Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture
May 20, 2019 19 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1. I found a letter this weekend that reminded me of an interesting event from 1991 that did not reveal until now. It might seem like nothing, but to me it is a demonstration of what is wrong with journalism - reporters don't know what they dont know, and dont try to find out....
2...the reason I use this as an example is because it involves good reporters acting in real life without ever thinking they might not know the whole story.

So, in 1991, the publisher at the @nytimes announced the company was starting a clothing drive that was very complex...
@nytimes 3...this wasn't just "bring in clothes" - it was an entire system where clothes arrived packaged and sorted and were at the loading dock, piled into a shipping truck, within an hour, then off to a delivery location by that same afternoon. Drop off points were on every floor....
@nytimes 4...in movable bins right next to the elevator. The bins disappeared everyday within an hour. This was a hassle-free system where a small number of people did tons of work. Over the course of the first year, it collected 2 tons of clothing.

The theme, as expressed by the....
@nytimes 5...publisher, was that everyone had clothes in their closets they never wore, that this was like the old story of stone soup, where everyone could contribute a little and make something great.

There were multiple people who were responsible throughout the newsroom for....
@nytimes 6...reminding people to bring in clothes. The person in my area kept reminding me, aware that I had never brought in anything. I replied my wife and I truly had no spare clothes we could bring in. I was chastised by two reporters for not trying, for not thinking of others, etc...
@nytimes 7...they never asked WHY I didn't have any clothes to spare. The reason was simple:

I had conceived of and put together the entire project. I pitched it to the publisher, but asked him never to reveal it was my idea - I thought people would be more likely to do it if they....
@nytimes 8...though the program was his, not mine. He appointed a woman in the employee relations program to help me.

We ran multiple tests to see if the whole thing worked, because - again - it was complicated. We needed clothes for these tests. The clothes we used were mine....
@nytimes 9...so the reason we had none to give is because we had already given them all away to the very program that the other reporter/s were lecturing me about. I stayed silent - although I would have explained if someone had asked - because I did not want it to be undermined as...
@nytimes 10...not being a program from the publisher.

Sometime after I was balled out by other reporters for not giving, the employee relations person and I received this letter from the publisher. He gave us both a secret $500 publishers award for working so hard on this..
@nytimes 11...now, publisher awards are always publicly announced, with the recipients on posters in the newsroom. Not this time - secrecy, we knew was important.

So, the lesson for journalism: With ONE additional fact, I went from selfish to not. I went from not caring to caring a lot..
@nytimes 12...and this is what is wrong with journalism. There is ALWAYS one fact. Sometimes, even the formation of the question shows the journalist has not thought through the story. Except for daily stories where reaction was to an event, I NEVER asked an interview subject....
@nytimes 13.."how do you respond to this allegation against you from someone else" because I am automatically adopting that allegation as the perspective of the story. I always asked tons of general question, then more specific, to gather multiple sides of a story and then pick through..
@nytimes 14...the facts to figure out what is the most accurate and fair representation of the story.

I have had a lot written about me over the years. Easily 90% of it has been wrong. Easily 95% of the time, it was written without the reporter contacting me. And every time....
@nytimes 15...reporters presented it as truth. When I give speeches, I often ask "how many of you have read or seen a story that you have personal knowledge about the underlying facts." Bunches of hands go up. Then I ask, "How many think the story was wrong?" And most of the hands stay...
@nytimes 16...up. This is usually NOT about bias. It is about laziness. It is why, in the buildup to the election, "her emails her emails her emails" were endless stories - even though the "rule" cited went unread by people writing. I know this because the rule authorized what she did....
@nytimes 17...this would have been fine except, everyone also agreed that Trump had no chance of winning, and so - based on that unreported agreement - everyone pretty much ignored him except the Washington Post and Newsweek.

So, the lesson from my simple tale to reporters: When you...
@nytimes 18...dont ask questions, when you don't start from a perspective of "any side could be telling the truth, or all of them could be wrong", when you dont think "what possible errors am i making" you will make errors.

