviewed did not trust news reports - mainly the mainstream media - which in their estimation took Trump's words “out of context” or “twisted their meaning”. For them, this also constituted what they believed to be “fake news.” (p.22)
8/ Now let's see how things really are. The problem with the way conservatives interrogate and criticize the media or the reading of the Constitution, by insisting on the “precise language” and the “context” is that they rarely apply these rules to their own reading of the Bible.
9/ Many conservatives read the Bible literally but they rarely understand the “precise language” of a text because they either don’t know the original languages (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek) and/or take passage where the “precise language” is found completely “out of context.”
10/ So, in the end, conservatives are also guilty of what they accuse the media of doing; just look at how they decontextualize the Bible. A final note: it's most likely easier to believe in “fake news” when you’ve been living for years in your own "virtual theological reality.”
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to André Gagné
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!