Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture
May 20, 2019 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
While @PeteButtigieg was brave for going on @foxnews, his appearance showed why no dem should. He received a standing ovation - you think THAT would be discussed more by Fox. Nope -they called him a "clown" and lied that he said he wanted to take Jefferson out of history books.
@PeteButtigieg @FoxNews ...people are saying "fox would have done it anyway" and the people who watched the event know he did well.

Miss the point. One number watched the event, then millions in addition watched the lies. Why did they bother? Because Trump raged about Fox giving Pete a platform...
@PeteButtigieg @FoxNews ...which means, no matter what is done, to satisfy Trump, these people will have to immediately tear apart any democrat who appears. If they don't appear, they are signaling to ALL democrats to stay away from this rathole that feigns being a journalistic enterprise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Eichenwald

Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kurteichenwald

Oct 26
As someone who has been a journalist for almost 40 year, working as a senior writer at the New York Times, Newsweek, etc, the decision by @WilliamLewis, a Murdoch alum, to cripple the @washingtonpost by abandoning endorsements, is one of the most craven actions I've ever seen../1
...taken in the industry. Make no mistake, this wasn't just cowardice. It was @WilliamLewis and perhaps @JeffBezos dragging a now-once great paper into the sewer because of their own political beliefs. If Lewis et al wanted to abandon endorsements, fine. But you don't do it.../2
@WilliamLewis @JeffBezos ...days one of the most consequential elections in history. We have on one side a convicted felon, deemed an ignorant fascist by his own people, who half this country believes is, in fact, a fascist, and on the other side a woman half the country believes is a communist.../3
Read 14 tweets
Sep 16
Make no mistake: The "Haitians are stealing your pets to eat them" lie is a variant of the blood libel that Jews have faced for centuries: In that, Jews are stealing Christian babies to use their blood bake food (Matzah).

Trump and Vance are lying about legal residents..../1
....accusing them of stealing beloved members of the family, and eating them. The point of the Haitian Blood Libel is the same as the original Blood Libel: To create an "other," to unify the hateful and ignorance against an imaginary enemy in their midst, all to seize power.../2
...so please, stop calling the attack on lawful American residents from Haiti as a "lie." Call it was it is: The #HaitianBloodLibel generated by Trump and Vance. A century ago they would have used Jews. And Fox News would have been the May 1934 volume of Der Stürmer.../3
Read 4 tweets
Aug 26
The appeal filed by Jack Smith on Judge Cannon's dismissal of the classified documents cased underscores an embarrassment that should not exist in modern times, things that were evident in her ruling. Cannon is clearly either stupid or corrupt..../1
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
...there are SO many elements to her nonsense in her ruling that have been just jaw dropping (ruling that past participles are the same as past tense, and on and on) but Smith thankfully points out the two that most annoyed me: She described what was the central finding in.../2
...US v Nixon as nothing more than "unpersuasive dicta." In fact, it was the foundation of the SCOTUS ruling and had been fully briefed by both sides. Second, she used the TITLE of a statute to overrule what the statute said, even though it includes an explicit statement.../3
Read 6 tweets
Aug 25
I have been holding my tongue for a long time, but I am SICK of self-identified evangelicals saying they read things in the Bible that 1. Aren't there or 2. Are being massively misrepresented and 3. DO happen to be garbage appearing on Facebook posts. I am writing this only.../1
...because these are the same kinds of people who misquote or cherry pick the Bible to justify their hatreds and self-worship. Worse, they say it with such self-confidence that other evangelicals (who are constantly found in polls to be the most Biblically illiterate, worse..../2
...than atheists. Mormon's know it best, even though their scripture if the Book of Mormon.) Anyway, here is the latest on the Holiness of Trump "based" on the Bible. It comes from Lee Greenwood and Ted Nugent's wife who says she "read" her claims in the Bible. (She didn't)..
Read 16 tweets
Aug 9
Trump's lies sometimes involve a series of events from his past blended together into one where he is the center of the universe. His lie about going down in a helicopter with Willy Brown:
1. Three of his executives went down in a helicopter in 1988 and died. (Trump lied that...1
...he was supposed to be on that flight but backed out at the last second.)
2. He met with Willie Brown in the 1980s.
3. He flew in a helicopter with Jerry Brown (and Gavin Newsom) during his presidency, during which he fretted that the helicoptercopter would go down.

While..2
...like I said, he often blends stories into one where he is at the center of an adventure or he is the hero of the tale, this one is so bizarre that I suspect we are watching an increasing dementia, which is in the family. Someone with a habit of blending memories...3
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
That SCOTUS overruling ANOTHER precedent - this one that established the Chevron doctrine, which has been cited in literally thousands of federal cases - was signaled by the court in 2022. Then I said the ruling in West Virginia v. EPA was the most important in decades.../1
...because it showed that the conservatives were gearing up to take regulatory administration out of the hands of experts and place it in the hands of the political hacks that now occupy our courts . It is an obscene power grab by this court, which has already ripped away.../2
...the authority of Congress, state legislatures, state courts etc. whenever it wants to drive policy. No precedent is safe. Stare decisis is over. This is an activist court unlike any in our country's history.

Mark Lemley broke down the court's imperial power grabs, and how..3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(