, 18 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
From a former low-key white supremacist:

It is not always immediately productive to debate low-key white supremacists. Do not expect to see quick results.

But the most effective thing you can do is force them to confront what it is that they actually believe, and why.
I wrote a big thread about the lies right-wingers tell and how they tell them, obviously, and you should read it if you have the time.
However, how do you deprogram people who've fallen victim to white supremacist propaganda?

Well, the thing with right-wing ideologies is that they work largely by making people believe something without actually realising it, and using a lot of deceptive language to do it.
You'll see a lot of right wingers say things whose meaning is unclear.

"I don't hate black people, I just dislike black culture."

Well, what do they mean by black culture? What elements are disliked? Why do they dislike those elements? Why is that a valid justification?
Consider something I see bewilderingly often: "capitalism is the natural state of humanity."

What do they actually think capitalism is? Who gets to define what is and isn't "natural?" How are they defining it?
A lot of the stuff right-wingers say is hard to understand or pin down because - and I do not say this lightly - *they do not fully understand the things they're saying.*

And they don't fully understand the things they're saying because there's a problem with their beliefs.
A person who thinks "I don't hate black people, I just dislike black culture" absolves them from racism could really only think that by not understanding history or politics at all.

The idea of having an "inferior culture" has been used as an excuse for racism for millennia.
A person who says "I don't hate black people, I just dislike black culture" has still associated a certain type of behaviour with a skin colour, without understanding why those associations exist.
A person who says that they support voter ID laws ONLY because they prevent non-citizens from voting has to maintain perfect ignorance of the closure of DMVs in predominantly ethnic-minority neighbourhoods for that statement to be true - and will often fight to do just that.
A person who says that "black people should fight racism by more completely assimilating into American culture" already has ideas about what "completely assimilating" and "American culture" mean, even if they're not totally aware of what they are.

Ask them what they truly mean.
When right-wingers say "you choose whether to take offence to the n-word," they have to quietly ignore that the main reason white people say it in the first place is because they KNOW it causes offence.

Nobody can honestly claimed to be SHOCKED to learn the n-word is offensive.
The reason that right wingers so ferociously claim to defend free speech (when, universally, they don't) is because they... sort of KNOW that the things they believe are difficult to sell to other people?

But they might not actually understand why that is.
Right-wingers do... KIND OF understand that their views are offensive and discriminatory, and people might want to shut them down. But I genuinely believe some of them when they say they don't understand why.

Because sometimes they really don't.
If you don't understand your own beliefs, like I didn't in my mid-20s, you genuinely might not understand why people get so upset by them.

"Why are people so afraid of the truth? Why are they so afraid of frank discussion?"

It's because beliefs have real-life consequences.
The belief that black people are inherently less intelligent or more violent leads to the sort of discrimination that deprives black communities of educational and economic opportunities and causes police to react more aggressively and less forgivingly to black people.
Right-wingers insist on a very Kantian outlook on political policy (appropriate, since Kant was a huge racist) in that it's only the intent of a policy that matters, not its outcome.

Less brown people voting? Doesn't matter, intent was to decrease illegal voting, so not racist.
.@InnuendoStudios obviously did a very good video on this whole subject already, which you should also watch

Trying to disprove a person's beliefs with evidence can often backfire (it's literally called the "backfire effect"), and this is especially true of right-wingers.

However, forcing a person to confront what it is that they actually believe? It's, at the very least, much easier.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to VƎX, Dimir Mastermind
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!