, 13 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
Tim, Tim, @TimWilsonMP - we’ve been through this:
-80% of the $6bn Australia spends on cash payments for #FrankingCredits goes to the wealthiest 20% of retirees
-50% of the total benefits go to the wealthiest 10% of SMSFs, with balances of $2.4m+

I wrote a helpful 🧵for you 👇
More women get cash for #FrankingCredits than men is because high-wealth households put passive income in the hands of the lower-marginal tax-rate person. On average, this is a woman.

In short, the wealthy use #FrankingCredits as a tax loophole.
Further:
-The top 1% of SMSFs by fund balance received a cash refund of $83,000 (on average) - an amount greater than the average full time salary.
-10% of the wealthiest households in 2015-16 owned nearly three quarters of the value of all shares in Australia.
Further:
Very few people with a *low taxable income* will be affected by Labor’s policy because most retirees in the retirement phase of their lifecycle have *no taxable income* because of the concessional tax treatment of superannuation payments.
Claiming someone receiving cash payments for #FrankingCredits has *low taxable income* and is doing it tough overlooks the fact that their superannuation payments are tax free, and therefore a very low taxable income easily masks a very high income, assets and wealth.
For example: A self-funded retiree couple with $3.2m in super, plus their own home, & $200k in Aust shares held outside super.
Even drawing $130k/year in super income & $15k/year in dividend income, they would report a combined taxable income of just $15k & pay no income tax.
Also, your side of politics doesn’t believe in gender analysis for tax & financial impacts. Don’t you follow what @ScottMorrisonMP says? June 2018: “The tax system doesn’t discriminate by gender. It’s an absolutely ridiculous proposition”
If you really want to do some gender analysis:
-In the 2014 Budget the Liberals cut $1bn from pensioner concession & axed the $900 seniors supplement to self-funded retirees receiving the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card

How did that affect older women @TimWilsonMP ?
-In 2015 the Liberals did a deal with the Greens to cut the pension to around 370,000 pensioners by as much as $12,000 a year by changing the pension assets test. 

How did that affect older women @TimWilsonMP ?
-The Liberals kept the Medicare freeze in place, and cut aged care funding, leading to a blow out in the waiting list for home care places.

How did that affect older women @TimWilsonMP ?
The Libs still want to axe the Energy Supplement to 2 million people, incl around 400,000 age pensioners – a cut of $14.10/fortnight to single pensioners. Couple pensioners will be $21.20/fortnight worse off.

How will that affect older women @TimWilsonMP ?
Looking forward to hearing your gender analysis on these key impacts on older women @TimWilsonMP
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Kristina Keneally
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!