Beatrice Cherrier Profile picture
Dec 21, 2018 18 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/There’s this economist few remember, who wrote the 1st 2-sectors growth model, brought Pontryagin to econ, played rugby w/ Inada, argue over Marxism & Keynes w/ Solow & Kahn, rediscovered Veblen & ended up contributing to a papal encyclical.

His name is Hiro Uzawa (宇沢弘文) Image
2/ A caveat: this is not a historical account, but a summary of Uzawa telling his own story in the wildest MD interview ever

(TBH I also enjoyed this interview because the reluctant interviewer I am can relate so much with things going out of control) https://t.co/ggLIdTMMkHcambridge.org/core/journals/…
Image
3/ Uzawa was born in Japan in 1928, spent his spare time proving Newton’s theorem in middle school, graduated in math, struggled w/ depressed economy, shifted to econ.

Back then, in Japan, your typical econ textbook author was Stalin. Uzawa found it obscure, to say the least Image
4/ One summer, Stanford econ H. Houthakker came to give a course. He was doing what all Stanford econ did in 50s: applying math to study growth & allocation theory.

That’s how Uzawa discovered that though math is contaminated by bourgeois ideology, it can be useful to econ Image
5/ Uzawa wrote to Arrow & Hurwicz that he had read their work “with ardor” (sic) and sent his homework (which happened to be the 1st clear distinction b/w global and local stability in programming). So Arrow invited him right away to Stanford
6/ Uzawa joined the Stanford growth seminar in 1956 and came up w/ a way put Das Kapital in equations: the 2 sectors growth model (w/ cool strictly concave production production frontier). But Solow didn’t seem to get that Uzawa was trying to bring classes in his growth model. Image
7/Since Ramsey, econ had borrowed calculus of variations from engineers to model growth path, but modeling agents as choosing set of actions over time under constraints was tricky: they didn’t know how to handle the time paths of their state & control variables.
Nor could they handle corner solutions (if you need a primer on the history of dynamic growth math, read Sent and Wulwick https://t.co/5wHUd0rc7x)read.dukeupress.edu/hope/article-a…
levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp38.pdf
8/ But they were all working in the new OR dpt of Stanford engineering school, with mathematicians & engineers around. So Sam Karlin suggested that Uzawa check this fancy book by a blind Russian mathematician. Uzawa got it translated and gave it to Cass and Ryder, his students Image
9/ Uzawa got married, rented nice cottage. His landlady happened to be stepdaughter of a famous Stanford econ barred from getting tenured b/c of messy marriage : T. Veblen (). So Uzawa read tons of Veblen, liked his treatment of institutional constraints https://t.co/KuGnqo0gh5stanfordmag.org/contents/the-n…
Image
10/ But Uzawa grew tired of Stanford’s peaceful world, and of feeling “so small” in front of Arrow, so he moved where his dear friend, the local “in house Keynesian” Lloyd Metzler said there was a war to wage: Chicago. Which got Koopmans to tell him “you are a traitor.” Image
11/ He wrote the first human capital accumulation growth model (H is for Human capital, but also Hiro). Hardly gets a mention in interview. Bc at Chicago, there was Friedman. And there is so much to say abt Friedman Also, the Vietnam war has turned the US into a “chaotic mess,” Image
11/ Uzawa thought how about paying a visit to, you know, *real* Keynesians. So he flew to Cambridge, where he met Robinson, who was a kind of “Milton Friedman of the left” (except that “Friedman is logical” and Robinson “philosophical”) Image
12/in fact, he spent most of his time hanging w/ Richard Kahn, (who was much clearer than Keynes), discussing how to model the fact that capital is an institutional entity that adjusts constantly in the production process (if I understood correctly). That was consistent w/ Veblen Image
(Also, Kahn was blaspheming at dinner, which Uzawa enjoyed a lot). Image
13/ By that time, Uzawa had spent 20 years reflecting abt how all sorts of production factors accumulate, from human capital to public goods. He moved back to Japan, and focused on “social common capital” Image
14/In late 1980s, Pope was working on new encyclical abt “the abuses of socialism & the illusions of capitalism” Question was how to transition from former to latter Uzawa saw opportunity to apply Solow meets Keynes meets Veblen, and offered advice. It became Rerum Novarum
/end/ Image
@econoclaste ...de nouveaux facteurs et contraintes de prod, et qu'après avoir fait le malin avec Kuhn-Tucker et Pontryagin, il a passé le reste de sa vie à essayer de prendre en compte le capital social et les contraintes institutionnelles de production à la Veblen.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beatrice Cherrier

