MUELLER RIGGED GRAND JURIES FOR DECADES
"DoJ and Judiciary have become lawless. Many are demanding grand juries be abolished"
“belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people” citing U.S. v. Williams (1992).
😁👉Here is another not 2 miss Mueller thread on another topic!
"Fig. 1—Gabriel, McKibben. (Apr. 30, 2019). Mueller Hides Key Evidence - HUGE FINDINGS!!! American Intelligence Media, Americans for Innovation.
Video: American Intelligence Media, Americans for Innovation, Leader Technologies, Inc."
"By relying on Williams to withhold evidence, Mueller played his long held trump card and proved he should have recused himself due to the appearance of impropriety as an author of the bogus Williams opinion on which he now relies."
"and now the Trump-Russia Hoax. The pattern is clear. False Flag events are covered up by rigged grand juries."
"The Supreme Court in Williams ruled along political lines that a DoJ special prosecutor could withhold “exculpatory evidence” and persecute innocent victims."
"Justice Stevens dissented saying “[I]t blinks reality to say that the grand jury can adequately perform this important historic role if it is intentionally misled by the prosecutor.”
"The original case against entrepreneur investor John H. Williams, Jr. was contrived by the DoJ from the start. The fact that it made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court is a testament to a conspiracy between the DoJ and Judiciary to get the precedent they wanted."
The DoJ filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. They argued that a special prosecutor was not required to disclose exculpatory evidence. "
The 5:4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings, but Mueller had his sound byte (and used it in his Report).
That’s where this trail went ice cold." 😡
The records were scubbed...😁
The district court docket has been removed. Zilch. Nada. None of the district court records are available in either Pacer or LEXIS NEXIS. Other records in other cases at that time are there, but not Williams."
"This is all the more concerning because it would include the records of the case after it came back from the Supreme Court for further consideration on the firm evidence that the special prosecutor had withheld from the grand jury."
"The first telltale sign of DoJ and Judicial misconduct at the U.S. Supreme Court are the government attorneys who argue the case:
(1) Kenneth R. Starr,
(2) Robert S. Mueller, III,
(3) William C. Bryson and
(4) Michael R. Dreeben."