Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture
May 21, 2019 25 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1. From Mueller's start, I said thered be no proof of collusion by Trump. My case: He's too stupid to orchestrate something so complex, too trained in corruption to speak in anything but code, & too surrounded by cons to be misheard.

It doesn't matter. Trump sold out America...
2...the key is and always has been Trump Tower Moscow and how it allowed Putin to compromise Trump. Again, from the beginning, I have said that was what Trump's obstruction was trying to hide. And make no mistake - no matter how many times they say "no obstruction"....
3...Mueller - and our own eyes - established that there was.

This requires a step-by-step analysis.

It starts in 2008, when Trump Organization trademarked the Trump name in Russia. (BTW, before you criticize me for not writing this earlier, I reported all this pre-election)...
4. That year, Trump launched negotiations with a the Mos City Group. But no deal was reached because Trump was trying to grab cash with both hands. He wanted 25% of the projects total cost as a payment for him letting Mos slap his name on the building. But from those talks....
5...Trump maintained close relations with Pavel Fuks, head of the Mos City Group and one of the most politically prominent oligarchs in Russia, with significant interests in real estate and the country’s financial industry, including the Pushkino bank and Sovcombank.....
6...fast forward in time. 2013, Trump is back in Moscow for his beauty pageant, meeting with oligarchs while there to discuss financial dealings. Then...when he announced his bid for president in 2015, the Trump Org was back in talks about Trump Tower Moscow. Those talks....
7...directly involved business allies of Putin and government toadies. No one could be stupid enough, even Trump, to believe the Kremlin did not know what was going on.

On August 3, 2016, Trump receives his first intelligence briefing. He is told, flat out, that Russia is...
8...engaged in a cyberwar against America to influence the outcome of the election. Look what happened immediately after that briefing - Trump went absolutely nuts. So much so that he began to scare the Kremlin.

Here is what I reported pre-election on that:
9...btw, I was attacked mercilessly for my reporting on Wikileaks being a front for Russia in delivering material. Told ya so.

Now, big problem for Trump: He lied and lied about Trump Tower Moscow. He knew he was in talks, he knew Putin knew, he knew Putin knew he knew....
10...in other words, Trump - preelection - was absolutely compromised by Putin. There were just a handful of people who knew Trump was lying about Trump Tower Moscow - Michael Cohen, his kids, a select few at Trump Org, Trump, Putin, and Putin's allies. Trump began attacking....
11...our intel agencies in September - weeks after he learned of the Kremlin's cyberattacks. He stood on stages and blamed the Chinese, some fat guy in a basement, some teenager - ANYBODY but who the intel agencies told him was responsible. Now, think about this for a second....
12...This is have said from the get-go. THAT was the collusion. It took place in plain sight. All of our allies knew about the intel, because we share info with them and they had developed their own, plus THEY were under Russian attack. They knew we knew, they knew Trump knew...
13...and they knew Trump was standing on a stage making ridiculous statements about anybody other than Russia was responsible. This freaked out our allies, as I described in great detail in this article it came out just before election.) newsweek.com/donald-trump-v… ....
14...this piece also got me roundly attacked. Almost all of it is now known to be true, the remaining part not yet publicly confirmed is true.

Here some key parts about our allies reacting to Trump's statements on our intel, starting with quotes that horrified allies....
15...now, the part I was missing, and the part that probably folks in the intel agencies knew: When Trump was saying he had no financial interests in Russia, when he said there was no Trump Tower Moscow deal, HE WAS LYING. Attacking Russia left him exposed to losing millions....
16...and once he started lying, there was no stopping.

On to Michael Cohen. Now, Trump Tower Moscow was the key evidence that Trump was compromised - not necessarily through some clever Russian operation, but from his decision to lie and attack our intel agencies based....
17...on his financial interests. He came in defense of Putin because Putin knew the truth. And he just made it worse and worse. (This, I am sure, is why Helsinki was such a treasonous disaster.)

Cohen had been to Moscow on these negotiations. He knew first hand Trump lied.....
18...and when he was called before Congress, he lied about it. Under oath.

Now, Cohen says Trump knew he was going to lie and that Sekulow was in on it. I have no idea. But what I DO know from knowing Trump for decades is this...there's ZERO chance he did not know what Cohen...
19...testified to. There is ZERO chance that his lawyers were paying no attention. There is ZERO chance that they failed to tell him.

Trump, as president, had an absolute obligation to disclose that his lawyer had committed perjury. He did not. He stood by and allowed him to...
20...deceive Congress. He allowed him to lie to Congress by repeating the lies HE had told. Now all of you have seen Trump in action - what is the chance that he would admit to a lie? Never ever ever ever happens.

So now, Putin knew Trump lied, Cohen perjured, and Trump did....
21..nothing to cure the perjury. Our president was completely compromised by Russia. Eventually, Cohen has testified that Trump knew about the perjury ahead of time. Trump's actions - or failure to act - in the aftermath of the perjury is strong circumstantial evidence that....
22...Cohen is telling the truth. But it doesn't matter. Trump knew afterwards, and did nothing to fix it. This is a continued part of the coverup.

