I will make the previous post the beginning of a thread about @GovBillWeld's announcement today at Politics & Eggs that he's forming an exploratory committee to primary @realDonaldTrump. My backgrounder from yesterday here: reason.com/blog/2019/02/1…
"I'm here actually because I think our country is in grave peril." -- @GovBillWeld talking now.
"He acts like a schoolyard bully, except of course when he is around other bullies, like Mr. Putin, and then he turns ingratiating, all smiles, kicks the American press out of the Oval Office, and has his summit meeting with Mr. Putin with no news media present except Tass."
"Republicans in Washington, many of them, exhibit all the symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome, identifying with their captor."
"In the federal budget, the two most important tasks are to cut spending and to cut taxes -- and cutting spending comes first."
19% flat tax on income, health care savings accounts, purchasing pharmaceuticals across state lines, letting veterans use medical marijuana, repealing the death tax, cutting capital gains taxes to 10%, bail reform, individual retirement accounts, no regime change abroad.
"there's a pressing need to act on climate change," rejoin the Paris climate accords. "If climate change is not addressed, our coastlines and those of all other countries will over time be obliterated by storm surge and the melting of the polar ice caps."
robust guest worker program, not necessarily path to citizenship, more & longer visas.
Abolish the Dept. of Education, support homeschooling & charter schools, allow for renegotiation of student debt.
First question: Why did you change parties? Second question: Why did you change parties?
Q: If you lose, will you support a Republican for president, or a Democrat?
A: "You know, I'm not sure about that...." Says could imagine supporting a third party, maybe independent, lotta time between now and then, maybe another interesting Republican runs, etc.
/fin. More later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday’s blowout school board recall in San Francisco was a far more interesting and resonant event than I was able to convey in this morning’s writeup. National implications, sure, but also plenty of glorious, only-in-SF specifics. Let's make a thread! reason.com/2022/02/16/san…
First of all, successful school board recalls, even in today’s political climate, are exceptionally rare. Only 23 states have the recall mechanism, and even though 2021 saw a record-shattering number of recall efforts (92), only 1 was successful. reason.com/2022/01/28/wil…
Recall co-organizer Autumn Looijen told me Monday, “Everyone we talked to said this is impossible. Look, out of every recall effort people talk about, 1 in 10 actually get started. Of those, 1 in 10 gets enough signatures to make the ballot, and of those only 1 in 10 passes."
Don't know how it all got started, but there's a clip being shared widely today of former MSNBC host @MHarrisPerry stating controversially in an April 2013 promo that, "we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents." I was around then.... 1/x
I think MHP was wrong about that. I’m not telling her that right now, I told her back then, in real time, as the first critic she brought on, days later, to explain why that rubbed people the wrong way. Here’s a clip and transcript. msnbc.com/melissa-harris… nbcnews.com/id/wbna51543915
You might note that it’s a friendly & empathetic disagreement & real exchange of views, including with future NYC mayoral candidate @mayawiley. That happy (IMO) fact was the *creation* of the very person being dragged today, & her great staff. There's an interesting lesson there.
Vaccine passports for domestic flights would require the creation of a national medical database, which holds ominous civil libertarian implications. All for a policy that would likely have a marginal public health impact. So yeah, it'll probably happen. reason.com/2021/12/28/fau…
If you think through the cost-benefit of airline vax passports for more than five seconds, the drawbacks start becoming obvious, as @christianbrits noted in October. reason.com/2021/10/05/cou…
"Freedom of movement within and between states is constitutionally protected. The right of Americans to travel interstate in the U.S. has never been substantially judicially questioned or limited," Meryl Justin Chertoff wrote last year. We'll see I guess. reason.com/2021/09/22/don…
One of the first questions that should have been asked, but wasn't, when the Treasury Dept. last month said it had a great new scheme for the IRS to collect $700 billion the next decade, is: What happened to Obama's 2009 scheme to collect $210 billion? reason.com/2021/06/09/bid…
Answer, 5 months later: Silicon Valley/Chamber o' Commerce wasn't having most of it:
"The Obama administration has shelved a plan to raise more than $200 billion in new taxes on multinational companies following a blitz of complaints from businesses."
Yes, that “Reality Czar” idea in the NYT was mockworthy. Still, those ideas are bouncing around among the people who have more power these days, so let’s work through them one by one. reason.com/2021/02/03/no-…
1) Truth & Reconciliation Commission? Those are found almost exclusively in countries that have suddenly transitioned from authoritarianism, with brand new laws, and an urgent need to deal with past crimes, property appropriation, & massive civil service change. This ain’t that.
2) Putting a government agency at the heart of capital-T Truth proliferation/adjudication? Politicians and agencies and governments are structurally incentivized to lie, and/or consider plenty of competing interests besides literal veracity. C’mon, man!