According to @ARLnews's 2016-2017 annual salary survey, while there's still a gender pay gap, high-level administration positions at University Libraries have hit/surpassed proportional representation... I think?
1/
1st, source: publications.arl.org/ARL-Annual-Sal…
Specifically, table 18 and table 3b. I'm counting "high-level" as Director, Assoc/Assist. Director, and Branch Head bc that's how ARL grouped them.
1st, total population breakout (excl. law+medical libs): 61.9% women, 38.1% men. 2/
2nd, high-level admin composition are 63.95% women, 36.05% men, meaning men are slightly underrepresented (~2%). BUT, the wage gap still swings in favor of men: the women at the top make $0.90 to $0.98 per man$. The gap is smallest at the top and biggest at the bottom.
3/
Caveat: Director/Associate Director still overrepresented (41.2% and 41.8% resp.), balanced out by Assist. Director & Branch Head (33.3% and 29.6%).
4/
Compared to '05-'06, when men made up 36.7% of total population, and 38.2% of top management. (source: publications.arl.org/ARL-Annual-Sal… Figure 2 and table 18).
HOWEVER, top tier wage wage gap was smaller/nonexistent then, ranging from $1.01 to $0.92 per man$.
5/
Sadly, I couldn't find up-to-date numbers for public libraries because @ALALibrary website's data is almost 20 years old. But I think this is all very interesting, and I'd like to see new numbers (if anyone has access and I'm just not seeing them).
6/
ALL TO SAY: Gender and librarianship is complex, and things are getting better in some ways but worse in others, so we have to keep talking about it & gathering data. We also need to push hard to un-whitewash librarianship IN MEANINGFUL WAYS, because that's still a problem.
7/7
I think a lot about how vital kindness is in librarianship: A THREAD.
I know there's often a lot of bracing when one starts a patron interaction, with good reason: sometimes patrons are jerks. But people - patrons or not - are rarely jerks in a vacuum. Frankly...
... a lot of our patrons come to us carrying trauma that most librarians never have to grapple with.
They're bracing just as hard as we are, or harder since we're people in positions of power & privilege. Likely they've had many bad experiences with folks like us beforehand...
... so when they aren't perfectly kind to us, or (yes, even) jerks, it's because their template of a human that WE fit into corresponds with one that's done them bad in the past.
An importance difference is that at the end of the day, we walk away from the interaction...
Systemic inequality in LIS: a thread of good news and gripes!
I just got my first callback on an application I'd submitted & have an interview next week! 😬 Hilariously, it's the most recent one I submitted (this past Monday!), although perhaps that's unsurprising since it's one of the only non-academic positions I applied for.
I'm super jazzed because I have a personal policy of only applying for jobs I *want* to work at, but I'm also frustrated w/super-long hiring processes for academic positions, which is one of many things that push minorities and men out of librarianship altogether.