yes, I am at @FASEBorg. yes, my talk is mostly about maternal & neonatal effects of NR. yes, @gatesfoundation and other agencies are supporting direct comparisons of NR, NMN, NAM and other compounds in our lab. yes, we are showing clinical data on largest NR study to date: /1
3 doses of NR against placebo and I've already been quoted that we are happy with the results, especially showing no dysregulation of 1-carbon metabolism and terrific dose-dependent increases in NAD+. yes, the study is in press @SciReports. no we don't have pub date. /2
no, the mtg is not frosty. there's a huge amount of work on #nicotinamideriboside at the mtg and everyone is showing me a lot of ❤️. thanks for your interest, now back to the posters🤓 /end
We are comparing NAD boosters in mice and in rats with multiple extremely sensitive measures
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
today @davidasinclair is telling the world that he has achieved age reversal with chemical cocktails
he submitted the paper on June 30 & it was accepted on July 4 by a journal of which he is coeditor-in-chief
paper was sent to me 3 days ago by a reporter for comment
reporter was told it is a "groundbreaking study" & "the first chemical approach to reprogram cells to a younger state"
reason WSJ didn't cover that paper is that ppl have been reporting chemical compounds that drive conversion of cells to induced pluripotency for the last 10-15 years
all of the compounds in today's paper were previously reported by others, mostly in 2013
there's a peer review failure today doi.org/10.1016/j.cell… in which an individual with 59 collaborators claims to have tested the information theory of aging
he did not test the information theory of aging
the claim is that he induced dsDNA breaks that are easily repaired, don't cause a DNA damage response or mutagenesis or cell death--only an epigenetic change
he knows this is not true because his co-first author & he published this paper in dec '21
there are a few issues being addressed here. let’s start w safety
human placebo controlled trials have never shown adverse events attributable to Niagen. note that LDL-C is raised in humans w Basis & pterostilbene alone
the class of compounds to which NR belongs is vitamin B3
there are decades of human data on these molecules showing human safety. niacin is unique in causing flushing but nicotinamide was tested in large Australian skin cancer and was shown to be cancer-preventative in ppl
there’s a hierarchy of evidence w human RCTs (and meta-analysis of RCTs) on the top. human case reports & good quality rodent studies are lower. cell studies are lower. poorly conducted rodent and/or poorly conducted cell studies are garbage in/garbage out