That's very different than what Strzok told @replouiegohmert
He goes back to the office and changes out the email team. Changes out the agents with Chinese experience to....
My guess it is those 22 that BHO asserted EP on.
JULY 22nd 2015
A lot happened on this day and was a pivotal point in this entire mess.
6/19/15 A memo from State OIG Linick & ICIG McCullough to Pat Kennedy of State making four recommendations related to Clinton email investigation on mishandling classified material.
All Counterintelligence Investigations, fall under the Nat Sec Arm. #ObstructionOfJustice
“We’re talking about a Cabinet-level official who was accommodated by the government for reasons unknown to the public..
4/18/16 Adm Mike Rogers cut off the contractor access to 702 DB.
And wouldn’t you know it? CrowdStrike’s report on this data breach is not publicly available.
Now back to this stupid intent nonesense
This is the statute these knuckleheads are saying requires intent. Couldn't be further from the truth.
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information....
"with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location"
Did she intend to use her server? Damn right she did, that's why she had it built, to use it.
Pretty self explanatory, sharing documents with congress don't count.
Again self explanatory.
18 U.S. Code § 793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
In no language on earth does "gross negligence" mean intent. I saw this argued and it's ludicrous.
"gross negligence" is "gross negligence" that's it PERIOD
superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
There is ZERO language regarding intent and legalese is very specific, it it doesn't say it, it's not the law PERIOD.
You can't insert some level of "mens rea" where there is no language in the statute to support that level of mens rea.
That language supports a level of mens rea
So what's mens rea? Simply the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.
Simple calling it gross negligence nails her in writing. In the law words are specific and they matter.
SDNY informs FBI-HQ of the existence of the emails.
Guess what SHE DID NOT