Adding insult to injury. The Devosom board will employ non-Hindus to manage the loot. Why should Hindus pay for expense of non-Hindus?
Q1: Why should Govt steal this money?
These offerings are traditionally ploughed back into the Hindu society
The collection from Churches and Mosques are never touched by the Govt.
Q3: Why should Govt loot from only Hindus?
Q4. Why does the atheist govt take over only Hindu temples?
Stop paying Kanikka to temples run by Govt till they find it unprofitable and return to Hindus to manage.
Answer is resounding 'NO'
Does anyone know how many properities does Madurai Meenakshi temple own and what is their market rental and actual rental value?
Best kept secrets
1. Keeping state of good repair of temples, building and other appurtenances.
Means fund can be used for temple related civil work.
2. To meet expenditure of rituals
So board decides how many agarbathi, how much flower etc
a. educational upliftment
b. Social and cultural development
c. economic betterment
'of the Hindu community' towards the end of the sentence may cover 1 to 3c.
Is education the responsibility of the secular govt or Temple fund?
Is Social and cultural development not the responsibility of the Govt?
Is economic betterment not the responsibility of the Govt?
Why should a Hindu pay for it?
How many schools are run for educating poor Hindus given preference, next not so poor and then the rest? NONE Admission is secular
Why is the money not spent on spreading 'Sanatana dharma' ?
Why is the money not spent on the inclusiveness of 'sanatana' as against the other?
Money will not be spent to further Sanatana interest.
I have only restricted to the purpose for which fund can be spent.