The Case for Brexit is like a vast labyrinth of logically interconnected passages. Each passageway contains a point, a fact, a quote, or something else supporting the argument against EU membership. /1
For those people in it, the labyrinth makes sense; the argument ‘holds together’. Further exploration begets more understanding of its logic. Something quite small may have first drawn you in here, but you may go deeper, mastering each point in every byway, twist and turn. /2
In one passageway, there is an old wooden door. This leads to a different (harder) level in the labyrinth. No longer about interconnected arguments *against* EU membership, but instead to the very secret of *how* to leave. /3
Only a few dozen people have dared pass through the door although many others linger around it, waiting to hear from the more adventurous when they return. Over the years, many returners from this level’s darkest recesses have talked of ‘EFTA’ and ‘EEA’. /4
The ‘how’ level is deep and dark, yet is also thought to contain mind-bending stuff. It has sent several truth-seekers slightly mad. The farther one ventures into it, the closer one gets to the secret of HOW. /5
You go though the door, and years later you reach the inner sanctum of this level. There in a corner is a huge chest labelled “Northern Ireland”. No one in the labyrinth has reached this far before. /6
On opening the chest, you are presented with lots of technology – ANPR cameras, RFID chips, and specialist mobile patrols. This seems to be the final piece of the HOW puzzle.
You are triumphant. You have cracked the code. So can we finally leave the EU for sunlit uplands? /7
Not so fast. When you remove the bits of technology from the chest, there, written on the bottom of the chest are the following words: “None of this technology works. There is no secret. None of the labyrinth works either. You’ve made a mistake. RUN.” /8
At which point you are totally lost: “You mean the WHOLE labyrinth is a con? But it made sense! Everyone I spoke to thought it made sense!”
Then a booming voice from somewhere says: “But everyone you spoke to was also in the labyrinth…” /9
Ashen-faced, you step back.
“So you’re saying this whole thing turns on NORTHERN IRELAND??”
“Yes”, comes the booming voice.
“But hardly anyone talked about it! Where were the clues??!”
“Oh they were there”, says the voice, “you just ignored them.” /10
At which point a door opens in the wall of the inner sanctum and fresh air rushes in.
“This” says the booming voice, “is your chance to exit to reality.”
“You mean like the guy in the Truman Show”, you say, crushed.
“Exactly”, says the voice.
And you step through the door. /11
Breathing in the air outside, you ponder.
“So this is Remain”.
“Oh God No!” says the voice, “that’s to your left.”
Glancing left, you see a door in the hillside.
“What’s that?” you ask.
“Well” says the voice, “it’s the entry to a vast labyrinth and it works like this….”
/ENDS
(Well it was a bit of fun writing it.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Reeves also made it clear that Labour would not reverse Brexit. Asked if she could see Britain rejoining the EU or single market in the next 50 years, she replied: “No, I can’t see those circumstances.”
"She said she would “make Brexit work” by improving on the EU-UK trade deal signed by Johnson, and endorsed by Labour, by seeking to widen access to the single market for professionals, the cultural industry and the City."
"But she does not want to see a return to free movement, arguing that voters in Leeds, where she is an MP, were “rightly angry” that new jobs in the city were being directly advertised in eastern Europe."
A hypothesis on what was wrong with UK/EU relations:
The shape & meaning of the EU/EEC and of UK-EU relations were and are in the eye of the beholder.
While this is true to some extent for life in general, the EU and UK/EU relationship went further in this regard. Thread.... /1
If, as a UK citizen in 1975, you wanted to show that the EEC and its members were heading for full political union, you could (and can) do so. There's plenty on the historic record suggesting this is exactly what would happen. You could then agree or disagree with that goal. /2
May I commend @EmporersNewC 's many threads on how the goal of political union was always in plain sight. /3
This will be no surprise to anyone who has tracked Pete North in recent months. Once part of "sensible Leave" centred on staying in the EEA, now a full-on anti-immigration, anti-RNLI Farageist spewing BS.