1st: that’s not how citations work.
2nd: Lit reviews often contain errors & misrepresentations of other research.
So, what did I find? . . . .
However, again, this study was not investigating REASONS for obtaining an abortion. It was looking at the effect of the above variables on *confidence* in the decision.
There is *no* possible way to examine whether fetal anomaly or maternal health was a reason for seeking a second or third trimester abortion from the data in this study.
This means: don’t copy & paste claims from lit reviews.