Beatrice Cherrier Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Undercoverhist

Jul 6
1/n Pendant cette trêve, vous reprendrez bien un peu d’histoire de la "courbe de Laffer," pour comprendre ce qu’on invoque en citant le nom de cet économiste, et vous préparer ainsi au chaos de ces prochains mois ?

(cette fois, c’est long)

1974 : Arthur Laffer dine avec... Image
2/n ...Donald Rusmfeld, Dick Cheney & Grace Arnett, membres de l’équipe du président Ford, & Jude Wanniski, journaliste au Wall Street Journal.

Laffer, universitaire qui aspire à une carrière politique. Laffer explique qu’une baisse des impôts peut s’auto-financer parce qu'..
...elle peut augmenter les recettes fiscales. Laffer fait à peu près le dessin ci-dessous sur une serviette de table

(laquelle est Smithonian Museum, mais son authenticité est contestée. Laffer ne se souvient pas du diner, Wanniski, Arnett et Cheney si) nytimes.com/2017/10/13/us/…
Image
Read 26 tweets
Jun 19
Ce genre de paragraphe est dangereux, car il transfère l’équivalence de Macron entre RN et FP au champ de l’économie universitaire.

Or il y a une différence de NATURE entre les débats sur les programmes eco LR/Macron/FP et ceux sur le programme FN 1/n Image
Dans le 1er cas, il y a des désaccords profonds, souvent anciens, entre les ecos qui soutiennent les programmes présentiels, LR et NFP. Ils portent sur :

1. les données : par exemple quel est le niveau et l’évolution des inégalités, de la pauvreté, de la productivité en France
2. la modélisation : quelles sont les conséquences théorique et empiriques de ↗️ de l’endettement, l'↗️ des impôts sur les inégalités et les mouvements de capitaux, l’↗️ du salaire minimum sur l’emploi et les profits, la réforme des allocations chômage sur l’emploi et la pauvreté
Read 12 tweets
Mar 28
Did econs make these assumptions because they believed them true?

-what were Arrow vs Debreu's goals?
-how Coase vs later users viewed transaction costs
-how many assumptions stuck for tractability reasons? press.princeton.edu/books/hardcove…
aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…
journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/14116
Did the rise of experiment challenge these assumptions, then? and

Whatever happened to those economists modeling disequilibrium? and tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
abebooks.com/9781107023192/…
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
and a lot more history references in the threads below from my Bachelor course:

Should economic model be realistic:

What's the status of the rationality assumption:

Read 4 tweets
Aug 8, 2023
The art of writing an abstract Image
(with a hatchet)
Okay, you're taking this ways too seriously. I tweeted this because I envied the sharp title and the privilege of writing a sharp "pissed" abstract, something I could never do. A serious read shows that the 5-pages paper doesn't deliver, and a historian's read would point that..
Read 6 tweets
May 28, 2023
It's harder than I thought to find studies of friendships in the history of econ, but a few random thoughts:

friendships relies on mutual trust and respect, which in turns create intellectual space for disagreement

(Simon on Marschak below) screenshot of a citation fr...
most discussions of friendships, while not delving into their consequences on science, emphasizes fair criticism

(Arrow on Samuelson, and Friedman on Stigler below) ImageImage
when balance is broken, friendship sours and collaboration might become impossible

(I didn't know that Kahneman and Tversky eventually broke up over how to respond to Gigerenzer)

from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Undoi… ImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
May 25, 2023
Rawls and the econmists: the (im)possible dialogue.

Super cool paper by Herrade Igersheim
cairn.info/revue-economiq… Image
Igersheim shows that economists initially expressed enthusiasm when the Theory of Justice came out: Image
...but many quickly emphasized that they had a problem with Rawls' treatment of risk in the TJ (here Cooter and Arrow). Other trivialized his theory as a special case of utilitarianism ImageImage
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(