This post by @tednaiman led to some questions about protein safety that were kindly answered by @mackinprof. High protein diets are often promoted for weight loss, muscle hypertrophy, and prevention of sarcopenia. What are the safety questions and what does the research show?
Concern #1. Protein is bad for the kidneys.
No. The basic thought was that since the kidneys “process” the protein, if you eat more, they work harder, so high protein diets are hard on the kidneys. That is not what the evidence shows.
Zhu et al., 2018 showed no benefit in diabetics with kidney disease (unhealthy patients) when put on a low protein diet.
Longland et al., 2016 also showed that a higher protein diet actually improved kidney function measures (GFR in healthy patients, unclear if a benefit but certainly did not worsen function).
One noted nephrologist at a conference had us repeat “there is no such thing as a renal diet!”
Concern #2. Protein is bad for the bones.
No. Shams-White et al., 2017 reviewed several studies and found high protein intakes did not have any negative effects on bone health and there was actually a trend towards improved bone health.
Concern #3. Increased protein is bad for the liver and cholesterol.
No. Antonio et al., 2016 showed high protein diet for a year had no negative impact on liver functions or cholesterol.
(Just FYI, only a few days of a bad diet can change liver functions and cholesterol, so 4 months is a good length of time to study this).
Concern #4. You only need so much protein and the rest (up to 50-60%) is turned to sugar.
No. Multiple studies have shown no increase in blood glucose after protein intake.
Yes, the body can make glucose from protein but even after as 12 hour fast (body needs glucose) when fed 23g protein only around 4g sugar is made (Fromentin et al., 2013). A teaspoon of sugar is 5g.
So what is the primary care perspective? Protein can assist in weight loss, muscle gain, and prevention of muscle loss. In a world of obesity and sarcopenia, a higher intake of protein may be quite beneficial and appears quite safe but nothing is taken for granted.
Muscle mass used to be central to aging research. Then it wasn’t. But another study using D3-creatine shows: the link between mass and function was always there—we just weren’t measuring it right. A thread:
Sarcopenia was defined as loss of muscle mass—not strength. But studies using DXA and BIA showed weak associations. So strength took over.
The problem? DXA & BIA over- or under-estimate muscle. They can’t distinguish real muscle from water, fat, or connective tissue.
🚨 Can protein intake prevent muscle loss during immobilization? Two new studies suggest it might not be enough. A thread 🧵👇
Study 1: 33 young men immobilized for 3 days. They ate either:
High protein (1.6g/kg/day)
Low protein (0.5g/kg/day)
Almost no protein (0.15g/kg/day)
Results? All groups lost 2-3% muscle volume and muscle protein synthesis (MyoPS) dropped 26-30%—no difference between diets. 😨
Study 2: 12 adults immobilized for 14 days.
Researchers infused them with either low or high-dose amino acids to see if it could counter muscle loss.
Muscle size dropped ~5%, strength dropped ~25%, and MyoPS fell 27% in the immobilized leg. Even with extra amino acids, muscle remained anabolically resistant.
A normal B12 test result doesn't always mean you're in the clear! Total serum B12 doesn't reflect active levels—functional tests like MMA & homocysteine are key. Learn why comprehensive testing matters:
Many people with B12 deficiency are misdiagnosed because they only get a serum B12 test—which can miss real deficiencies. Let's break it down 👇
A "normal" B12 result doesn't mean your cells are getting enough active B12. Some forms of B12 are inactive, and inflammation can give false readings.
Losing muscle with age isn't inevitable. Sarcopenia, or age-related muscle loss, can be slowed—even reversed—with resistance training. Here’s how exercise impacts muscle stem cells (satellite cells) and keeps you strong. 🏋️♂️👇
Sarcopenia leads to a decline in type II muscle fibers, which are crucial for strength & power. Research shows that satellite cells—responsible for muscle repair—also decline with age, reducing muscle regeneration.
The good news? Resistance training can increase satellite cell activation by up to 76%, reversing some effects of aging. This helps rebuild lost muscle and maintain function, even in your 60s, 70s, and beyond.