I'm late to this, but I'll play. So you want names.

Off the top of my head, YOU, John MacArthur, James White, Phil Johnson, Doug Wilson, Jordan Hall, Josh Buice, Tom Ascol, and every other public figure who has made a cottage industry out of fighting “Social Justice,” ... 1/
2/ ... claiming those who are driving the race conversation are “sowing division,” are damaging the gospel, are “Cultural Marxists,” don’t believe in Biblical authority, are only following Critical Race theory, Liberation theology, and worldly ethics; those who make and ...
3/ ... sign ignorant statements meant to shut down discussion and alienate; those who write whole series on how black Americans are just playing the victim and want white people’s money; those who continue to defend their racist theological heroes at all costs because they ...
4/ ... “got the gospel right” (contradictorily) and they were just men of their times; those who have no qualms quoting evil men from the pulpit because they said something theologically profound; those who believe that Europeans are and have been the protectors of orthodoxy ...
5/ ... and that black churches are and have always been gospel deficient; those who love to argue every other day that MLK was a heretical womanizer; those who blame black Americans themselves for society wide disparities, suggesting they are (I guess) greater sinners than ...
6/ ... white people; those who show none of the compassion of Christ towards those within our own faith who long to have the pain acknowledge. And it is not only you and they, it is all the little sycophantic followers who slander their Christian bothers for addressing any ...
7/ ... other systemic sin than just abortion and whose every other tweet is right wing political propaganda. How about those who appear to sit around and wait for folks like Dr. Bradley to say something they can dunk on and get hearts from their co-religionists.
8/ It should also include the thousands of Kinists floating around, all with “Calvinist,” “Reformed,” or “Presbyterian” in their bio—they go to church somewhere, my friend, and they pretty much tell us where. It also includes all the "Narrow Spirituality of the Church" folks ...
9/ and Radical 2K’ers who rail against anyone believing the Church has any social responsibility beyond preaching and sacraments, WesCal professors (oh yes, names: R. Scott Clark) and Southern Machen Warriors alike. It includes whole groups like Sovereign Nations, AOMin, ...
10/ ... GTY (including *gasp* assimilationists like Darrel Harrison), Pulpit & Pen, Reformation Charlotte, and other trash that you and yours don’t mind sharing if it calls the right person a Marxist or heretic. And it’s even Presbyterian aggregators like The Aquila Report.
11/ Oh, and we better not leave out all the White Knights working tirelessly behind the scenes to oust good Christian men like Joel McDurmon from American Vision, or Mohler and Duncan from Ligonier. (Just thought of another name: Burk Parsons).
12/ Yeah, I get it—you all condemn white supremacy in any form. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So did Cotton Mather, George Whitefield, Robert Dabney, James Thornwell, J. G. Machen, Morton Smith, Nelson Bell, Bob Jones, and on and on and on, so I’m not particularly impressed.
13/ (Boy do I have a list of quotes for you from enslavers and segregationists of the past employing "there is no Jew and Gentile" to oppose abolition and integration. Let me know if you want to see.)
14/ You don’t have to put on a white hood to feather a bed for a klansman.
15/ See, the point is not that you defend White Supremacy by arguing for white supremacy, but that you and the many I mentioned have, for whatever reason, decided to take an active and incessant role in making sure there is a comfortable lodging place for those who do.
16/ I mean, be honest: wouldn’t you go to the most conservative evangelical church possible if you were a card-carrying White Supremacist? Where else will you hear racists quoted from the pulpit with honor?
17/ Where else will it nearly be considered a sin to explicate Biblical passages as condemning racist American history or addressing systemic racism? Where else could you be assured that you will only hear a narrow gospel of salvation and afterlife with social questions off ...
18/ the table? Let’s be serious about this. Those are names and orgs. Why not take the anti-racists off your hit-list and put the “White Supremacist Ideology, Overt or Covert, Not Welcome In Evangelicalism” sign up on the conservative church doors, for all to see, ...
19/ ... rather than the “Weeelll, It’s So Complicated and There’s A Lot of Factors, and the Church Shouldn’t be in the Social Business Anyhow” sign. (And from what I’ve seen, that last sign would actually even be a move in the right direction.)
20/20 I say this all as a conservative Reformed evangelical who is a member in good standing of a historic Reformed denomination for my entire adult life. Take it for what you will.
21/20 And from the first question I received from the thread, it appears I was unclear: the point is not that any of these men support White Supremacy (they don't); but all, I'd argue, have a hand in making conservative evangelicalism a pretty safe place to harbor such views.
And P.S.: I don't think the anti-semite shooter was radicalized by his church. I have said nothing about it at all. But when I saw how sanctimonious these defenders of the tribe became, I couldn't help but name the names. Hence, I'm responding to JP, not current events.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bradly Mason

