, 17 tweets, 10 min read Read on Twitter
This is a great, thought-provoking speech by #Draghi, on European sovereignty. Though I disagree with some parts, the final part on “rules vs. institutions” is excellent. A thread. ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date…
Draghi starts out with the alleged conflict between EU membership and #sovereignty, which is crucial to understand the populism of #Brexit, Le Pen et al. He says: no conflict at all, to the contrary.
“True #sovereignty is reflected not in the power of making laws – as a legal definition would have it – but in the ability to control #outcomes … The ability to make independent decisions does not guarantee countries such control,” says Draghi.
In the environment that we lived in, with globalization on many fronts affecting us all, [small and medium-sized] countries would need to work together to exercise sovereignty. #Draghi
The analytical part of Draghis speech contains three main arguments: how the EU protects against #spillovers; how it makes sure its members are not #rule-takers; and how they can protect #social standards without protectionism.
On the #euro, he argues that it limits spillovers from abroad (true), and goes on to argue that the pre-euro period, where everybody had to follow the #Bundesbank, was “disappointing, if not devastating”. (Well.)
The part on #regulatory power and sovereignty is great subtweeting of #Brexit delusions, and #Draghi is right that the EU (as a big global rule maker) can uphold its standards. Where his speech goes off the rails is on #taxation.
#Draghi *should* have argued that taxation is a great example how a failure to share sovereignty in the EU undermines everyone’s sovereignty, by allowing a race-to-the-bottom on corporate #taxes.
Instead, #Draghi argues that “the EU gives its members the capacity to prevent multinationals from avoiding corporation tax by exploiting loopholes or extracting subsidies.” I guess @gabriel_zucman, @Brad_Setser et al would beg to differ.
This is even more ironic, as #Draghi describes the mechanism of a race-to-the-bottom when it comes to social standards – but in the pre-Great Depression United States.
But now comes the best part of Draghis speech. On the *how * of cooperation. He says that loose #cooperation among nation-states is sustainable, when “all parties benefit equally”. But then:
The EU had two modes of cooperation, #Draghi says: create common institutions with executive power (EU Com on trade, #ECB on monetary policy) – or coordinating national policies through rules, such as the SGP. (You know where this is going, right?)
#Draghi says the rules-based approach were born out of the conviction that national sovereignty had to be preserved; common rules were the only choice. He adds: “But it is worthwhile to reflect on how successful this choice has been.” No shit.
#Draghi rightly argues that institutions vs. rules had a clear winner: #institutions. Not because of lower ability of national governments, of course not. He gives two reasons.
First, #institutions can use discretion when circumstances change. (Cf. the economic anachronism that is the German debt brake.) And the use of this discretion enhanced #credibility, says #Draghi. “By contrast, rules lose credibility if they are applied with discretion.”
Second, #institutions can be subject to democratic control (ie are accountable). Rules are not. The combination of “mandate and defined powers” enabled a direct link between decisions and responsibility, acc to #Draghi.
I will end this thread with #Draghis conclusions on #sovereignty and the future of the EU, which I share. /end
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Christian Odendahl
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!