Riggs_Bud Profile picture
Mar 25, 2019 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1. $TMO acquires viral vector manufacturer Brammer Bio for $1.7b cash. Company on track for $250m in Revs in 2017 (6.8x). $0.10 EPS accretion implies ~$40m of Net Income (16% margins). Will grow 25% over the mid-term.
2. This implies ~$750m in Revenues in five years. Margins will expand within TMO. 25% Net Income margins in five years would generate $190m of Net Income. Good for an 11% ROIC.
3. Strategically this is an important acquisition for $TMO in response to the pending $GE/ $DHR deal. Viral vectors are the delivery vehicle for Regenerative Medicine. They enable therapy to target specific cells within the body. Image
4. $GE/ $DHR products are more centered around bioreactors, filtration, and cryo/thaw. This is the nuts and bolts of the manufacturing process. Will be interesting to see whether this leadership is more valuable than $TMO's position as a manufacturer.
5. $TMO with a pitchbook about capabilities within Regen Med Space. Dynabeads are currently being used in 30 different trials.

tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/br… ImageImage
6. Regen Med is clearly area of focus for LS Tools players and they are willing to pay for that exposure. Has to be viewed as a positive for $BRKS $BLFS $CYRX $LONN CH

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Riggs_Bud

Riggs_Bud Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Riggs_Bud

Sep 24, 2019
Very interesting amendment to merger between $ILMN and $PACB. $ILMN paying $6m a month to extend. The way I am reading it, Financing is non-recourse unless they raise $100m within two years. Plus they owe $PACB $98m if deal gets terminated? Sound right? Image
Indicates two things: 1) $ILMN is very motivated to close this deal. 2) Management believes the deal gets approved.

Why fund a competitor for up to 6 months if they aren't having constructive dialogue with regulators?
Read 42 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(