So I was requested to do a thread on the datuk keramat. This is something most of us have heard about, but few understand its history or where it comes from, which is sad because this is a great example of not just cultural exchange, but an underlying similarity between them
During the Georgetown Festival of 2017, a foreign photographer gave tours to showcase the datuk of Chinese temples. But without easy access to info on the topic, her version of history was (admittedly) guesswork and entirely incorrect, so I won't even bother to repeat it
So what is a datuk keramat? Datuk is of course the Malay word for grandfather. By extension it also means old man. As a title it's bestowed onto a respected person and is related to the Filipino chiefly title Datu
Keramat is the Malay pronunciation for the Arabic karamah. In Arabic the term is equivalent to charisma, and therefore the gift of "charismatic grace" to perform miracles. This was especially common among the Sufis who introduced Islam to Southeast Asia
Now if you ask the average Malaysian what keramat means, a common definition is "the grave of a Muslim saint". Some modern books will use this definition exclusively but it is only partly true. Keramat as an adjective can be applied to animals or people with supernatural powers
But in general a datuk keramat is some local personality. They might be the founder of the village, a missionary, or any other revered figure with that charismatic quality of karamah. And after death, their grave becomes the site of salutory rituals, eg when asking for favours
If this sounds like idolatry, that's because it is. Despite the word being of Arabic origin, the concept of keramat in Malay culture actually predates the influence of Arabs and Islam, tracing back to indigenous animism and ancestor worship
Even in the old days, the history of the datuk was commonly forgotten. Their name might be the only thing remembered, and sometimes not even that. Their gravestones are all that's left standing, usually in the village but other times in the surrounding jungle
But the curious thing is.. there isn't always a grave. Many older keramat were located far into the jungle or on hills with no trace of a gravesite. Locals claim these to be the keramat of djinn, but always "jin Islam" so that nobody calls them deviant
For Malays, the datuk keramat had to be Muslim. Race and gender didn't matter. They could be Malay, Thai, Javanese, Acehnese, Indian, even orang asli. But by the time of the colonial era, Islam had become a requirement for a datuk to be the object of Malay worship
While the religious centre of a village was ostensibly the mosque, each kampung usually had a keramat which was accorded even greater respect, controversial as that may seem to us today. A person who'd lie with the Quran above his head would fear telling a lie before Datuk Machap
But Malays weren't the only ones who revered the datuk keramat. So did the Chinese community. While sacred sites are found in almost every culture worldwide, the Malay tradition of datuk keramat would have seemed especially familiar to the Chinese
For the Chinese, as with Malays, the dead were believed to bestow favours.. like giving you the winning lottery numbers. Ancestors and folk heroes were often deified and worshipped at shrines. It would've made perfect sense for them to find this same culture among Malays
So Chinese in Southeast Asia fully acknowledged and respected the local keramat, in addition to praying to their own earth deities. Race and religion don't matter, as most of the datuk in Chinese shrines aren't even Chinese
For non-Muslims, the religion of the datuk is irrelevant. Til this day there are Malay Muslim datuk worshipped at Chinese shrines. In respect to their faith, pork is prohibited in their shrines
Among both locals and foreigners, datuk keramat are often mistaken for a purely Chinese tradition, though some do recognise a "fusion with Malay influence". The truth is that not all which is Malay is/was/must be Muslim
Datuk keramat have been a part of Malay culture for centuries and were described by the colonists as a Malay tradition. But as it died out among the Malay community in modern times, only the Chinese have preserved this aspect of local folk religion
Sources:
Hamid Dabashi
Charles Otto Blagden
George C Bellamy
Ghulam-Sarwar Yousof
And for some more information on this topic, read this thread too
Very long thread on misconceptions regarding the Orang Asli, Malay origins, and indigeneity in Malaysia. I'll be repeating myself a lot here but this time I'll try to include a source for each point
"Malays are immigrants from Indonesia"
I want to start with this because it leads in to some later points. This is based on outdated theories of human migration which assumed that the ancestors of several SEA peoples arrived a matter of centuries ago
It is currently believed that the ancestors of all Austronesian-speakers came from Taiwan. What about later periods? Migration from what is now Indonesia included intra-Malay and international migration
Two reasons. For one thing, it's a simple matter of language. Many Malays, including those who are fluent in English, don't know what liberal means. It's the reason why in Malaysia, liberal just means "anything I disagree with", much in the same way they misunderstand "consent"
The other reason is the popular American use of liberal to mean the left-wing, with "conservative" meaning the right. This isn't what either of those terms mean but for certain historical reasons it's become accepted usage worldwide
While the fear of "liberals" goes back to around the 2000s, Malays didn't adopt the word conservative on a large scale until much more recently, especially after the late 2010s
I got around to watching Mat Kilau. Now I'm sure you've all heard enough about this film already, but I kept my mouth mostly shut until now so I think there are a few points that deserve to be reiterated
This won't be a review but I will start by saying that the movie is entertaining and moves at a steady pace. The silat choreography is decent but ruined by shaky camera. Please can we do away with the shaky cam?
Many have already pointed out the movie's numerous historical inaccuracies. It would take forever to go deeply into them, but for those interested, here's an article by the historian Ranjit Singh Malhi
You mean like how you consider Zakir Naik an authority on Christianity, Hinduism, etc?
Also "berotoriti" is even more annoying to see than "komited". So much for upholding the Malay language
So is themerdekatimes an authority on Christianity? What their link says isn't that it's forbidden for Christians, but that it's not biblical. The source is a Protestant website which says that RIP is a Catholic thing without a biblical basis
Also note how every place on the map is labelled with its modern name except peninsular Malaysia is "Tanah Melayu", which Cendekiawan Palsu presumably believes is the old name for the country
He's talking about outdated race science, which uses the term Malay for all Austronesian-speaking groups as a single racial category. No academic takes this seriously today. Malay is an ethnicity, not a race. Not all Austronesian-speakers are Malay
Since this appears to be genuine, I'll reply without being snarky and in a way that even the uninformed from outside Malaysia can understand. The Patriots is a publishing company who release books and also post articles on social media
I've read their posts, their articles and a couple of their books for a few years, though I haven't really kept up during the past year. Nonetheless, my criticism of TP is not blind hatred and I have good reason to call them dangerous
By their own admission, TP is firmly right-wing (although they erroneously use this term interchangeably with "conservative"). Their founders and writers are entirely right-wing to varying degrees. The co-founder is a self-proclaimed Malay nationalist