David_Propst_PA-C Profile picture
Jul 2, 2019 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
This post by @tednaiman led to some questions about protein safety that were kindly answered by @mackinprof. High protein diets are often promoted for weight loss, muscle hypertrophy, and prevention of sarcopenia. What are the safety questions and what does the research show?
Concern #1. Protein is bad for the kidneys.
No. The basic thought was that since the kidneys “process” the protein, if you eat more, they work harder, so high protein diets are hard on the kidneys. That is not what the evidence shows.
Zhu et al., 2018 showed no benefit in diabetics with kidney disease (unhealthy patients) when put on a low protein diet.

lipidworld.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
Longland et al., 2016 also showed that a higher protein diet actually improved kidney function measures (GFR in healthy patients, unclear if a benefit but certainly did not worsen function).

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817506
One noted nephrologist at a conference had us repeat “there is no such thing as a renal diet!”
Concern #2. Protein is bad for the bones.
No. Shams-White et al., 2017 reviewed several studies and found high protein intakes did not have any negative effects on bone health and there was actually a trend towards improved bone health.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404575
Concern #3. Increased protein is bad for the liver and cholesterol.
No. Antonio et al., 2016 showed high protein diet for a year had no negative impact on liver functions or cholesterol.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26778925
(Just FYI, only a few days of a bad diet can change liver functions and cholesterol, so 4 months is a good length of time to study this).
Concern #4. You only need so much protein and the rest (up to 50-60%) is turned to sugar.
No. Multiple studies have shown no increase in blood glucose after protein intake.
Yes, the body can make glucose from protein but even after as 12 hour fast (body needs glucose) when fed 23g protein only around 4g sugar is made (Fromentin et al., 2013). A teaspoon of sugar is 5g.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
So what is the primary care perspective? Protein can assist in weight loss, muscle gain, and prevention of muscle loss. In a world of obesity and sarcopenia, a higher intake of protein may be quite beneficial and appears quite safe but nothing is taken for granted.
Tweets not medical advice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David_Propst_PA-C

David_Propst_PA-C Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PrimaryCarePAC

Feb 6
Creatine has > 700 peer-reviewed studies behind it.
Tested for safety for > 30 years.
But most people still think it destroys your kidneys because of a single case report from 1998 involving a patient who already had kidney disease.
Here’s what the actual evidence says 🧵 Image
The International Society of Sports Nutrition calls creatine monohydrate the single most effective legal supplement for increasing high-intensity exercise capacity and lean body mass.
That’s not my opinion. That’s the consensus position statement, updated in 2017 and reaffirmed since.
But the gym benefits are honestly the least interesting part now.
Read 18 tweets
May 9, 2025
Muscle power, not strength, predicted who lived and who died.

A 22-year cohort (3,889 adults) showed 5–7x mortality risk for those with low relative power.

Strength didn’t even reach statistical significance.

🧵 Here's the breakdown: Image
Study: Araújo et al., Mayo Clin Proc 2025
rPOW: HR = 5.88 (men), 6.90 (women)

rSTR: Not significant

Power improved C-index, NRI, IDI

Kaplan-Meier curves: steeper drop in survival for low power Image
We’ve relied too long on grip strength alone.

Power is more functional.

- Sit-to-stand
- Stair climb
- Speed of movement

These matter more in real life and predict risk better.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 10, 2025
Many people still think creatine is risky.

A new study just reviewed: • 685 clinical trials
• 28.4 million adverse event reports
• 129,000+ social media posts

And found…
Creatine is as safe as placebo.

Here’s the breakdown: Image
Side effects in clinical trials:
• 13.7% of creatine studies
• 13.2% of placebo studies

At the participant level:
• 4.60% (creatine)
• 4.21% (placebo)

→ No statistical difference
What about GI issues and cramping?

Yes, they were slightly more common in creatine groups—

…but only in one long-term Parkinson’s study using 10g/day for 8 y

For normal (routine dosing) users: risk is minimal to nonexistent.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 6, 2025
Muscle mass used to be central to aging research. Then it wasn’t. But another study using D3-creatine shows: the link between mass and function was always there—we just weren’t measuring it right. A thread: Image
Sarcopenia was defined as loss of muscle mass—not strength. But studies using DXA and BIA showed weak associations. So strength took over.
The problem? DXA & BIA over- or under-estimate muscle. They can’t distinguish real muscle from water, fat, or connective tissue.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 4, 2025
🚨 Can protein intake prevent muscle loss during immobilization? Two new studies suggest it might not be enough. A thread 🧵👇

Study 1: 33 young men immobilized for 3 days. They ate either:
High protein (1.6g/kg/day)
Low protein (0.5g/kg/day)
Almost no protein (0.15g/kg/day)

Results? All groups lost 2-3% muscle volume and muscle protein synthesis (MyoPS) dropped 26-30%—no difference between diets. 😨

Study 2: 12 adults immobilized for 14 days.
Researchers infused them with either low or high-dose amino acids to see if it could counter muscle loss.

Muscle size dropped ~5%, strength dropped ~25%, and MyoPS fell 27% in the immobilized leg. Even with extra amino acids, muscle remained anabolically resistant.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 25, 2025
🚨 Why Checking B12 Alone Isn’t Enough 🚨

A normal B12 test result doesn't always mean you're in the clear! Total serum B12 doesn't reflect active levels—functional tests like MMA & homocysteine are key. Learn why comprehensive testing matters: Full article on Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/propstmetabolichealth/p/why-checking-b12-alone-isnt-enough?r=59rzqc&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Many people with B12 deficiency are misdiagnosed because they only get a serum B12 test—which can miss real deficiencies. Let's break it down 👇
A "normal" B12 result doesn't mean your cells are getting enough active B12. Some forms of B12 are inactive, and inflammation can give false readings.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(