Follow me on BlueSky and Threads Profile picture
Jan 28, 2019 18 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Kamala Harris at an event hosted by the Commonwealth Club in 2010, explaining her decision as San Francisco DA to get tough on truancy.

Critics of truancy crackdowns say such efforts unfairly target poor parents and children without actually helping students.
Running for Attorney General, Harris pushed an anti-truancy bill which Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law in 2010 to allow truancy to become a crime all its own. Before the bill, truancy had to be prosecuted as child endangerment.
Under the bill, truant is defined as more than 3 unexcused absences in a school year. Parents of students who miss more than 10 percent of their classes would be offered state help and then if absences continued, would be subject to a $2000 fine or yearlong jail sentence.
It is worth noting that SFGate credits DA Harris' anti-truancy push in San Francisco with a reduction in truancy rates by 23 percent between 2008 and 2009. However, SFGate did note that the trend went back 3 years at least. Harris' push came in '07. m.sfgate.com/news/article/P…
Unsurprisingly, statistics from California from '16-'17 indicate that truancy's a problem disproportionately affecting communities of color, foster youth, homeless youth, students with disabilities. Tough on truancy adheres to the idea that those groups just need more motivation.
Kamala Harris continued on to describe how she'd brought charges against a single homeless mother of 3 who was working 2 jobs because her children were truant...and this was a success story.
Harris doesn’t say it clearly, but her career indicates a belief in Broken Windows-style retributive justice. Outside her involvement in a national foreclosure settlement, her office really targeted low level offenses—truancy, minor drug sales, graffiti, vandalism, auto burglary.
Harris' beliefs in retributive justice are deeply held. Here's a video of Harris from 2013 at the Chicago Ideas Week mocking criminal justice reformers as unrealistic and ideological.
Harris follows up with a story criticizing the "knee-jerk response" to criminal justice by Democrats.
In this 2009 interview, Harris explains the truancy initiative. The anchors seem uncomfortably skeptical after she explains the process: infraction at first for parents with the option of assistance or prosecution. Then increasing punishments for repeat truancy and likely jail.
Apparently, the speech from the beginning of this thread wasn't a one-off. It was a stump speech for her 2010 Attorney General campaign. This video is from a campaign event on November 2009.
It's practically a clone, right down to the story of the single, homeless mother of 3 working 2 jobs, charged for the truancy of her children, who took the help offered by Harris' office and as a result, wasn't prosecuted.
This was Harris' truancy policy as Attorney General in 2013, following the legislation she pushed which Governor Schwarzenegger signed in 2010: oag.ca.gov/sites/all/file…

Thanks to @Vj248J for finding this!
@Vj248J Kamala Harris was giving this same pitch about how prosecuting parents for truancy was smart/necessary as recently as 2014 at Vanity Fair's New Establishment Summit. Kirsten Gillibrand was there too. She praised it as an example of the focus women bring to leadership.
@Vj248J It's notable that gone from her story, however, is the bit about actually bringing charges against a homeless mother of 3 working 2 jobs.
@Vj248J Harris' campaign responded to these videos, telling HuffPost, "She believed a critical way to keep kids out of jail when they’re older is to keep them in school when they’re young,” huffingtonpost.com/entry/kamala-h…
@Vj248J But intentions aside, Jezebel reports Harris' office brought charges against 20 parents in truancy cases in '09. In '12, due to the anti-truancy law Harris pushed, one woman was sentenced to 180 days in jail bc her two kids missed over 100 days of school. theslot.jezebel.com/this-is-what-t…
@Vj248J Harris was still touting her efforts on truancy in 2017.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Follow me on BlueSky and Threads

Follow me on BlueSky and Threads Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WalkerBragman

Oct 24, 2023
The "If everyone is mad at my article, I got it right" conventional wisdom needs to be retired already.

Faye, I'm a reporter who covers disinformation and dark money. Your article got it wrong and these folks you keep engaging with are extremists.
Thacker, for example, was the Twitter Files guy who implied (wrongly) that Taylor Lorenz's uncle owned the Internet Archive. He writes for the Brownstone Institute, a far-right dark money outfit that promotes misinformation and conspiracy thinking.
Image
Image
I could go on and on and on about why affiliating with Brownstone is damning, but I think this screenshot should suffice.

This is a Brownstone article by the group's founder about accountability for public health officials. Note the image used. Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 19, 2023
Today, I am excited to announce that I have a story in @RollingStone, which is also cross-published with Important Context.

The scoop: America's largest charitable funds have been funding anti-vaccine groups throughout the pandemic.

rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
Please subscribe to Important Context so we can continue doing this kind of reporting!

importantcontext.news/p/americas-big…
Also, please find me on Blu*Sky and Thr*ads.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 24, 2023
The White House plan is to let you get infected every year—perhaps multiple times—with a virus linked to a host of serious health problems and for which reinfection makes those problems more likely.
CDC won’t even recommend masking at this point. It’s just pathetic.

They bet everything on the vaccines early on but didn’t adapt when it became clear that the jabs wouldn’t be enough on their own.

The goal now seems to be normalization of current levels of infection
Setting aside CDC changing the color scheme and metric of its transmission map to make the crisis seem less bad; setting aside the “end” of the emergency phase of the pandemic; most damning of all has been the near total lack of communication from the admin around long COVID.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 18, 2023
It's incredible how reliably conspiracy theories end up reinforcing--rather than challenging--power.

COVID conspiracy theories, for example, fuel opposition to public health measures opposed by big business.
Anti-vaccine conspiracy theories not only lead to hesitancy, which helps new strains develop, but you don't see antivaxxers calling to strip pharmaceutical companies of IP protections for their vaccines.
Conspiracy theories misdirect anger and attention away from the actual villains toward shadowy forces often unnamed--or, in other cases, individuals undeserving of the hate that ends up directed their way.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 3, 2023
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya's credibility savaged in yet another Canadian court decision.

"He stubbornly He stubbornly refused to admit that his statement...was inaccurate"


Image
Image
Image
Image
"Dr. Bhattacharya was reluctant to accept any evidence or opinion that may cast doubt on his opinions."

"He conceded that he aware that the article had been retracted...but he did not raise that fact until he was cross-examined on it

This is wild.

Just a completely dishonest.

Image
Image
Image
In this Alberta case, Bhattacharya cited Sweden as an of good COVID response.

When made aware that Alberta's death rate was about 15% of Sweden's, he said age-adjusted analysis was necessary to make that comparison.

But concedes on cross he hadn't conducted such an analysis. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 15, 2023
NEW: The parents’ rights group known as Parents Defending Education calls itself “grassroots.”

Tax filings reveal that in its first year, 2021, it received hundreds of thousands of dollars from major right-wing organizations and funds.

importantcontext.news/p/major-grassr…
The funders of Parents Defending Education, which was founded by right-wing operative Nicole Neily, a veteran of the political influence network of Charles Koch, include the Searle Freedom Trust, which funds a number of groups in Koch’s network.

The trust gave $250K.
Important Context has previously reported that another “grassroots” parents’ rights group, Moms For Liberty, received much of its funding in its first year (2021) in just 5 large donations.

MFL was recently designated an extremist organization by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(