THREAD - On this historic occasion, let us recall some of what was promised specifically on this deal:

“There will be no downside to Brexit, only a considerable upside.”

David Davis
10 October 2016
“Getting out of the EU can be quick and easy – the UK holds most of the cards.”

John Redwood
July 17 2016
“The free trade agreement that we will have to do with the European Union should be one of the easiest in human history.”

Liam Fox
20 July 2017
“We're not really interested in a transition deal, but we'll consider one to be kind to the EU.”

David Davis
15 November 2016

(One of my favourites)
“I believe that we can get a free trade and customs agreement concluded before March 2019.”

David Davis
18 January 2017
“Indeed, [a trade deal] would take significantly less than two years. We hold all the cards. We will offer them a deal in response to their pleas for help.”

Patrick Minford
14 June 2016
“I am not worried about transitional arrangements. I am prepared to take the economic hit to secure the economic benefits of not being inside the Single Market and being outside the Customs Union. I simply want... a quickie divorce.”

Michael Gove
17 November 2016
“We are going to get a deal which is of huge value and possibly of greater value.”

Boris Johnson
16 November 2016
“Within two years, before the negotiation with the EU is likely to be complete, we can negotiate a free trade area massively larger than the EU. The new trade agreements will come into force at the point of exit, but they will be fully negotiated.”

David Davis
14 July 2016
“Trade relations with the EU could be sorted out in an afternoon over a cup of coffee.”

Gerard Batten
17 February 2017
“Within minutes of a vote for Brexit, CEOs would be knocking down Chancellor Merkel’s door demanding access to the British market.”

David Davis
4 February 2016
“The cost of getting out would be virtually nil and the cost of staying in would be very high.”

Boris Johnson
6 March 2016
“I think we could very easily get a better trade deal than we have at the moment.”

Douglas Carswell
8 June 2016
“All David Davis needs to say to is: listen guys free trade or WTO?”

Tim Martin
2 January 2017
"It will be easy to negotiate a trade deal. It's in the EU's interests."

Paul Nutall
17 January 2017
"Nobody ever pretended this would be simple or easy."

David Davis
5 September 2017
And this by David Davis last week deserves pride of place on the thread:

“If we need to leave with no deal and negotiate a free trade agreement during the transition period, so be it.”

Leave with no deal (so no transition period) and negotiate it during the transition period.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Andreou

Alex Andreou Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sturdyAlex

Feb 15
This is such UTTER NONSENSE by Bulford. The whole point, which she is unable or unwilling to grasp, is that the BBC is complicit in giving these entirely opaque orgs the veneer of respectability they crave. It doesn't matter whether their views are challenged (which they're not).
Imagine I launched a private co called The Royal Trust Against Poverty. Would I ever be invited to comment on economic policy? NOT IN A MONTH OF SUNDAYS. And yet The Taxpayers Alliance or the (formerly) Institute of Ideas are precisely the flip-side of that.
The question is not whether the BBC challenges their views. By inviting them on, it de facto signals they have some authority to express them. Has it ever questioned their funding, agenda and reason for being BEFORE deciding whether they deserve a chair?
Read 4 tweets
Jan 19
I applaud Cummings' efforts to remove the PM. But it was under his guidance that Johnson ignored laws, prorogued Parliament, lied to HM, attacked judges, abused the press, lied to voters, sacked civil servants, hired 'misfits' and surrounded himself with a cabinet of fools. 1/4
Knowing - as he claims - that Johnson was a dangerous idiot, a 'faulty supermarket trolley', veering wildly from side to side, it was Cummings that trashed every single constitutional bulwark, designed precisely to keep an errant PM's course broadly straight and true. 2/4
If Johnson is the wrecker, Cummings is the enabler. It was Cummings that ensured 'Big Dog' was off the leash, causing maximum damage.

"It will seem chaotic and ‘not proper No10 process’ to some. But the point of this government is to do things differently", he wrote in 2019. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 6
Jury verdicts do not "set precedent". Seeing as you're so interested in saving your culture and heritage, you might want to open a book.
Aaaaand... "scene". Image
Then again, the same dude wrote this in support of the banning of democratic protest in the policing bill. It ends: "... look at the people around you. And if David Lammy is there, run like hell." @_SaveOurStatues

thecritic.co.uk/the-police-bil…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 16, 2021
More from Mordaunt US speech, suggesting human rights are secondary to trade and boasting UK will ditch regulation on procurement, data, gene editing, medicine, and agriculture.

“You want the prospect of a best-in-class deal on agriculture. Think you will get that from the EU?”
It's basically OPENLY advertising that Britain is now a free-for-all. Alngside offensively patronising advice like "you need to increase your relevance in the Indo-Pacific". No! Really, Penny? Gee, thanks.
These are utterly toxic notions and they are targeted DIRECTLY at the Trump base. The idea that trade with no standards can address corruption and human rights abuses. The idea that the EU stands in the way of Western capitalism fulfilling its destiny, by having RULES.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 9, 2021
THREAD: There is only one issue, in truth, here and I have been writing about it for over a decade. Since Andrew Lansley declared a donation from someone associated to a private healthcare co, WHILE he was Health Secretary. The issue is the notion of "above board". 1/
Politicians, of all ilks and at all levels, are meant to register ourside interests. The purpose of doing so is to make public any potential conflicts. This system, however, has been subverted by the idea that registering an interest somehow magically resolves any conflict. 2/
IT. DOES. NOT.

Politicians in a position to make or influence decisions should not be taking money from ANY entity, in a way that may or even APPEAR to compromise them. An obligation to declare would ensure this didn't happen. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Nov 9, 2021
There are hot takes and then there's Sherelle Jacobs.

Paranoid, McCarthyite, enemy-within dross, with one aim: to excuse those in power; to say that this maelstrom of isolationism, corruption and effluent is not their (or their pom-pom-shakers) fault. The opposite of journalism.
On a day the gov't is neck-deep in a swamp of sleaze, the morning after the PM ran away and left his MPs to defend a decision they were against, to begin with, four days into the Telegraph trying to ignore this story, up pops Sherelle to tell us it's AKTCHULLY all Labour's fault.
And her colleague, Olivia Utley, on Sky News obligingly defending this utter undignified nonsense, and continuing the Telegraph's attack on tHe LiBeRaL eLiTeZ by branding COP26 "a jamboree" and Barack Obama - WAIT FOR IT - "a has-been".
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(