Some people have shown interest once again in Benghazi, to me this tragedy is still very important. I'm not talking about Susan Rice hitting the Sunday Morning circuit lying about the attack, however it is important but all the things leading up to Benghazi, & why they were there
On July 25, 2012 Taliban fighters in Kunar province Afghanistan successfully targeted a US Army CH-47 helicopter with a new generation Stinger missile. The terrorists didn't properly arm the missile, so it didn't explode, it only downed the chopper. #Benghazi
The next day, an EOD team arrived to pick through the wreckage and found unexploded pieces of a missile casing that could only belong to a new generation Stinger missile. Lodged in the right nacelle, they found one fragment that contained an entire serial number.
The Stinger tracked back to a lot that had been signed out by the CIA part of the same lot the CIA turned over to the ­Qataris in early 2011, weapons Hillary Clinton’s State Department intended for anti-Qaddafi forces in Libya through a contact of John McCain named Marc Turi.
Turi threatened to spill the beans when the CIA started coming after him wanting answers, and they framed him up on a bogus weapons charge, and tried to ruin him. People are asking who is Marc Turi, well meet Marc Turi...
Marc Turi is from Phoenix AZ and was a neighbor of John McCain. McCain who has been on the Senate Arms Committee for years helped Turi secure billions in arms contracts with the DoD. Then Clinton and McCain came up with a plan to arm Al-Qaeda to get them to overthrow Qaddafi
Things got out of hand and went south quickly. Don't know what ace in the hole Marc Turi that kept him alive, but it must be good, because in Obama's last few days in office, they dropped all charges on Turi and he walked on all the charges.
It's nothing new for us to arm bad guys it's been done many times, just ask Ollie North. But it's usually a CIA effort but they opposed the idea from the very beginning because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
But HRC had a big pay day coming and could care less, she never flew commercial anyway. Clinton still wanted to proceed because she wanted to overthrow Qaddafi on the cheap...
Those containers in Qatar that were diverted on the docks from Turi's shipment delivered between 50 and 60 of those same Stingers to the Taliban in early 2012, and an additional 200 SA-24 Igla-S SAMs.
now HRC put Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens, Sean Smith; CIA contractors Tyrone Woods & Glen Doherty
Immediately HRC tried to use the cover story on why they were attacked than fell flat on it's face. Susan Rice hit the Sunday shows with the spontaneous protest because of a video story, that blew up in their faces.
Most people ignored the Benghazi hearings thinking it was all about the lying on whether or not the attack originated about a damn video, that's all the MSM wanted to talk about. No it was about why in the hell was Stevens even in Benghazi in the first place.
What's the desperate need to send him into a hostile unstable situation diplomacy? In Benghazi? We had no boots on the ground, only CIA contractors monitoring the situation there. Stevens showing up to set up a makeshift embassy in a virtually non secure facility for what?
The spread the voice of freedom & goodwill? BS! Wikileaks blew the lid off of it and people started connecting the dots. HRC was neck deep in illegal arms dealing to our enemies, Fast & Furious on the international scale. McCain/HRC were scapegoating Turi to cover their tracks
Chris Stevens became the official U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition. He first entered Benghazi on April 5, 2011, joined by a USAID team, USAID team? How about some damn Marines? Who was neck deep in USAID and still are to this day? The Clinton Foundation.
In the 13 hr standoff in Benghazi multiple stand down orders from HRC, Response teams changing in and out of uniforms multiple times, U.S. Sec officer Eric Nordstrom twice requested additional security for the mission in Benghazi from the State Dept but requests were denied.
State Dept official Charlene Lamb said she wanted to keep the security presence in Benghazi "artificially low" to not draw attention to why they were really there. Surplus funds originally earmarked for use in Iran were redirected & obligated for use in Benghazi to buy stingers
U.S. Army commando unit was sent to Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy the night of the attack but did not deploy to Benghazi. State Dept claimed the team did not arrive at Sigonella until after the attack was over. Only later did we find out that was a lie too
Diplomatic Security Service agents/Regional Security Officers informed their headquarters in DC about the attack just as it was beginning at about 9:40 p.m. local time (3:40 p.m. Eastern Time (ET)). At the time, they were informed that the attack was a "terrorist attack"
By 4:30 p.m. ET, Pentagon officials had informed Leon Panetta about the attack. The Pentagon ordered a drone that was in the air conducting surveillance on militant camps to fly over Benghazi. So instead of sending commandos the sent a drone with a camera
After a 13 hr standoff, why did it take 23 days to allow the FBI investigators in to gather forensics? What were they hiding at the State Dept.? Where were all the official communications? The emails, better yet where are the Stingers and the balance of the SA-24s?
Knowing their cover is blown, the State Dept went after Turi pointing fingers at him trying to frame him for supplying the Taliban with weapons illegally. But Wikileaks emails revealed communications where HRC was seeking small 10 container unmarked vessels to move the sea cans
Here's 1651 emails in this sort that connect Clinton to al-Qaida and ISIS in both Libya and Syria, demonstrating Clinton supplied weapons to ISIS via Syria.

