Suggests she should make one. Some guys tell her to fuck off, her husband starts bragging about how much money he makes to win an internet argument about it, 50 women start circling the wagons and calling men toxic incel racist bigot mean words galore.
I don't think women realize how much professional and personal trouble women have been to most men's lives.
My first ship, 30 people in my department over the first 3 years
Every guy had an allegation against them, 4 separate incidents and only 1 was even close to meritorious... She didn't want to hear about a co workers sexual exploits during sea watches, that's fair.
10 accusations because a different girl got drunk and cried, felt embarrassed and accused them if harassment. Then tried charging them again for never hanging out with her outside of work (go figure)
Spitz has found that infants deprived of handling over a long period will tend at length to sink into an irreversible decline and are prone to ... intercurrent disease ... emotional deprivation can have a fatal outcome
...
The most favoured forms of stimuli are those provided by physical intimacy
I think about the RP concepts of delayed adolescence and the damage of physical deprivation combine to explain a lot of the rise in what is called antisocial behavior in men and over socialized behavior in women.
Men become animePFP trolls and women become clout chasing hoes
On going without:
Under most conditions he will compromise. To do with more subtle, even symbolic, forms of handling, until the merest nod of recognition may serve the purpose to some extent, although his original craving for physical contact may remain unabated.
You think this because you're stupid. It's not your fault.
When someone starts looking up and away like that it means they are making stuff up. When they check the chat before they speak it means they are fine tuning audience pander.
Bragging about a science/psych education yet handwave away SSRI's and the replication crisis it means you're either ignorant, or willfully deceptive
When you screw up the premise of a 1000 year old philosophical concept in order to sound horrific it means you react, not think
The reason that is my one (and likely only) debate is because I don't like disingenuous people who argue for the sake of it and treat deception as better than fact.
Their only purpose is to dance like a clown, but without acknowledging there's even a circus.