Every single time.
@nytimes 19...and if the reporters who bawled me out remember this and see this - dont worry about it. I was more amused than mad.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Eichenwald

Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kurteichenwald

Sep 24, 2023
Unsurprisingly, @RealPNavarro has no idea what the Mayo Clinic actually said. And the idea that doctors in ICUs are going to make medical decisions with critically ill pts based on CNN reports is crazy. But what do studies actually say, and why is hydro use so limited? Well...
Image
..In 2020, FDA (under Trump), NIH and World Health Organization stopped studies evaluating hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 due to a lack of benefit. Current NIH and US guidelines recommend its use for COVID-19 treatment in hospitals only in clinical trials...
...in *Britain*, the largest study on hydro (the RECOVERY Trial" - one of few randomized & controlled - evaluated potential treatments for patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Investigators found no benefit or reduction of death in hospitalized patients receiving hydro...
Read 6 tweets
Sep 15, 2023
Media who interview CEO Barra of @GM need to understand: When asked about difference between how much of an increase she receives to reach her compensation ($30 mill - higher than all but Tesla) compared to workers, she says "It's performance based." What a croc. Here's why.../1
...For most, it's hard for average person to understand because the compensation standards in GM's proxy is loaded with undefined acronyms - TSR, LTIP, NEO, etc. But when you know the meaning, you see that her compensation is rigged. A good percentage of her comp is based on...
...comparisons to the performance of other companies & comps with other company CEO's comp. Well, for the first one, they use other auto makers, most of which are nowhere close to the size/diversity of GM (Renault, Stelantis, Suzuki) so they really aren't comparable. BUT when...
Read 15 tweets
Aug 15, 2023
Would reporters *please* stop saying RICO law in Georgia is intended to be applied to organized crime. That is *false.* In fact, it is wrong on so many levels that it is shocking reporters keep saying it. They are clearly referring to federal RICO - where they are also wrong.../1
...federal RICO (not part of the Georgia case) has been and - according G. Robert Blakey, the man who wrote the statute - was intended both to apply to the activities of organized crime *and* other criminal enterprises, including white collar crime. From Blakey in 1989:.../2 Image
...the reason Blakey is discussing white collar crime is because, at that time, RICO was being used to bludgeon Wall Street fraud. But the federal law was specifically written to address a pattern of criminal activity that involved an "enterprise" such as a corrupt company.../3
Read 12 tweets
Jul 24, 2023
Florida wants to teach about "skills" slaves obtained in the antebellum south because "beneficent" slaveholders taught their slaves to read, write, blacksmithing, etc. They say this is supported by "scholars." Well, let's see what the scholars really say.../1
...first, let's start with blacksmithing, since this is specifically what DeSantis mentioned yesterday. This, more than anything, underscores the brutal ignorance of the GOP on history, and their apparent belief that Africans arrived here as ignorant, incompetent savages.../2
...reality: People who were already skilled blacksmiths were brought in chains from West Africa. These Africans were among the most skilled blacksmiths the world had ever seen, and *they* taught *white* blacksmiths new skills and techniques. African blacksmith slaves were.../3
Read 15 tweets
Jul 20, 2023
Wow. This is the biggest pile of nonsense I have ever read. A few problems:
1. Viktor Shokin never conducted a criminal investigation of Burisma. There was a criminal investigation in *Britain* of Mykola Zlochevsky, founder of Burisma, for purportedly laundering money stolen.../1
...when Zlochevsky served as Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources in Ukraine through British banks. Britain attempted to get documents for its case from Ukraine and Shokin *blocked* it.

2. Shokin also blocked all investigations of Ukranian oligarchs, which is what led.../2
...the EU, overseas investment firms and ultimately the IMF to either pull out investment/loans or threaten to unless Shokin was fired.

3. Shokin finally left when his deputy publicly resigned, announcing on national TV the details of Shokin's corruption re: oligarchs.../3
Read 12 tweets
Jun 10, 2023
I've long said, despite the criminality depicted in Bragg's statement of facts, the linkage to tax fraud was weak and the most damning part - the AIM coordination - was a federal crime, so not charged. IOW, I wouldnt be surprised if it didn't survive a motion to dismiss. But.../1
...the classified documents case is in another stratosphere. The magnitude of the crimes depicted are deeply serious and per se illegal. There is no "linkage" required. Plus, the witnesses are all from Trump world...unlike Michael Cohen, it would nearly impossible to argue.../2
...these are people who despise Trump. They are his guys, deeply supportive of him. Add to that the devastating tape (which likely contains even more than depicted in the indictment) and the testimony of is own PAC guy, and the violations of disseminating classified info are../3
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(