wikileaks.org/clinton-emails…
Documents made public by Judicial Watch & separately by Wikileaks Julian Assange back up Turkish President Erdogan’s assertion that US-led coalition forces have given support to terror groups, including ISIS in Syria. When HRC is called before congress and asked directly she lies
Fox interview with Rand @RandPaul

A Defense Department docs from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated 9/12/2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” pay attention folks
Who was the director of the DIA at the time Benghazi went down and who was warning HRC and the Sate Dept, & Leon Panetta that an attack was planned? @GenFlynn and now you know why they were so desperate to get Flynn out of the seat of National Security Advisor. He knew the truth
The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. Flynn knew where all the bodies were buried. It's the reason Obama had to get rid of Flynn,
Barry also warned @realDonaldTrump to not hire Gen FLynn. Reason being @GenFlynn knew all the dirty secrets of all the illegal arms dealing the Obama admin was doing in the Middle East. As Nat'l Security Advisor he could sink them under the prison
Hillary Clinton knew that the US was sending arms from Libya to Syria back in 2011, a year before the Benghazi consulate attacks. She not only knew she was making a billion dollars doing it.
Emails prove they not only knew they were orchestrating it f, in violation of a book full of laws, NATO treaties and lying on top of it under oath to cover it up
This is what Benghazi was about, not promoting diplomacy in a region that could careless about diplomacy, it was about illegal arms deals and covering the guilty parties asses
Here Hillary Clinton lies under oath and Rand Paul knows it, he's seen the reports & the emails yet she falls back to her go to, playing dumb when all the while her & Bill with the help of McCain are getting rich selling arms to our enemies, and Americans are dying as a result
Michael J. Rogers was the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and the next morning he wanted to talk about weapons in Libya. Rogers was a war hawk and McCain loyalist, the cover up was already beginning
Marc Turi had been indicted by federal prosecutors in Phoenix for supplying arms to Libyan “rebels” during the 2010-2011 war.
The Obama administration dropped the criminal case one day before a court-ordered deadline to disclose information about its efforts to arm Muslim rebels.
Turi’s testified his arms shipments, destined for the Libyan rebels & channeled through Qatar & the UAE, were part of a US-authorized effort Turi said that the Obama admin was complicit in the shipment of weapons from Libya to ‘rebels’ in Syria, who are fighting the Assad regime
Despite all the overwhelming evidence, the deep state covered everything up, because these illegal arms deals went all the way up to the Oval office. They didn't have an Ollie North to sit and take the wrap, Turi was going to fight back.
DOJ was forced to drop the Turi prosecution because federal prosecutors were convinced his defense would expose Clinton’s secret arms running to the radical al-Qaida-affiliated militia in Libya in 2011.
People need to understand this goes on a whole lot more than they realize. Tax payer funded weapon, sold to enemies, where do those funds end up? Not back in the general fund. It lines the complicit politicians pockets, like McCain, Clinton, Graham, etc. They are hawkish for $$$
Here are some of the weapons seized from the Qaddafi regime. Weapons that were supplied by the State Dept in 2011, via the CIA filtered thru Marc Turi cloaked as a DoD contractor.....
Many of the rebels Clinton armed, using the weapons lawfully sold to Qatar by Marc Turi and others, were terrorist groups who are our sworn enemies, and they were enabling them, and costing American lives and endangering thousands.
DOJ faced a deadline to turn over discovery documents to the legal team of Marc Turi, who had been charged with selling weapons to Libyan rebels. Oct 5th an announcement came that the DOJ was dropping the case, which was set to go to trial on Nov. 8 election day 2016.
Paul: My question is: Is the U.S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons buying, selling anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?

