The plot, as they say, just THICKENED, didn't it?
"Priestap testified in a separate lawsuit that Clinton was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts."
"HILLARY CLINTON" and "GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION" would've been in my headline.
2) GJ is investigating MULTIPLE EMAIL ACCOUNTS she had on her Blackberry device
3) I'm pretty sure this Blackberry device was NOT gov't issued/secure/encrypted
4) Blackberry's email servers are not gov't secure/encrypted
Any emails sent to/from that device have been recovered.
She does not have control over the Blackberry corporation, so that means when somebody discovered her multiple email accounts on her Blackberry device, they were able to go find all the emails Blackberry had stored.
Listen up: Horowitz's MYE investigation was into the *FBI'S CONDUCT* in handling the Clinton email investigation.
He didn't empanel a grand jury to investigate that.
THIS DOESN'T INVOLVE THE PRIVATE SERVER AT ALL. THIS WOULD BE NEW.
Gregory Craig once WAS the subject of a grand jury investigation.
Alas, now he no longer is.
DO YOU KNOW WHY?
A grand jury also ends it's investigation when it RETURNS AN INDICTMENT.
Let me give you an example of this I'm already 100% positive about:
The sealed indictment/s relating to ANDREW MCCABE.
Andrew McCabe engaged in illegal leaking, was investigated by the DOJ IG, admitted to MULTIPLE acts of perjury to OIG investigators, was fired, referred for criminal prosecution.
Well after that, PUBLICLY, as far as the DOJ/AG goes, NOTHING.
No public announcement of a US Attorney assigned? ✔️
No public announcement of a grand jury empaneled? ✔️
Is it, like, a mental glitch or something?
1) James Wolfe
2) Natalie Edwards
3) John Fry
4) Meng Wangzhou
5) Andrew McCabe
6) James Baker
Go head, I'll wait.
[humming to myself]
and pay attention here!
...why the DOJ isn't doing something that is ALMOST NEVER DOES.
And yet morons pester me endlessly about WHY ISN'T THE DOJ BEING COMPLETELY OPEN AND TRANSPARENT ABOUT THESE INVESTIGATIONS, WHEN THEY START, ETC?
Which means they DON'T listen to people who insist this should've all been done openly & transparently
Hell no the DOJ is *not* going to announce they've opened a grand jury investigation of Hillary Clinton's multiple email accounts on her Blackberry, not going to announce when/if that GJ is finished, and if it indicted & if that indictment is sealed.
The signs are EVERYWHERE if you know how to read them.
Gee, kinda funny how that laptop keeps popping up, isn't it? 🤔
Hillary had all Sec State work-related emails under Congressional subpoena when she defied that subpoena, erased over 30k emails and wiped/destroyed the server & multiple devices.
BUT the Weiner laptop has 49,000 Clinton *server* emails on it.
So US Attorneys looking to this don't have just ONE source for HRC emails besides the private server; they have TWO sources