@spolsky@bgurley@patrick_oshag 4/ This one on Evolution & Revolution as Organizations Grow shared by a @CBinsights newsletter subscriber is great in framing the challenges of scaling
"When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact."
My favorite concept from @AnnieDuke's Thinking in Bets was that of "resulting" - our tendency to equate the quality of a decision with the quality of its outcome
16/ “the better the startup is doing, the more chaos there is...is one of the few startup problems that growth doesn’t solve - in fact, it’s caused by growth.”
Fantastic practical & actionable essay on scaling from 50 to 500 by @DavidSacks
So it's public peers are 4x to 5x larger in terms terms of revenue
And they're growing 2.5x to 4.5x faster
Add in a further discount for illiquidity given Airtable is private, the valuation is prob south of $991 million
Asana has the lowest price/revenue multiple of the bunch at 6.61x which is how we arrive at the $991M
Asana is also growing at almost 3x the rate of Airtable off revenue that is 4x larger
It's not hard to imagine that this brings down the multiple of Airtable to 3 to 5x which would equate to a valation of
$450M to $750M
That'd be a discount of 93-96% vs that Dec 2021 valuation
The company is cutting costs and repositioning for profitability which makes sense in this market but given the current likely valuation, all investors after the March 2018 Series B are likely underwater
They're also talking about a future IPO but getting back to anywhere close to that $11.7B valuation would require reigniting massive growth and making that price:revenue to growth ratio look more appealing
As always, if you believe any of my assumptions in the above are incorrect, please comment and I'll update the analysis if the additional context dramatically changes the results
If you want to go deep on the space, we analyzed @airtable & peers as well as products in the space in Jan 2023
The numbers have evolved a bit but the storyline remains the same.
The massive Airtable equity funding tally was something that caught our eye then as well
If you're a fan of math, you might also like this analysis of Flexport's valuation
Bragging about headcount was 1 of the most corrosive trends in startup land over the last many years
I was guilty of it too
Somehow larger growing headcount became a positive signal of success for companies
When in reality, it may more often than not be a negative signal
If you look at articles about unicorns, you'd rarely see revenue figures but you'd see founders/CEOs bragging about taking the team to 800 by year-end
Fundraising and headcount became 2 false proxies for success
But what are the real negatives of more headcount?
It may be symptomatic of or lead to ("may" is important here)
- indicate lack of focus
- belief that scale comes from ppl not systems
- a lack of focus on culture
- a non-performance driven culture
- execs motivated by empire-building
- excess complexity & slower velocity