, 5 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
I'm sure, the more I think about it, that I am right here. At no point does Barr establish a negative "the SCO found they did not collude". It's the other way around. "The SCO did not establish collusion" "did not find" "did not determine" -- because it CAN'T. Crimes need trials!
It fits perfectly with what is in Barr's letter if the Mueller Report is a damning "indictment" of Team Treason on collusion, with each member referred for trial. Because an indictment is not a conviction. How could Mueller say Don Jr colluded with Russia ***BEFORE A TRIAL***?
He can't! No prosecutor could! Only a jury can convict on a serious crime! The Mueller Report will read like one giant @FBI indictment, and Mueller will say he did not establish collusion he referred these cases for trial!

Like A Few Good Men..."The witness has rights!" :)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Louise Mensch
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!