Thread by @FrostyTakes

1) We have seen this week what appears to be a new kind of "call to arms" from notable Democrats Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder. They both appear to be calling for agitation, unrest, and in Holder's case: Violence.

2) Hillary, in an interview with CNN, stated, "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about..."

Hillary went on to say that civility can only be restored if the Democrats win back the majority.
bit.ly/2A14fog

3) Eric Holder later said, "When they go low, we go high. No. When they go low, we kick 'em."
foxnews.com/politics/eric-…

4) The problem here is that these two people were Secretary of State and Attorney General. They understand the politics of it. They (ideally) should be the last people to call for civil unrest and violence, right? Their goal should be diplomacy, no matter what.

Hint: It's not.

5) In 2010, Libya began to experience civil unrest. This would later culminate in what is now known as the "Arab Spring". Regular citizens were tired of Gadaffi's authoritarianism, so they began to protest and riot, hoping their voices would be heard.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spri…

6) The term "Arab Spring" first appeared in a January 6, 2011 article in "Foreign Policy" and it was attributed to Obama.
foreignpolicy.com/2011/01/06/oba…

7) There were many parallels drawn between the "Arab Spring" and the "seasonal" styled uprisings that came before it. There was "Springtime of Nations" in 1848 and the "Prague Spring" revolution in 1968.

There was even an "Autumn of Nations" in 1989
iwm.at/transit/transi…

8) Al Jazeera stated that these terms were actually structured around the U.S. strategy of controlling the aims and goals of the movement towards a “Liberal Democracy.”

Sadly, the U.S. funding of these types of revolutions is well known.. Most of it comes from the NED.

9) The NED, or National Endowment for Democracy, is a non-profit "soft-power" organization that has a primary goal of "Promoting Democracy Abroad". Sound vague enough?

Their endowment in 2009 after Obama took office: $135 million dollars. Can you guess where this $$$ came from?

10) If you guessed U.S. Government Agencies and Congressional Appropriations, you would be correct...

What?!?! Yes, Congress funds NED with your tax money. And that tax money is being used to "spread democracy abroad"

What does that mean? Well, let me tell you...

11) Keep in mind that, at the end of 2016, it was the Obama Administration that made the allegations of "Russian Interference" in U.S. elections. That's going to come into play later, so pay attention...

12) In 2004, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez accused the U.S. of staging interventions in Venezuela's upcoming national elections. There were multiple efforts to un-seat Chavez, most of which was funded by the NED.
venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/2033

12) The NED already had operations set up in Venezuela, most likely well before the 9/11 attacks. But their pre-2003 budget was $250,000. By the time 2004 rolled around, they increased that budget to $900,000.

13) Almost all of the $900,000 in that budget went to journalists who were part of a Chavez opposition group. They created echo chambers to criticize the Chavez regime and call for change. This ultimately resulted in a ban of US funding for political groups in Venezuela.

14) Sorry, just realized there are two "12's" in this thread.. Oops. Anyway.. In 2014, during the Obama administration, Venezuela learned that the U.S. was still funding opposition groups inside Venezuela. You know how much NED spent in 2013?

15) The funding from NED and the rest of the collective for 2013 was $7.6 Million dollars. Almost 9 times as much as their 2003 mission. What was this money going towards...? Destabilization.

16) In 2004, the NED also spent $3.4 Million in the Ukraine for “Strengthening Political Institutions” and “Democratic Ideas and Values.”

Yep, you guessed it... They were interfering in an election cycle by inserting money to fund the opposition and "Destabilize"

17) In 2015, Russia effectively banned all non-profits (NED) from operating inside the country, citing interference in their "political agenda". They knew what the U.S. was trying to do with their funding, even if it was going through an intermediary.
bbc.com/news/world-eur…

18) What was interesting (and probably not a coincidence) about all of this is what Obama said on December 6, 2016: "each of us has the universal right to speak your minds and protest against authority; to live in a society that’s open and free..."

19) (Continued) "...that can criticize our president without retribution.”

This was very familiar to some who cited the NED's mission in Russia prior to 2015, which was to delegitimize the Russian Military, which would leave Putin vulnerable to a coup.

