arbed_out Profile picture
Aug 21, 2018 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I'm still mulling over yesterday's one-two punch of Venezuela's devaluation and Iran's Central Bank switching to yuan from USD on it's rate reporting platform.

This AM I re-read this paper from June, about future of the international monetary system, with fresh eyes. (Thread)
High level summary: the authors posit that there are four potential paths the IMS can take, depending on a) whether a systemic crisis serves as a catalyst for change or not (revolutionary vs. evolutionary) and b) whether nation-states will cooperate or compete in either scenario.
If no systemic crisis serves as catalyst, the authors postulate that either a) dollar hegemony will continue (cooperation, first screenshot) or b) competing monetary blocs will spontaneously emerge (competition, second screenshot).
If a systemic crisis *does* serve as a catalyst, then options the authors identify are either a) a new international monetary federation (Bretton Woods II: Electric Bugaloo, first screenshot) or b) 'monetary anarchy', which is about as organized as it sounds (second screenshot).
Why this came to mind after yesterday: what if there's a fifth option? A systemic crisis in emerging market economies - e.g. what Turkey, Venezuela and Iran have been experiencing on a much wider and longer scale - wouldn't necessarily have an effect on developed markets...
I'm starting to consider what happens when option 1b - no crisis, no cooperation - only applies to DM economies, and option 2b - crisis, no cooperation - only applies to emerging market economies.

One thing I'm sure of: the 2b diagram looks more likely today than it did in June.
Caveat lector: It's hard to draw conclusions from three basket case economies - and two of them petro-rentier states under sanctions, no less! - and all of a week's worth of data...
...but like I said, yesterday's news has me re-reading the IASS paper from June 2018 with fresh eyes. Here's the URL if you're into that sort of thing:
publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/es…
TL,DR: what if the future of the international monetary system is already here, and it's just not evenly distributed? (With apologies to @GreatDismal)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with arbed_out

arbed_out Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arbedout

Apr 4, 2022
Inspired by this tweet:

Here's a list of choices ISPs and network operators made back in the '90s and early '00s with unintended consequences that damaged the Internet.

(Mea culpa: I'm one of those operators).
1) As e-mail became popular with residential users, spam delivery volume went through the roof. ISP operators decided best practice would be to filter port 25 (SMTP) so that residential users couldn't host email servers.

This broke so. many. things.
"Clients" and "servers" were meant to describe different programs, running on the same hosts, not hosts themselves.

Blocking residential users from running mail servers bifurcated the Internet into "client hosts" and "server hosts".

Also it didn't fix the spam problem.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 22, 2021
Decentralizing the Internet in a tweet:

Embed details for a fidelity bond and associated list of TLDs in nameserver's SOA record; client resolvers can compare age and amount locked in fidelity bond to decide which NS is authoritative for a given TLD

That's it, that's the tweet
(Whether offering alernatives to the root nameserver is enough to count as 'decentralizing the Internet' is an open question, but it's at least a step in the right direction IMHO.)
Every attempt (that I know of) to compete with current ICANN / IANA root servers - Namecoin, Handshake, OneName, OpenNIC, and so on - ends up running into the land rush problem.

Namely: how do you stop squatters from ruining your new namespace?

Read 7 tweets
Mar 23, 2021
I need to put all of my networking protocol rants into one place for b̶o̶r̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶m̶u̶t̶u̶a̶l̶s̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶d̶e̶a̶t̶h̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶D̶M̶s̶ easy access. Brace yourself:

The CLNP fiasco at the 1992 IAB meeting:

How layering allowed the ARPANet to grow:
Speaking of layering, here's some Gopher vs. HTTP:

Read 9 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Still digesting the #FinCENFiles dump, but going over it so far has helped crystallize something for me:

I don't think the dollar is going to be replaced anytime soon, but I don't have the same kind of confidence in the dollar *system*.
I don't quite grok how dollars can continue to exist without the dollar system.

But I also don't get why Tether trades pari passu to the dollar (even after Bitfinex admitted it was less than 100% reserve backed!)
I don't get why mafiosos continued to trade in Italian Lira well after it was demonetized. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 7 tweets
Oct 3, 2019
You plebs put Abqaiq dead last behind even Ukraine on this poll, so now you get a solid eight bagger on Things I Wish We'd Talk About When We Talk About Oil.
#1: The total amount of oil production is by itself not a useful metric; more important is amount of oil produced per capita.

In 1980 during the glut, the U.S. had ~220 million people and produced ~9 million barrels a day; today it's ~13 million barrels for ~330 million people. Image
#2: Petroleum and crude oil are commodities, but petroleum *products* are not - there's an entire supply chain that sits between raw crude and the products it makes, crafted over decades by the invisible hand of the market. Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 3, 2019
Tell me what you do at $DAYJOB writing software, and I'll tell you what food service industry job you'd be comfortable working at.

Thread!
You work at a nameless Fortune 500 company, churning out updates to the internal homegrown CRM software. You desperately want to leave but you have student loans to pay and this was the first temp-to-hire gig you could find.

You're working at McDonalds, and you effing hate it.
You work at a seed funded startup, desperately churning out code to grab more and more total addressable market share. You declined the Fortune 500 gig cuz you're cooler than that.

You'd be at a "hip" fast-casual spot like QDoba. You think it's better than McDonalds. It's not.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(