Profile picture
, 9 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Let's talk about the gag order Judge Berman Jackson put on the Roger Stone case. She's a very good judge and I'm a fan, but I'm not a fan of this order.

/1
/2 First: what does the order do? It's not an overall gag order. It has two parts:
1. The LAWYERS can't make public statements "that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case," and
2. The LAWYERS, PARTIES, and WITNESSES can't do so near the courthouse.
/3 So this does NOT prevent Roger Stone from being Roger Stone anywhere but on the courthouse steps.

The order is crafted to avoid the thornier constitutional problems.
/4 For instance, note that it limits the broad gag to the attorneys. Traditionally courts have more power over attorneys in matters before them, presenting less of a First Amendment issue.
/5 The narrower gag -- applying to hijinks on the courthouse steps -- applies to everyone. This takes advantage of a court's ability to have some control over its immediate vicinity with respect to conduct that could disrupt a case. Again, avoiding the thornier issues.
/6 My criticisms: first, Judge Berman Jackson claims it is to protect Stone's right to fair trial, but totally fails to engage the fact that Stone opposes the gag and wants to engage in the speech. That deserved analysis.
/7 My second criticism: the speech prohibited is hopelessly vague. What speech poses a "substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case?" I have no idea and I'm a First Amendment lawyer. The lawyers -- let alone the parties -- have to guess where the line is.
/8 That vagueness necessarily chills a broad range of speech, because you're left to wonder how the judge might later, in a contempt or sanctions proceeding, subjectively judge what speech causes substantial risk of material prejudice.
/9 In short: other than signalling Stone and Company to take their circus a few blocks away before and after court, I don't see how this order actually achieves anything, and it's way too vague to be useful (or, perhaps, enforceable later). /end
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to EmergenHat
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!