steven t. piantadosi Profile picture
Jul 9, 2019 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Gather round, everyone--with Epstein's arrest, we all get to take @LKrauss1's master class on misusing "scientific thinking" to cover up exploitation of women. #MeTooSTEM (Thread)
nytimes.com/2019/07/08/nyr…
Scientific thinking is when you look at all the available evidence, including court rulings, testimony, and base rates (about 5% of sexual assault reports are false), and recognize the limitations of your own perceptions.
But @LKrauss1 and others used a "scientific" worldview in exactly the wrong way--not to find the truth, but to elevate a friend and funder who had already pled guilty to sex crimes (halting a deeper investigation)
thedailybeast.com/katie-couric-w…
freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/201… Image
Are we supposed to believe that Krauss only believes in things he has directly seen? That empirical evidence doesn't include what witnesses say? That Krauss doesn't understand his own conflict of interest in assessing Epstein?
"As a scientist," Krauss is skeptical of everything except his own social acumen.
Krauss took some criticism for it at the time--echoes of #MeTooSTEM in 2011
skepchick.org/2011/04/lawren…
Emailing with @rebeccawatson, he doubled down: "Based on my direct experience with [Epstein], which is all I can base my assessment on [WHY???!], he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man ... I honestly don’t know who was the victim in this case. probably everyone was a victim"
When the FBI raided Epstein's mansion in 2019, they found a "trove" of pictures of nude photographs of young girls and other evidence, and charged Epstein with sex trafficking, creating "a vast network of underage victims"
nymag.com/intelligencer/…
“'Epstein had sex with underage girls on a daily basis' and that his interest in minor girls was 'obvious' to those in his orbit. His code word for this abuse was 'massage,'”
thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstei…
"jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex… I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage" - professional skeptic @LKrauss1 in 2011
Biologist @TriversRobert, also funded by Epstein, was quoted by @Reuters in 2011: “By the time they're 14 or 15, they’re like grown women were 60 years ago, so I don’t see these acts as so heinous” (he has since apologized)
reuters.com/article/us-eps…
Parroting skepticism and reason appears measured, but it often is entirely selfish.
In 2018, @LKrauss1 was found to have violated @ASU's policies on sexual harassment by groping a woman.
statepress.com/article/2018/0…
There was a call to cover up for Krauss too, in part by posting a bunch of terrible arguments patheos.com/blogs/dispatch…
(I tweeted about it too Krauss responded with a tired Christopher Hitchens quote, but if he thought that quote was a convincing argument, he should have deployed it to stop @ASU from finding him guilty)
So @LKrauss1 is "scientific" in the same way flat earthers are, using skeptical posturing to sow doubt about the truth when it serves his interests.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with steven t. piantadosi

steven t. piantadosi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @spiantado

Feb 7
It is an amazing time to work in the cognitive science of language. Here are a few remarkable recent results, many of which highlight ways in which the critiques of LLMs (especially from generative linguistics!) have totally fallen to pieces.
One claim was that LLMs can't be right because they learn "impossible languages." This was never really justified, and now @JulieKallini and collaborators show its probably not true:
One claim was that they LLMs can't be on the right track because they "require" large data sets. Progress has been remarkable on learning with developmentally-plausible data sets. Amazing comparisons spearheaded by @a_stadt and colleagues:
Read 13 tweets
Jan 31, 2023
Really great job here, @GlassHealthHQ. Your technology is ready for clinical use. ImageImage
@GlassHealthHQ sounds like sleep apnea, says @GlassHealthHQ Image
Read 13 tweets
Dec 4, 2022
Yes, ChatGPT is amazing and impressive. No, @OpenAI has not come close to addressing the problem of bias. Filters appear to be bypassed with simple tricks, and superficially masked.

And what is lurking inside is egregious.

@Abebab @sama
tw racism, sexism. Image
It's not a fluke
Read 9 tweets
Dec 3, 2022
still just unbelievable
Read 7 tweets
Aug 26, 2022
Yeah, yeah, quantum mechanics and relativity are counterintuitive because we didn’t evolve to deal with stuff on those scales.

But more ordinary things like numbers, geometry, and procedures are also baffling. Here’s a little 🧵 on weird truths in math.
My favorite example – the Banach-Tarski paradox – shows how you can cut a sphere into a few pieces (well, sets) and then re-assemble the pieces into TWO IDENTICAL copies of the sphere you started with. Image
It sounds so implausible, people often think they've misunderstood. But it's true -- chop into a few "pieces" and reassemble to two *identical* (equal size, equal shape) spheres to what you started with.
Read 39 tweets
Jun 14, 2022
Everyone seems to think it's absurd that large language models (or something similar) could show anything like human intelligence and meaning. But it doesn’t seem so crazy to me. Here's a dissenting 🧵 from cognitive science.
The news, to start, is that this week software engineer @cajundiscordian was placed on leave for violating Google's confidentiality policies, after publicly claiming that a language model was "sentient"
nytimes.com/2022/06/12/tec…
Lemoine has clarified that his claim about the model’s sentience was based on “religious beliefs.” Still, his conversation with the model is really worth reading:
cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-senti…
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(