, 11 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
1/8 #Nadler: "DOJ policy POTUS can't be indicted NOW is WRONG." Hamilton directly refutes in Federalist 69: Senate CONVICTION on impeachment and REMOVAL from Office PREREQUISITES to any other charges. see 2/8 #MAGA #KAG
#Hamilton on INDICTING @POTUS: "President would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, UPON CONVICTION of treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors, REMOVED from office; and would AFTERWARDS be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law." 2/8
So what is alleged "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors?" #MuellerReport REFUTES Collusion. Obstruction boils down to President Trump asserting LAWFUL DEFENSES to bogus obstruction charge, protected by 1st, 4th, 5th & 6th Amendments. + No "there" there. #KAG
1st Amendment: Barring a lawful gag order (there was none), 45 has 1st A right to call witch hunt a witch hunt - especially because it turned out to be TRUE - based on NO COLLUSION finding. How can TELLING the TRUTH be "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors?"
4th Am bars "unreasonable" searches/seizures of candidate/Prez Trump. Evidence shows FISA warrants infirm. Fruit of Poisonous Tree doctrine bars USE of any collected incriminating evidence - yet NO evidence found! Where is "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors?"
5th Am: targets don't have to self-incriminate. Well-known FBI interview TRICK: if target gives truthful answer, get someone to disagree & CHARGE TARGET w/ lying to SC. Mueller USED trick repeatedly. So NO interview is NOT "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors."
6th Amendment: Target has right to COUNSEL (a lawyer), who told POTUS: "Don't fall for that old interview TRICK/TRAP. Give written answers." How is relying on GOOD ADVICE of COUNSEL "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors?"
Impeachment conviction requires 2/3 Senate = 67. So far not even a prima facie (bare minimum) HOUSE case for "treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors." In fact, ALL evidence points the OTHER way. Where are the stateswo/men in Senate DEMANDING end to charade?" 8/8
Unroll @threadreaderapp thanks
@parscale Arguing SC had discretion 2 charge POTUS notwithstanding DOJ opn (& Constitution) fails. Better: If Mueller knew NO COLLUSION from get-go (as many have said), his Dem team's DELAY intended (1) to induce process crime (obstruction) by POTUS under midterm duress & /cont
(2) to swing House/Sen midterms to their party/faction (Dems), which proves Mueller's teams' nondisclosure itself OBSTRUCTED justice. Insurance Policy intended also to empower treasonous faction in House. Unprivileged #AbuseOfProcess Yet ANOTHER Constitutional violation. #KAG
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to FederalistWatch
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!