Clinton: To Turkey? … I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody’s ever raised that with me. I, I …
She didn't deny it specifically she just said no one has ever asked her that before. Well no shit Hillary, the people that would ask that, and not complicit in the deal had just found out due to leaked emails of yours...
Among the casualties of her war were U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three colleagues, who were assassinated at the American consulate in Benghazi, by rebels Clinton armed with American military hardware in violation of American Law, she has never been held accountable
The evidence is still available, all these serial numbers a traceable to their origin, one thing about the DoD they love numbering things and love paperwork, there is a plethora of it on every piece... Someone just has to have the desire to go after it, and there lies the problem
There's a wide assortment of captured weapons that were being transported in crates clearly marked “State of Qatar, Qatar Armed Forces, Doha, Qatar. All approved back in May 2011
Hillary playing dumb to congress isn't hard to prove with her own email to Jake Sullivan talking about doing it.
The evidence is there, it's open source now after declassification.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons manufactured with tax money and sold to our enemies and their foreign currency goes where? Don't forget those pallets of cash Obama sent to Iran in different denominations of cash, billions of it.
Packing lists are available in open source.
Declassified DoD documents from Oct 2012 available n the DoD website talking about it..
In direct contradiction to the letter Thomas Gibbons sent @RandPaul under official query
And the list goes on and on.
Clinton decided she had to get rid of Qaddafi because she wanted to take credit when she ran for president for being the government official responsible for liberating Libya.
Clinton knew she would never get a declaration of war from Congress or authorization under the war powers resolution enacted over President Nixon’s veto in 1973 in Vietnam. So she created her own war funded with tax dollars and for her own personal profit
Clinton persuaded Obama to use CIA intelligence assets who would be exempted from the war powers resolution even if they wore military fatigues in Libya. I doubt it was an ideology with Barry, it was simply greed, he was on the way out and needed to get paid.
For her to use intel assets under the war powers resolution, Clinton needed the cooperation & informal consent of the Congress within the Congress, the House Committee on Intel & the Senate Select Committee on Intel, which are sworn to secrecy, that was going to take leverage & $
The conspirators are the president of the United States, the secretary of state and about two dozen people in the House and Senate, including the leadership of both parties in both houses, can authorize a clandestine war using CIA assets, that takes leverage to pull off.
And this is exactly what Obama and Clinton did. They used their leverage and influence and likely Clinton's decades of dirt she had compiled to leverage these deals.
Once she had the go ahead of the House & Senate intel committees, Clinton began a secret gun-running operation to Libya, using a provision in the UN-imposed arms embargo on Libya that allowed the foreign minister of participating countries to grant an exception to the embargo.
The irony of Turi’s case is that he never actually shipped any weapons to Libya. But in prosecuting Turi for planning to ship weapons, Turi’s attorneys argued in his defense that the Obama admin was planning to blame Turi for the arms shipment should Clinton’s get caught
But with all her arrogance & what she thought was an untouchable status she never dreamed her clandestine arms dealings would ever become public. Wikileaks really screwed her in that way. They didn't need to pay someone to make up shit about her, just reveal the truth about her.
Even the Left's precious NYT wrote a lengthy article on this deal and it was just pushed aside. Barry giving his democrat mesmerizing speeches, that kept the sheep entertained that everything is fine folks nothing to see here.

