"Carbon capture & storage "could still hike the cost of electricity for consumers by 30 percent."
That is why they want to hold on to the "net" zero fairy tale.
"If coal were abandoned as a primary fuel source, massive new developments in solar, wind and other renewable sources would be needed to fill the hole.
That could cost twice as much as widespread implementation of carbon capture and sequestration."
This is why #ExtinctionObedience uses the net zero terminology.