, 24 tweets, 9 min read Read on Twitter
(1) A short #QAnon thread on "SPACE".
(2) AGAIN: There's absolutely nothing absurd or sensationalist about saying that there are 7 (or 8) UFOs in this photo that POTUS just tweeted. Let me take you by the hand: a) they are Unidentified, b) they are flying, c) they are objects.

U F O s
(3) Let's get rid of this nonsense. This meme wants to say that reflection is mirrored both in the width axis AND the depth axis.

B U L L S H I T.
(4) Also: Lens flares have "halos" and have a common perspective emanating from the source of light, are not all hard dots of equal size.
(5) Look for yourself.
(6) You want to talk about the Secret Space Project?

Q post 41. Shocking how no one suspected the US for that.
(7) Us in #TheStorm know about the "Rods Of God", the space kinetic projectiles.
(8) Imagine a telephone poll made of tungsten falling from the sky at supersonic speed.

It's a small tactical nuclear bomb, without radiation fallout.

About 17 MOABs in one.
(9) Drop 209, November 2017: the relation between BHO killing the space project, and the rise of SpaceX.
(10) December 23rd, 2017. More on the connection: the termination of the shuttle program is designed to have US lose dominance in space. And implies NASA tech is going to SpaceX.
(11) Space is CRITICAL for US security.
(12) See this excerpt from drop 570 January 21st, 2018:

[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]

Lose space dominance allows enemies to take out military satellites, install WMDs and attack with EMPs from the space, while America watches helpless.
(13) And don't even imagine the war on the stars is not already ongoing.

Exhibit 1: the Chinese Heavenly Palace.
(14) Also: Q talks straight to us.

(16) POTUS will be the one to disclose.
(17) Dark to LIGHT.
(18) The man with 20-20 vision.
(20) Support my work in patreon.com/paulserran
(21) Or use the DONATE button on my blog ALL THINGS Q



Let's see what POTUS says on TUCKER today.
(25) one last word on the "lens flare" insistents:

the symetry isn't right, the number of lamps-to-dots is all wrong, the positions of the lamps-to-dots are all wrong.

thanks @GalhardiJulio for the explanation.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Paul Serran
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!