The decreases were biggest in states like California, Florida, and New York.
From 2007 to 2016, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Mexico, South America, the Caribbean, Africa, Europe and Canada fell.
The number from Central America increased, but only by about 300,000 total (over 9 years).
These new numbers prove, yet again, that the Caravan, the families Trump separated, etc. are the tiny last gasp of a phenomenon that mostly ended over a decade ago.
(end)
More data, more facts!
Here's a list of states where the unauthorized immigrant population changed, and how much it changed by, over the last decade.
Some people have tried to estimate the number of unauthorized immigrants that govt. surveys miss, based on entry/exit numbers.
They find a higher total population of unauthorized immigrants, but the same decline - or a BIGGER decline - starting in 2007. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
Deportations peaked in 2013 under Obama, who focused on deporting criminals and recent entrants rather than law-abiding long-term residents.
Unauthorized immigrants are a little less than a quarter of the foreign-born population. They are about 3.3 percent of the entire United States population.
The collapse and reversal of illegal immigration is due mainly to Mexico, though the trend holds for almost all sending countries (Mexico was just by far the biggest).
It's now basically down to just Honduras/Guatemala/El Salvador.
The collapse and reversal of illegal immigration seems to have been triggered by the bursting of the housing bubble in 2007. BUT, thanks to low Mexican fertility and higher Mexican per capita GDP, the trend held even as the economy recovered.
Obama's vigorous border enforcement, with record deportations, family detention (vox.com/2018/6/21/1748… …). and use of force at the border (newsweek.com/obama-administ… …), might also have been a factor in stopping illegal immigration from rebounding after the recession ended.
Looking at the data and the history, I cannot reasonably conclude that illegal immigration should be an important issue in the United States today.
It seems to me to be a nothingburger. A vehicle for posturing, rhetoric, and status politics, not a real policy challenge.
Illegal immigration now seems to me to be nothing more than a symbolic flashpoint in the much larger battle over race and belonging in America - over who gets to be a "real American".
That is a very important battle. But it's not really about illegal immigration.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Here's something a lot of people I talk to don't understand about Japanese urbanism, and why Japanese cities are so special.
2/Japanese cities feel different than big, dense cities elsewhere -- NYC, London, and Paris, but also other Asian cities like Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Singapore.
There are many reasons for this, but today I'll focus on one: Zakkyo buildings.
3/When many people think of "mixed-use development", they think of stores on the first floor, apartments on the higher floors. This is sometimes called "shop-top housing" or "over-store apartments".
This is how most cities in the world do mixed-use development.
1/Here's something I've been wondering about recently: How did the U.S. miss the battery revolution?
With every other technological revolution, we anticipated it well in advance, and as a result we were the first -- or one of the first -- to take advantage of it.
2/The U.S. invented the computer, the internet, and modern AI. On all three of those, we were (or are) the leading nation. We talked ad infinitum about the benefits of those digital technologies long before they became a reality, allowing us to shape their eventual use.
3/We did the Human Genome Project. We invented mRNA vaccines. We did most of the research that drove down the costs of solar power. Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the White House more than 30 years before it became economical.
Russia's empire is a nested hierarchy. At the center is Moscow. Under them are mid-tier Russian cities and rural areas, then subject peoples like the Buryats, Sakha, and these African folks.
The closer you are to the center, the less fighting you do, and the more money you get.
In fact, the circles of Russian hierarchy don't stop at Moscow. There are privileged subgroups of Muscovites, then more privileged groups inside that circle, all the way up to the Tsar himself.
The principle still holds: Closer to the center = less fighting, more money.
The advantage of this organizational structure is that the more power you have, the less likely you are to ever suffer negative consequences from adverse shocks or bad decisions. All the losses from failed wars, bad economic decisions, etc. get taken by the less powerful.
In fact, it's not law even now. This executive order is (sadly) AGAINST the law and will probably be struck down, because our asylum law says we can't discriminate against asylum claimants for crossing the border illegally. That law needs to be changed by Congress.
The problem is that the U.S. is a party to the 1967 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees, which says that your asylum system can't discriminate against people for being in the country illegally. We wrote our domestic law to comply with that treaty.
The non-discrimination provision is obviously stupid, so what we need to do is flout the 1967 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees, and simply amend our domestic law to say "You can't claim asylum if you crossed illegally". But this would require an act of Congress.
About 8% of students have participated in the protests on one side or the other. That's a substantial number, but less than the 21% who joined BLM protests in May/June 2020 (and the latter were pretty much all on one side of the issue).