I’m going to tweet out a story from the last day of World War I that you won’t believe.
But it really did happen. (1/11)
It begins in April, 1917, when my grandfather, Mel Krulewitch, drops out of Columbia Law School to enlist in the U.S. Marine Corps. He joined up because he saw an ad on a bus that said: “Join the Marines. First to Fight!” (2/11)
Grandpa wasn’t impressed with the motley gang he found at the U.S. Marine Corps recruiting station. “Reality hit him abruptly. His fellow recruits left him aghast. ‘Many of them needed a bath,’ he later recalled.” (3/11)
Things got worse – and more difficult – down at Parris Island. The base wasn’t prepared for so many new recruits. After basic training everyday the new recruits were pressed into labor gangs doing construction & hauling every night (4/11)
So getting to France & war in early 1918 was a relief. Like other Marines, he was eager to go into battle. Then Belleau Wood happened. Here he talks about Belleau Wood combat in a 1964 @BBC documentary (5/11)
He entered Belleau Wood with a company of over 200 men. Here @nytimes (“A First-Class War,” 8 June 1958) describes the ordeal. He made sergeant for being 1 of 11 Marines in his unit to survive the battle (6/11)
Months of combat ensued. Until November 10, 1918, when rumors of an armistice were followed by delivery of hot & delicious meals. Everyone was happy until an officer ordered them to load up – they were attacking the Germans at dawn (7/11)
That day – November 11, 1918 – was Grandpa’s 23rd birthday. He spent the early morning in combat, covering a bridgehead attack while enduring shelling (8/11)
Then it happened: a bomb landed directly in the middle of his company. Everyone knew they were about to die: “Even if cover had been available, none could have reached it in time. Fascinated, immobile, they could only await the end,” he remembered (9/11)
But it was a dud. The German artillery shell didn’t explode. He and the other Marines survived. (10/11)
Just a few hours later, World War I ended. Here’s how it ended for him (from his autobiography, titled, "Now That You Mention It" (1973)) (11/11)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'd like to note something about the wonderful success of @HC_Richardson on Substack: It's not luck & it's not overnight. She works tremendously hard. And she studied composition very closely to become the writer she is.
I think we're all missing those very important points(1/5)
For more than a decade (you could argue: throughout her entire career academic career) she's been almost obsessed with the craft of composition and storytelling. Just read these entries on her old Tumblr about writing (2/5)
Before Substack, she was one of the founders of "We're History" (@werehist ), a publication designed to bring historical context to contemporary issues (disclaimer: I've written for @werehist & am grateful for her editing) (3/5)
Let's count the quotes. By my count, it relays 8 direct (promotional) quotes from people invested in the success of Substack's business model, while only 2 independent critiques by outsiders are quoted.
Bonus points for quoting "Newton, who is a friend of mine…” (2/5)
Does it advance current discussions of Substack? Is it easily distinguished from coverage in @TheVerge@WIRED@VanityFair ? For example: I found @michaelwwaters discussion of "peak newsletter" in @wired more informative than the section relayed in it(3/5)
A personal observation on why colleges staying remote & college football cancellations, might be important politically in the U.S.A.
This is not based on any data, or scholarship that I know of. It's just about conversations I had with my father (1/4)
My father produced "The CBS Evening News" throughout the 1960s. When it came to the anti-war movement, he told me he felt certain *everything* exploded when the deferment rules changed & middle-class college kids suddenly faced the prospect of fighting & dying in Vietnam (2/4)
He told me that was when antiwar protests crossed over, and exploded out of control. It was all about making class suddenly visible. Middle-class college kids with career aspirations had their futures threatened. The tragedy of Vietnam dawned on them & their parents (3/4)
A thread on how anchors like @jaketapper@DavidMuir@NorahODonnell@LesterHoltNBC might revise how they're holding the White House accountable, based on the editorial independence demonstrated by their predecessors in 1979-1980 during the Iran Hostage Crisis (1/7)
They should use clear & easily understood metrics daily. Open and/or close broadcasts with these same accurate and verifiable metrics, and tie them directly to the administration's response to the pandemic. (2/7)
Example: "It's has now been 19 days since President Trump assured the American people 'Anybody that needs a test, gets a test.' The President was wrong then, and there's no evidence that sufficient tests exist today, 19 days later." (3/7)
A thread on how television credibility is built and maintained – and why, as a nation, we’re in a far worse place without a Peter Jennings, Walter Cronkite, or Chet Huntley to inform us. (1/11)
Few realize that broadcast network TV news in 2020 reaches far more viewers than any cable channel. David Muir’s ABC World News Tonight reaches 3x more viewers every day than Fox News in primetime. (2/11)
But as a % of the population, Muir’s reach is a small fraction of Huntley-Brinkley & Cronkite nightly audience. And here’s why that’s important (3/11)