“.. तब तब मैंने खुद का सृजन किया, साधुओं के उद्धार और बुरे कर्म करने वालो के संहार के लिए..” Can you pl explain where Madhu ma’am was wrong? FYI Krishna says if he himself being “the destroyer” in BG. Read👇🏼
ऋतेऽपि त्वां न भविष्यन्ति सर्वे
येऽवस्थिताः प्रत्यनीकेषु योधाः।।11.32।।
Translation for you in image.
The first recorded usage of the suffix ism as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the 19th century it was being used by Thomas Carlyle to signify a pre-packaged ideology
Religion is institutions while Dharma is to strive to be right. Dharma tells to reject institution which shows wrong path.
means King’s Duty not Religion.
You have failed to understand the truth of the words and subscribed to myths as facts.
1)”Hindu”is a ethno-geographic connotation & not religious at all.
2)Hinduism is an oxymoron though we use it for popularity.Often addition of -ism degrades the great “Hindu-values”.
Hindutva is formed by adding -tva suffix (Pratyay) to Hindu. Now, what do you understand by -tva? In plain language adding -tva (ness) to a noun means :in state of being that noun. Eg. Naritva.
So @acjoshi sir, can you please explain how the ‘state of being “Hindu(Indian” ‘ be wrong at all.
Who are we to interpret “Hindu” per comfort if Darius-I, the first one to use word had defined it other way.
I’m sorry to say sir but by quoting this you have again exposed your flawed understanding of “Bharata”. Read👇🏼