The thing is about Aaron Bastani is that he's a genius. He knows exactly what to say to piss people off. He knows he can be bigoted, offensive, borderline racist & misogynist & that nobody can touch him. He is in no danger of losing his job or his position of influence with LOTO
He has taken the far-right shock jock model, the kind of thing Katie Hopkins built a career off, and created a pseudo-left wing version of it. It has pushed Novara Media into the spotlight countless times, far more than any of the private school Oxbridge kids they have on there.
So he can praise Nazi command economics, dismiss claims of anti-semitism, endorse Assad supporters, share conspiracy theories and mock disabled veterans knowing that no matter how justifiably angry people get, it only gives him a bigger platform.
Anyone getting angry is just a "centrist melt" and should be laughed at, even when he is perpetuating racist ideas. The more sensible people around him are fully aware of this and are riding his coat tails all the way to every paid TV appearance they can. It's Populism 101.
By the time he was posting photographs of intimidating messages left anonymously on the desks of female MPs and receiving no punishment for it, it was pretty clear to see that senior figures were perfectly comfortable with this behaviour as a form of political campaigning.
What's the answer to this? There is no effective answer besides no-platforming, and he has established his own platform, which makes that very difficult to accomplish. And nobody around him has any desire to stop that gravy train either.
But here's the thing, all of these guys are now fully invested in one man becoming Prime Minister. If that project fails, so do their careers. And if that project fails, and the party changes course, they will find themselves in the same position Militant did in the 80s.
It took a lawsuit and getting fired from every far-right friendly media outlet in the country for Katie Hopkins to finally lose the power of outrage she had weaponised for her political and personal financial gain.
For Bastani, the only thing that will damage his platform is a significant electoral defeat for the candidate he has backed, followed by a change in leadership, to the point that his opinion is no longer seen by the wider public as being representative of the Labour leadership.
On the other hand, if his side sweeps to power, his offensive diatribes move from the position of opposition, to the position of targeting perceived enemies of the state. It's hard to see the funny side of this to be perfectly honest with you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I prefer the painting with the eyes drawn on, there, I said it.
I am always in favour of more stuff like this happening, it's never not funny.
Add his credit to the original painting and move on. I wasn't interested in seeing it before, but you bet I'd pay 5 Euro to see it tomorrow with the googly eyes left on.
In 2012 Seumas Milne wrote that the US government were perpetuating a "falsehood" that the Assad regime was going to use chemical weapons. In 2013 once they finally did use chemical weapons killing 1500 people, Milne dedicated 5 paragraphs to his thoughts on whether rebels did it
The truth is Owen's allies have a long history of actually making excuses for, or even outright defending, catastrophic wars. His entire facade is built around you never knowing that, and gaslighting you into believing otherwise.
Don't believe me? Here's how Owen describes Seumas Milne's words, and here is the actual text that Seumas wrote. Can you see how absurd and farcical this game really is? It requires you to not bother reading anything.
Philip had a nice little flat in West Beirut and he's out here talking like he survived Vietnam.
I know this because I was once in his flat.
Anyway you absolutely do not need to listen to this 'Hands Off Assad' grifter about anything ever, even if he did have a brief little Lawrence of Arabia jaunt in the bougiest parts of the Levant.
I think this hit piece by Novara complaining that The Guardian have hired a journalist who accurately reported on Corbyn's trip to Tunisia should be generating more comment, particularly given that it's based on defending Corbyn from accusations of a thing he admitted doing.
Given Bastani wrote to my boss twice trying to have me sacked, we're in a position where the country's leading Corbynite media outlet seems to be engaged in a personal war to get journalists who accurately reported on their failed political project fired.
"The Guardian should not hire this journalist who exposed the bad lies Corbyn tried to tell after the PR blowback from his visit to Tunisia" is a pretty rancid way for a supposedly left wing outlet to operate, but it's where we are now.
Bastani and co publishing an article the other day lying about the wreath again. Blue tick Corbynites never ever giving up on their betrayal narrative, particularly towards Jewish media figures. It’s repulsive conspiratorial bigotry.
There are countless of these desperate 30-something writers who consider themselves anti-racist progressives who have convinced themselves British Jews coordinated to “fuck over” Corbyn, who apparently did nothing wrong. He didn’t even lay the wreath he admitted laying. Gross.
Read these two tweets side by side about a man who literally once raised money for a Holocaust denier, denied the existence of mass graves in Kosovo and praised the Irianian theocracy for its treatment of religious minorities, and tell me this isn’t a personality cult.