Bradly Mason Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlsoACarpenter

Feb 20
1/3 The bar for folks like @NeilShenvi is quite simple:

1. Accurately define and/or describe CRT according to its creators and practitioners.

2. By 1 (and that is key), either (a) demonstrate that it is "complete" in the mathematical sense, viz., that use of any part entails
2/3 the whole, or (b) demonstrate that every component of CRT is unique to CRT, and therefore the component's use implicates the whole.

3. Finally, by 1 and 2 (again, that is key), demonstrate that CRT NECESSARILY (not could, might, sometimes, can be used to, is associated with,
3/3 or as so construed) entails and/or logically requires a belief or beliefs which logically contradict the Gospel.

Anything short of this is fallacious: straw man, guilt by association, the fallacy of composition, hasty generalization, and/or affirming the consequent.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 17
In light of the Evangelical Illiterati's continued attacks on @JemarTisby, I would like to encourage you to purchase and read his honest and God honoring books, if you haven't already.

First, The Color of Compromise:
amazon.com/dp/0310113601/… Image
Second, How to Fight Racism:
amazon.com/dp/0310104777/…
And third, for the kids, How to Fight Racism Young Reader's Addition:
amazon.com/dp/0310751047/…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
Unfortunately, this tweet will be taken by far to many White Americans as confirmation of their belief that the difficulties and disparities confronting African Americans is a familial pathology within their own culture.

This "explanation" was largely popularized by Nathan 1/
2/ Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan (the first a Harvard professor and the latter a U.S. Senator) in the 1960s.

It's helpful to compare Moynihan's diagnosis and prescription with Dr. King's in the same era.

The celebrated Moynihan Report (1963) gave the language and
3/ justification for inaction and victim blaming to Nixon in particular, and the U.S. at large.

Moynihan blamed the difficulties in the Black community on the supposedly pathological Black family. We read that the

“Negro family is the fundamental source of the weakness of the
Read 20 tweets
Feb 13
I can think of little that is more divisive than spending 5 years daily telling Christians that every form of antiracism, except that which is acceptable to White conservatives, is incompatible with the Gospel, especially after 400 years legal, economic, & social White supremacy.
The spark of desire throughout our nation to achieve racial justice could've been embraced by White evangelicals as a cause dear to the heart of Jesus, but instead it was attacked on the very same terms that enslavers & segregationists used to oppose abolitionism and integration.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
Throughout my writing, I happily treat the Scripture as free of error, yet culturally embodied, subject to my own misinterpretation, & containing many statements & ideas that SEEM weird, difficult, & even wrong that cause me to say, "here is truth, but I don't yet get it." 1/
2/ But when I think, "okay, this just seems wrong," it's not because I believe it is, but because I'm trying to apply the analogy of faith, seeking to see how it fits with the Scripture's overarching presentation of God in all His love, purity, compassion, and generosity.
3/ As a result, there are many passages I have come to understand by listening to others who are very different from me, outside of my own tradition and social location, allowing them to peel away assumptions I did not know I had.

Yet there are other passages I still am
Read 6 tweets
Dec 27, 2021
I am among those who eschew "worldview" talk, and always have. Inasmuch as it means something like "the way you generally see things" or even "belief system," I think it's pretty straightforward. But it is often used by apologists to be some sort of totalized system of ideas, 1/
2/ answering all "basic" (doing a lot of work here!) questions, and I dare say every truth in the set is treated as a theorem. As such, contradicting one piece contradicts the whole, and accepting one piece requires acceptance of the whole.
3/ To me, this is just some strange Josiah Roycian idealistic nonsense. Nothing like this exists for flesh and blood humans. And I'd argue further that whatever we do have that is closest to this idealistic nonsense is something that we literally ALL ALREADY SHARE.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(