Direct collusion would be terrible, but it was never probable. But all of this has taken place in front of our eyes. We know it...
23...is all true. So when people say "can't be obstruction without a crime" - BS. There WAS a crime, committed by Cohen. There was a series of repeated lies, by Trump. And there is the almost irrefutable evidence that the President of the United States is compromised by Russia...
24...and trying to keep any of that secret from prosecutors is obstruction. THIS is why he is blocking everyone from testifying. If anyone testifies, everyone can. He needs it to stop. So Congress must dig into Trump Tower Moscow. We cant have a president compromised by an enemy.
People are misreading what I am saying. By "proof of collusion" I mean evidence of direct contact between Trump and Russian officials involved in the effort, or direct contact by someone else on Trump's order.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Eichenwald

Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kurteichenwald

Oct 26
As someone who has been a journalist for almost 40 year, working as a senior writer at the New York Times, Newsweek, etc, the decision by @WilliamLewis, a Murdoch alum, to cripple the @washingtonpost by abandoning endorsements, is one of the most craven actions I've ever seen../1
...taken in the industry. Make no mistake, this wasn't just cowardice. It was @WilliamLewis and perhaps @JeffBezos dragging a now-once great paper into the sewer because of their own political beliefs. If Lewis et al wanted to abandon endorsements, fine. But you don't do it.../2
@WilliamLewis @JeffBezos ...days one of the most consequential elections in history. We have on one side a convicted felon, deemed an ignorant fascist by his own people, who half this country believes is, in fact, a fascist, and on the other side a woman half the country believes is a communist.../3
Read 14 tweets
Sep 16
Make no mistake: The "Haitians are stealing your pets to eat them" lie is a variant of the blood libel that Jews have faced for centuries: In that, Jews are stealing Christian babies to use their blood bake food (Matzah).

Trump and Vance are lying about legal residents..../1
....accusing them of stealing beloved members of the family, and eating them. The point of the Haitian Blood Libel is the same as the original Blood Libel: To create an "other," to unify the hateful and ignorance against an imaginary enemy in their midst, all to seize power.../2
...so please, stop calling the attack on lawful American residents from Haiti as a "lie." Call it was it is: The #HaitianBloodLibel generated by Trump and Vance. A century ago they would have used Jews. And Fox News would have been the May 1934 volume of Der Stürmer.../3
Read 4 tweets
Aug 26
The appeal filed by Jack Smith on Judge Cannon's dismissal of the classified documents cased underscores an embarrassment that should not exist in modern times, things that were evident in her ruling. Cannon is clearly either stupid or corrupt..../1
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
...there are SO many elements to her nonsense in her ruling that have been just jaw dropping (ruling that past participles are the same as past tense, and on and on) but Smith thankfully points out the two that most annoyed me: She described what was the central finding in.../2
...US v Nixon as nothing more than "unpersuasive dicta." In fact, it was the foundation of the SCOTUS ruling and had been fully briefed by both sides. Second, she used the TITLE of a statute to overrule what the statute said, even though it includes an explicit statement.../3
Read 6 tweets
Aug 25
I have been holding my tongue for a long time, but I am SICK of self-identified evangelicals saying they read things in the Bible that 1. Aren't there or 2. Are being massively misrepresented and 3. DO happen to be garbage appearing on Facebook posts. I am writing this only.../1
...because these are the same kinds of people who misquote or cherry pick the Bible to justify their hatreds and self-worship. Worse, they say it with such self-confidence that other evangelicals (who are constantly found in polls to be the most Biblically illiterate, worse..../2
...than atheists. Mormon's know it best, even though their scripture if the Book of Mormon.) Anyway, here is the latest on the Holiness of Trump "based" on the Bible. It comes from Lee Greenwood and Ted Nugent's wife who says she "read" her claims in the Bible. (She didn't)..
Read 16 tweets
Aug 9
Trump's lies sometimes involve a series of events from his past blended together into one where he is the center of the universe. His lie about going down in a helicopter with Willy Brown:
1. Three of his executives went down in a helicopter in 1988 and died. (Trump lied that...1
...he was supposed to be on that flight but backed out at the last second.)
2. He met with Willie Brown in the 1980s.
3. He flew in a helicopter with Jerry Brown (and Gavin Newsom) during his presidency, during which he fretted that the helicoptercopter would go down.

While..2
...like I said, he often blends stories into one where he is at the center of an adventure or he is the hero of the tale, this one is so bizarre that I suspect we are watching an increasing dementia, which is in the family. Someone with a habit of blending memories...3
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
That SCOTUS overruling ANOTHER precedent - this one that established the Chevron doctrine, which has been cited in literally thousands of federal cases - was signaled by the court in 2022. Then I said the ruling in West Virginia v. EPA was the most important in decades.../1
...because it showed that the conservatives were gearing up to take regulatory administration out of the hands of experts and place it in the hands of the political hacks that now occupy our courts . It is an obscene power grab by this court, which has already ripped away.../2
...the authority of Congress, state legislatures, state courts etc. whenever it wants to drive policy. No precedent is safe. Stare decisis is over. This is an activist court unlike any in our country's history.

Mark Lemley broke down the court's imperial power grabs, and how..3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(