Kamala Harris at an event hosted by the Commonwealth Club in 2010, explaining her decision as San Francisco DA to get tough on truancy.
Critics of truancy crackdowns say such efforts unfairly target poor parents and children without actually helping students.
Running for Attorney General, Harris pushed an anti-truancy bill which Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law in 2010 to allow truancy to become a crime all its own. Before the bill, truancy had to be prosecuted as child endangerment.
Under the bill, truant is defined as more than 3 unexcused absences in a school year. Parents of students who miss more than 10 percent of their classes would be offered state help and then if absences continued, would be subject to a $2000 fine or yearlong jail sentence.
It is worth noting that SFGate credits DA Harris' anti-truancy push in San Francisco with a reduction in truancy rates by 23 percent between 2008 and 2009. However, SFGate did note that the trend went back 3 years at least. Harris' push came in '07. m.sfgate.com/news/article/P…
Unsurprisingly, statistics from California from '16-'17 indicate that truancy's a problem disproportionately affecting communities of color, foster youth, homeless youth, students with disabilities. Tough on truancy adheres to the idea that those groups just need more motivation.
Kamala Harris continued on to describe how she'd brought charges against a single homeless mother of 3 who was working 2 jobs because her children were truant...and this was a success story.
Harris doesn’t say it clearly, but her career indicates a belief in Broken Windows-style retributive justice. Outside her involvement in a national foreclosure settlement, her office really targeted low level offenses—truancy, minor drug sales, graffiti, vandalism, auto burglary.
Harris' beliefs in retributive justice are deeply held. Here's a video of Harris from 2013 at the Chicago Ideas Week mocking criminal justice reformers as unrealistic and ideological.
Harris follows up with a story criticizing the "knee-jerk response" to criminal justice by Democrats.
In this 2009 interview, Harris explains the truancy initiative. The anchors seem uncomfortably skeptical after she explains the process: infraction at first for parents with the option of assistance or prosecution. Then increasing punishments for repeat truancy and likely jail.
Apparently, the speech from the beginning of this thread wasn't a one-off. It was a stump speech for her 2010 Attorney General campaign. This video is from a campaign event on November 2009.
It's practically a clone, right down to the story of the single, homeless mother of 3 working 2 jobs, charged for the truancy of her children, who took the help offered by Harris' office and as a result, wasn't prosecuted.
This was Harris' truancy policy as Attorney General in 2013, following the legislation she pushed which Governor Schwarzenegger signed in 2010: oag.ca.gov/sites/all/file…
@Vj248J Kamala Harris was giving this same pitch about how prosecuting parents for truancy was smart/necessary as recently as 2014 at Vanity Fair's New Establishment Summit. Kirsten Gillibrand was there too. She praised it as an example of the focus women bring to leadership.
@Vj248J It's notable that gone from her story, however, is the bit about actually bringing charges against a homeless mother of 3 working 2 jobs.
@Vj248J Harris' campaign responded to these videos, telling HuffPost, "She believed a critical way to keep kids out of jail when they’re older is to keep them in school when they’re young,” huffingtonpost.com/entry/kamala-h…
@Vj248J But intentions aside, Jezebel reports Harris' office brought charges against 20 parents in truancy cases in '09. In '12, due to the anti-truancy law Harris pushed, one woman was sentenced to 180 days in jail bc her two kids missed over 100 days of school. theslot.jezebel.com/this-is-what-t…
@Vj248J Harris was still touting her efforts on truancy in 2017.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Honestly, Joe Biden may go down as one of the worst, weakest presidents in history.
He epitomizes the sorry state of the Democratic Party — old, out of touch, ineffectual, beholden to special interests, and wasting time in the face of pressing crises.
Strong Weimar vibes.
For decades, the right has worked to weaken/dismantle/complicate the federal government to the point where another New Deal was impossible. It has largely succeeded (with help from neoliberal Democrats).
Between the filibuster, the unleashed political spending, and the outsourcing of government jobs to the private sector through public-private partnerships, government today barely functions.
The COVID pandemic, more than anything in my lifetime — more than the 2016 or 2020 primaries — has really revealed where people stand on the role of government.
Neoliberalism has been deeply woven into our social fabric indeed.
The idea that public health, in a deadly pandemic, should be left to individual choice, the private sector, and states rather than the federal government? Neoliberalism.
The idea that there is no social contract and any restriction on individuals is tyranny? More neoliberalism.
Because what these ideas really boil down to is simple: there should be no infringement on capital by government.
Hop, skip, and a jump from the reactionary,neoliberal pandemic response to right-to-work laws and support for free trade.
Anti-vaxxers often claim there’s a conspiracy to vaccinate everyone. The opposite is true.
Pfizer and Moderna have been fighting efforts at the WTO to share their vaccine IP with the world — between that and drug pricing, it’s their top priority right now.
Doses expiring before they get into people’s arms works out just fine for these companies bc governments will need to buy more jabs.
Global vaccine apartheid works for them too bc new variants emerging means more vaccines — potentially even new vaccines — will be needed.
We know these companies have prioritized wealthy nations that can afford their products.
April 30, 2020 letter from ALEC to President Trump urging him to reopen America.
Similar arguments are being used today by self-identified leftists against public health measures. alec.org/article/empowe…
Another right-wing, business-aligned group making these arguments at the time was the Koch-founded FreedomWorks, which organized Tea Party protests in 2009 and anti-lockdown protests in April 2020. nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/…
In March 2021, DonorsTrust, another Koch affiliate, started spending big to spread the narrative that the pandemic death toll was actually due to public health measures.