Profile picture
To The Republic @sliderblaze2
, 12 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
1. This may be the dumbest thread I've seen all week. This doesn't refute anything .@paulsperry_ even said in his article. It Claims sources are anonymous when they're actually named & touches on only one subject specifically to try and prove he's wrong.
2. Sorry, thats not how it works, law enforcement doesn't ignore witnesses when building a case. They take on all comers & sort through who's needed & who's not. The fact that they haven't been contacted at all and some
3. just recently, Nov 30th after 8 month and 3 submissions of evidence later. YOU are assuming, wrongly, that a prosecutor who is serious would ignore them. That's not just pauls take, thats meadows AND the CF whistleblowers take
4. You say that the sources are anonymous... ugh, where? Even the article you cite, says that quote came from Mr Campbells attorney who we all know by now is Toensing. We heard the same from Page the same about the Ohrs, Braverman etc, etc.
5. now i know this gets all you hype accounts all fired up, but lets actually look at the facts at play. This case is about a trucking company who bribed other companies to do transport. Nothing about the kickbacks to the clintons for approval of the sale.
6. nothing about the exporting of the uranium over seas. Just like yall hype up. BUT SEARCH WARRANTS, which is SOP when more than one entity is involved in the crime. So no shit Tenex was searched... THEY WERE THE ONE GETTING THE KICKBACKS.
7. This really isn't that hard to understand. While YOU and the other charlatans always hype shit up... the reality is in the 13 month Huber has been appointed not one indictment, 1 criminal referral for McCabe for lying about leaking, nothing to do with spygate.
8. Now i know the other charlatan Draw & Strike hyped that up but again, he was way off base. Now you say... but the real truth is THEY are frustrated as they even stated, They are interested in truth and justice but the law enforcement, FBI, DOJ is not
9. How do we know this... only the most important exchange of the whole testimony that ya'll seem to want to ignore cus it undercuts your whole argument
10. Now lets go back to Huber. In 13 months we have 1 IG report, 1 criminal referral in the time Mueller had 36 indictments encompassing 100 charges. Now I'll ask the logical question that Meadows asked, does this sound like a prosecutor who is serious?
11. Hell no, and no amount of threads ya'll do is going to change that FACT. No amount of contrived "see, there is evidence" is going to change that fact. Because that evidence isnt what you claim it is. Paul is spot on. Now when you see those associates of the clintons..
12 start to get indicted on the crimes they will be testifying against them with... Then an only then will you actually have evidence of movement... everything else you are all spinning and cooking up is just bs.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to To The Republic
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!