Profile picture
, 40 tweets, 6 min read Read on Twitter
Thread: Don’t Believe the Democrat and Media Spin on the Mueller Report!

1. For over two years, we have heard elected Democrats and their legacy media allies screaming that @POTUS “colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election from the sainted Shillary.”
2. [“Sainted Shrillary”: is that the most ridiculous oxymoron you’ve ever seen? If anything, she’s a disciple of the Devil given all the felonies she’s gotten away with (so far)!]
3. Elected Democrats like Schiff, Swalwell, Lieu, Blumenthal, Cummings, Nadler, and a host of others have INSISTED multiple times in public statements and television interviews that there was a “mountain of evidence proving Trump was a traitor” and/or a Putin puppet.
4. And they aren’t backing down at all despite the summary of the Mueller report provided them by AG Barr. Both Nadler (House Judiciary Chairman) and Shifty Schiff (House Intel Chairman) insist that they’re going to continue investigations into collusion and obstruction.
5. Their goal has ALWAYS been to create enough doubt in the public’s minds in order to depress the president’s approval numbers and give Democrats the political cover needed to force his impeachment.
6. As lifelong Democrat Alan Dershowitz pointed out, Mueller “chickened out” with his ambiguous non-conclusion on obstruction of justice, leaving a political opening for House Democrats to exploit despite the AG’s conclusion that there was none.
7. I look forward to Trumpenfreude to be meted out to all of those rotten Democrats in due course. They shall reap what the sow – in this case investigations into their own despicable behavior – and almost certain crimes! But I’m getting ahead of myself.
8. What did AG Barr’s summary letter actually conclude? Here are the highlights:
A. There was ZERO evidence of the main allegation that led to the assignment of the special counsel from the start, i.e., that the Trump campaign “colluded with Russia” to influence the 2016 election
8. (cont'd)
B. There was “insufficient evidence” generated during the Special Counsel’s investigation to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
8. (cont'd)
C. Additionally, there are no pending indictments of people not yet named, including no sealed indictments.
D. No Americans were charged with “colluding with Russia” to influence the 2016 campaign.
9. It should be noted that Mueller’s investigation was conducted by a staff of 19 lawyers and 40 FBI agents, lasted 675 days, produced 500 search warrants, interviewed 500 witnesses, and spent over $25M.
10. And after all that time and effort, they could come up with NO legitimately prosecutable evidence for obstruction despite all the subpoenas, interviews, and other actions taken!
11. Here are some pertinent quotes from AG Barr’s letter summarizing Mueller’s report:

<quote>
12. [On Russian collusion] The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
13. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
14. … the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.
15. [On obstruction of justice] The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion — one way or the other — as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.
16. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question & leaves unresolved what theSC views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.
17. The Special Counsel’s report states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
18. After reviewing the Special Counsel’s final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, ….
18A. … Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
19. In cataloguing the President’s actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, ….
19A. … and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department’s principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense.

<unquote>
20. The text of the entire report is available here (as well as many other places if you don’t wish to give Vox.com a mouse click; Google searches pop left-wing media to the top like usual, and that’s a story for another thread!!): vox.com/2019/3/24/1827…
21. Sorry, Dems, but in plain language that reads like total vindication to me. And that’s not just my interpretation – virtually every sane legal mind has concluded similarly, ….
21A. … including former Special Counsel Ken Starr, Democrat legal schaolar Alan Dershowitz, and constitutional expert Mark Levin!
22. I totally support the president’s statement that the whole investigation was part of an “illegal take-down” that needs to be thoroughly investigated. You just KNOW that he wanted to say the phrase “coup attempt” instead! And he has a right to be furious about what transpired.
23. So what was the evidence that warranted the investigation by a special counsel? Clearly there was NONE! We have subsequently learned that the fake dossier – generated through Shillary’s opposition research via Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS – was the primary “evidence” used.
24 In other words, the Obama DoJ and FBI knowingly used fabricated evidence to perpetrate a soft coup on a sitting US president with the assistance of a two-year special counsel investigation convened under false pretenses!
25. These kinds of actions don’t just magically happen on their own. The decision-making involved had to go straight to the top of the Obama White House!
26. Questions that need to be answered on the record by Obama and the rest include, “What did you know, when did you know it, and why did you authorize this witch hunt based on fabricated evidence?”
27. It’s long past time to “investigate the investigators” and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law for sedition and other crimes, given what we’ve already seen disclosed in the testimony and texts of people like Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker, Ohr, and others.
28. I believe the table has been set for just that eventuality. The special counsel was allowed to run its course, lulling the cabal to sleep in the meantime while other investigations were taking place. The SC report concluded no Russian collusion, and there was no obstruction.
29 With the specter of obstruction now completely gone, an Establishment Republican (the Bushite William Barr) was picked as AG to carry the baton through the prosecution stage.
30. The next earth-shaking event will be the declassification of the fraudulent FISA warrant application which will lay bare the multiple crimes committed by the cabal and others.
31. Then, the OIG report that looked into #Spygate itself will be released (and another on DoJ leaking!) with numerous referrals for prosecution by the DoJ. And we’ll finally see the return of real justice at DoJ!
32. And elected Republican like Lindsey Graham, Jim Jordan, John Ratcliffe, Doug Collins, and others are going to have a field day in nailing their Democrat colleagues for lying and slander in the coming weeks.
33. I hope Graham subpoenas Mueller and ask him how long he knew that there was no Russia collusion, too, as I am certain Mueller et al knew early on in their “investigation” but sat on it for nearly two years!
34. The Democrats just can’t accept the results of the 2016 election are a doubling down on investigating the president despite his exoneration by the Mueller report and the AG and DAG’s letter! The Democrats are simply not to be believed despite their obvious spinning!
35. All the crooks you’ve seen on CNN, MSNBC and elsewhere in the legacy media who were adamant that “Trump is a traitor” are going down, folks, including their paid media who were all part of the conspiracy. Well played, Mr. President! ///The end.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Stu Cvrk
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!