nytimes.com/2012/12/06/wor…
I did find this interesting in the case of Marc Turi, look who was his attorneys, multiple attorneys from Perkin Coie
Little background on Turi Defense it is incorporated in NV
TURI DEFENSE GROUP, INC.
7251 W LAKE MEAD BLVD STE 300
LAS VEGAS, NV 89128-8380
Turi Defense Group Inc. is listed as both as a vendor with the US General Services Administration & as a lobbying firm with the US Senate
Turi actually became an acquaintance of Chris Stevens, introduced by a mutal friend. John McCain, Turi had been going defense contracts via the Senate Arms Committee for several years. With McCain's prompting Turi realized that Libya could be a lucrative new market
Turi applied to the State Department for a license to provide weapons to the rebels there. This is according to e-mails & other documents Turi has provided to the court in his defense & others that had been seized by the Dept of Homeland Security during the raid of his home
So there sets up the players. McCain being the senior member of the Senate Arms Committee. Clinton being Sec of State, and Stevens working for the State Dept under HRC. Stevens was in touch with and gave assistance to arms dealer, Marc Turi.
Trial evidence shows that Turi had exchanged e-mails regarding arms sales with Stevens, who was then then “special representative” to the Libyan rebel alliance. Turi sought Stevens help with his arms business.
Stevens wasn't promoted to Ambassador of Libya until June 7, 2012, when he was sent to Tripoli and eventually into Benghazi when that was where the weapons cache was discovered. So basically he was a "special liaison" helping broker arms deals in the Middle East! Interesting.
In early 2011 Turi sought out Stevens by email requesting assistance in getting approval on an arms deal application. Stevens replied and said he would “share” Turi’s proposal with colleagues in Washington DC
Now according to e-mails “provided” by Turi to the U. S. authorities the U.S. rejected initial Turi’s application for a license to sell to Libya in late March 2011. Then there's a email from Stevens instructing Turi to change the delivery point to Qatar.
That application was filed exactly one week after the Libya application was denied and covered a list of arms identical to the ones in the Libya application. The Qatar application was approved in 2 days.
DDTC isn’t that stupid, no way they think we are either. Say you’re a compliance officer & an employee asks to ship some flowers to Iran. You say no. 5 min later he’s back in your office saying he decided to send the exact same flowers to the UAE instead. No problem, you say.
Does anyone honestly think that DDTC or BIS or OFAC would look the other way? Or would they have your head on a platter?

DDTC and that State Department almost certainly were fine with letting Qatar arm the rebels in Libya; they just could not admit that in writing.
When the story on Benghazi was unraveling in the 2014 hearings before congress. The DOJ hurries up and charges Turi with an illegal arms deal that he really never made. He was charged with lying on the second application based on the identical packing lists.
When Turi didn't just roll over and fought back and his attorneys going after in depth discovery, they DOJ took it all the way down to the deadline of compliance, and dropped all charges the day before they would have to produce evidence.
Think about the list of people the Obama Admin went after and how they are all linked to Benghazi, and the illegal arms dealings surrounding it. I'll try to break it down to you and provide sources. Try to give it some context and explain the time line.
Some people are conflating this with Operation Timber Sycamore (OTS) but Benghazi was a done deal before OTS ever got off the ground. However when Petraeus implemented OTS it uncovered a lot of things and it led to him being targeted, to keep him quiet since he couldn't be bought
Petraeus is credited with coming up with the OTS while he was the CIA chief, it was kinda the reason he was put their because Panetta was not going to be involved in the coverup of the illegal weapons sales. Panetta was aware what was going on, but had a get out of jail free card
That card was the fact that Clinton/Obama had authorized those sales and he had it in writing, but the coverup is what would get you put in prison. Had he been called before congress if things went south, he can say it was ok'd from above his head, but the coverup never is ok.
Understand that I refer to these as "illegal", prior to OTS because they were not authorized by congress, at least not in the body of congress. And that my friends, is illegal. Especially when it went from selling a few AKs, Dragunovs & ammo to US arms & tax dollars
As far as we can document so far thru open sources, as I detailed in docs earlier Clinton/McCain were selling arms to our enemies as early as 2010, it's likely earlier, but until some more docs are unclassified we have to stick with that, 2010 is bad enough. It's happened before
Here's a little history lesson for you. From 1977-1981 the CIA was selling arms to Qaddafi, where things went wrong was when a 21 ton load of C-4 plastic explosive was flown out of Houston International Airport to Qaddafi in Libya in 1977, then that same C-4 took down Pan Am 103
To get an idea of how much C-4 this is, it's an amount which represented almost the entire US domestic supply at that time. Enough to take . Enough to take down 20,000 Pan Am 103's. This was arranged by a former CIA Operative named Ed Wilson.
Who is Edwin P Wilson, well Ed Wilson was an Operation 40 member & cabal member. Wilson officially left the CIA in 1971 for a job with the Office of Naval Intelligence's secret Task Force 157. Just google Task Force 157 & there is plenty on it. #DeepStateExposed
Non-typical Vietnam spook force TF 157 was all over the Middle East and got out of control. After the Huge C-4 shipment out of IAH to Libya was flagged by the BATF, I've yet to find out how they knew about it, but less than a month later TF 157 was disestablished
Before people go nuts & think they need tinfoil here's some sourcing from Bob Woodard on TF 157