20) Where am I going with this? Well, we have to go back to 2011. Good old Hillary was giving a speech in Lithuania. In that speech, she said:

"People deserve to have their voices heard and their votes counted, and that means that they deserve fair, free transparent elections...

21) (Continued) "...and leaders who are accountable to them."
politico.com/story/2016/07/…

22) Surely Hillary Clinton is smart enough to know how skilled Putin was when he was in the KGB (now FSB). Putin was well trained counter-intelligence, which is one of the reasons he knew Hillary was speaking directly about him in that Lithuania Speech in 2011.

23) Putin even said that Clinton's "People deserve to have their voices heard" was a direct call-to-arms for dissidents and oppo-party members to unite for protesting and riots (essentially a coup attempt). PUTIN ACTUALLY SAID THAT...

24) It was later learned that, after Hillary's speech, there were several riots and protests, all accusing the Russian Election system of being corrupt. Think that's a coincidence? No.. That is an operation that was funded by the NED and set into motion by our then Sec of State.

25) Now.. Let's fast forward to November 9, 2016. Hillary Clinton, clad with purple accents and her hubby dressed to match, gives her post-election concession speech. During that speech, camouflaged amongst "thank you's" was a subtle call-to-arms once again...

26) "...I want everybody coming out from behind that and make sure your voices are heard going forward."

This is almost a direct quote from the Lithuania speech and a near identical statement that she gave post-Libya Arab Spring.
cnn.com/2016/11/09/pol…

27) Remember, it was shortly after that Lithuania speech that the NED action was set in motion which caused dozens of protests, riots, and people calling Putin's election "unfair" and "void". Sound familiar?

The other statement is even more disturbing.

28) "...scripture tells us, let us not grow weary of doing good, for in good season we shall reap. My friends, let us have faith in each other, let us not grow weary and lose heart, for there are more seasons to come and there is more work to do.”

29) WTF? Why is she talking about "Seasons" and scripture? Not once in her career has she ever given a speech where she directly quotes an entire passage from scripture like that. Why then? Sure, the election loss was tough and that's possibly the reason... but...

30) I think it's much more sinister. I think that was a call for progressive groups to release funding for civil unrest here at home. I think that's exactly what she did because, shortly after that, we began seeing the protests. They were popping up all over.

31) This is the same exact thing Hillary did in Libya in 2011, with the support of Obama. She gave the same type of speeches (like Lithuania) and the protests and riots began. What she was not able to envision was what would happen when Gadaffi was killed in 2011.

32) After Gadaffi died, there was a power vacuum in Libya. The wrong people seized upon it and took control of the nation. These radical groups would later terrorize the region, despite the attempted intervention of post-Arab Spring U.S. help.

33) So, yeah.. Clinton’s policy in Libya and the NED’s investment ultimately failed the Libyan people and helped create a terror-supporting regime that would later kill four Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.

Understand now?

34) Now that you know what Clinton and Obama were up to, think about what Obama did leading up to the January 2017 Trump Inauguration. He alleged Election Interference by the Russians to try and elect Trump.

Why? He was stoking those flames, baby. Trying make people angry

35) The more anger, the more divide between Left and Right. The more divide, the more galvanization of "groupthink" and echo chambers. This leads to mobilization, protests, riots, violence, mob tactics, looting, Antifa...

Everything we are seeing right now.

36) And apparently, I guess it's not happening quickly enough. Seeing that, Hillary is now openly calling for people to forget civility while Eric Holder is saying "Kick 'em", just one week after a viral video showed a leftist kicking a pro-life demonstrator

37) Now... Do you really think this is all just a coincidence? Do you think that people are that organic when it comes to protesting, signs, and marches?

No way in hell. This is organized talking points meant to inspire violence. It's shameful and it's scary.

38) And it has no place in our Republic. Unfortunately, the people entrusted with trying diplomacy above all else are now openly calling for violent opposition.

I'm not going to say that we need to grab our guns because it's not there yet. I Can only quote General Mattis...

39) END.

@threadreaderapp Unroll please.