Pentagon to Abolish Secret Spy Unit washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
With the flagging of the C-4 deal by the BATF it also motivated a Federal Prosecutor by the name of Larry Barcella, and he is a pit bull. this was a bad thing for the cabal because he will not play ball with them. He's a crusader and still believes in the constitution.
The investigation resulted in a 1983 NDVA & SDH convictions of Wilson & is what led to the discovery of the C-4 amounts shipped to Qadaffi. By 1983 Barcella & a BATF team had been on Ed Wilson's trail for 5 years. The amount of C-4 shipped wasn't known at first.
Understand this entire time Ed Wilson was claiming innocence as he was following orders from the cabal, but hen the BATF and Barcella started digging they were getting dangerously close to exposing the real truth, the cabal had to do something fast, enter the "Briggs Affidavit"
This document was written and sworn by Charles Briggs. Charles A. Briggs, then the third-ranking CIA official. His affidavit was the lynch pin convincing Barcella of Wilson's guilt and ultimately Wilson's conviction and incarceration for 20 years. But Houston we have a problem
17 yrs after Wilson's conviction it turns out the affidavit was a lie. Wilson had been asked to perform services for the CIA as a member of TF 157. What else came out of it, the CIA didn't authorize the C-4 sale to Qaddafi, but someone did. Wilson couldn't supply that on his own
Here's some sourcing for this fiasco

Fallout From a CIA Affidavit washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
Wilson's conviction was overturned, and reading the brief is a must and it really shows just to what extent the cabal will go to to cover their asses.

fas.org/sgp/jud/wilson…
A little more background on the Ed Wilson Charles Briggs fiasco

justicedenied.org/issue/issue_24…
Here is some video of a documentary that has interviews with some of the players in these arms deals Part 1 of 2 There is a lot of other disturbing stuff covered as well.

Mad Dog: Inside the Secret World of Muammar Qaddafi part I dai.ly/x1bytzx
Mad Dog: Inside the Secret World of Muammar Gaddafi part II dai.ly/x1byzry
More on the Wilson frame job

False Evidence Cited in Overturning Arms Dealer's Case washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
I need to say this since so many are watching this thread, I don't make it a habit of blocking, but if you come on this thread or my timeline bashing @GenFlynn or any member of his family you will be instantly blocked with no further discussion. Gen Flynn is a hero simple as that
People are DMing me asking "what does the the Ed Wilson case have to do with Benghazi?", in a short nothing directly, other than the fact it shows that the real reason for Benghazi was a repeat of historical arms deals in that region, with a different twist
The case of Edwin Paul Wilson is instructive for anyone who doubts that the US Government would knowingly use false evidence to obtain a conviction and that a Court of Appeals would affirm such a conviction based on those lies.
To summarize Wilson’s case Wilson was a CIA operative whom the CIA used in 1977 to sell then Libyan dictator Qaddafi some 20 tons of the plastic explosive C-4 & to provide US experts to train the Libyans to conceal the explosives as such things as lamps, radios, and ashtrays.
To put 20 tons of C-4 into perspective, that amount could be used to bring down at least 20,000 jumbo jets. Unfortunately for Wilson, he got caught in these US Government sponsored illegal acts and his case went to trial.
Wilson’s defense was that he was only carrying out the orders of the CIA. A critical part of the trial is that the prosecution obtained & introduced an affidavit signed by CIA OIG Briggs & certified by CIA chief counsel Stanley Sporkin, who later become a US district judge.
That affidavit effectively stated that Wilson was not directly or indirectly connected to the CIA at the time the crimes were committed. But the affidavit was a lie, and the jury specifically relied on that affidavit to find Wilson guilty.
Wilson was convicted in 1983 & was sentenced to jail. Wilson appealed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, but Wilson’s conviction was affirmed even though the Court knew that the defendant presented evidence indicating that affidavit consisted of lies.
The US Government refused to provide evidence confirming the truth of the defendants’ pleas. 17 years after Wilson’s conviction, the US Southern District of Texas overturned his conviction in 2003, based on additional evidence that Wilson’s legal team managed to obtain.
Judge Hughes’ opinion is worth reading if only to gain some insight into the CIA’s operations & how the US Government can & does lie. Judge Hughes puts it more mildly:

fas.org/sgp/jud/wilson…
“This opinion refers only to the part of the record that the government has reluctantly agreed may be made public. It does not attempt to recount even that limited range of data in its entirety; the governmental deceit mentioned here is illustrative—not exhaustive.”
As a final note to Wilson’s case, after he successfully overturned his conviction, he filed a civil lawsuit against Charles Briggs & 7 former prosecutors, 2 of whom were then district court judges. As you might guess, Wilson’s civil lawsuit was dismissed.
The Wilson's civil suit was dismissed on the grounds that all eight defendants had immunity governing their otherwise illegal actions. It's the old Potomac two step. They stack the deck in their favor and it takes a monumental task to overcome it. Marc Turi did.
Back to Benghazi here is the committee findings submission by Trey @TGowdySC read carefully, I will post some screen grabs of importance.

aim.org/benghazi/wp-co…
Here are the Turks involved in suspect behavior, the Consulate Gen Akin arrives to eat dinner with Stevens, outside the Ansar al-Sharia is gathering forces. It's reported by neighbors no in and out of the neighborhood, but the Turks leave no problem & no heads up to Stevens
The Attack begins, they are pleading for help from the State Dept only to be refused
Ansar al-Sharia claims credit for the attack on social media

Greg Hicks tells HRC by phone it was a terrorist attack

The narrative about video is beginning to take shape
Stevens body found by looters
The cover up begins
Obama tells the lie from the Rose Garden

The response Team is on the Tarmac ready but held back by the State Dept. Changing clothes

HRC lies to the face of a parent

Carney is lies at the presser, Ben Rhodes is emailing talking points to get the lie straight.
The cover up continues despite eye witnesses saying things to the contrary
The FBI arrives in Tripoli a week after the attack, but never sets foot in Benghazi! Some investigation that is.

4 days earlier an in country report for CNN found Stevens journal o the floor of the consulate

Crime scene obviously not secured
Brennan showed up in Libya in Qct, likely double checking the sanitation of the area. Finger pointing begins in DC, FBI (Mueller) not taking the blame for the lies told, CIA admits to it

Petraeus resigns
Congress starts investigation

Hillary resigns.
Interesting testimony from Mueller

Lots of witnesses to Benghazi are dead
Still trying to figure out what happened to these bad guys, these are surveillance stills from Benghazi, not much evidence yet as to their current dispositions
This hombre especially, from the footage he looks like a chief, they can't tell me he's not on some cork board on a blacksite somewhere. That image should be able to be identified thru facial recognition I's think..
This is Ahmed Abu Khattala at the time of capture and his mug shot from GITMO two years later, he healed up nicely. However I don't see him in any of the surveillance photos, none the less he's a bad guy and got 22 years in prison recently if I recall.
These three interest me the most, they appear to be giving orders more than anything. Their faces are there, where are they? FBI claims five suspects identified by the FBI, but it's unknown if these three are in that 5
How about this guy, in this Getty image, pretty amazing photo, just curious if they had a guy in the ground or this was just a freelance photographer that sod his photo to Getty.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Roscoe B Davis🎖⭐️⭐️⭐️
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!