Schiff calls the report "devastating" (but leaves out for whom).
Seriously, fuck off, Schiff.
Oh lord. This is going to be painful.
Wonder how much Steyer paid Schiff for adding that line?
Mueller agrees he has none.
Ratcliffe goes back to Mueller's answers to Lieu in the last hearing, asks him to clarify his statement and correction.
Mueller won't "speculate on those lines".
The real question is if it's a national security risk to share private polling date with a US STATE DEPARTMENT ASSET.
This is a guy who doesn't seem familiar with his report to begin with, now he's supposed to expound?!
Mueller passes ... and Jackie yields her time back to Schiff.
Mueller: "I don't"
Nunes: "Would it surprise you to learn the Clinton campaign met with her more than Trump's campaign?"
Mueller: "Won't comment."
Nunes: "Did you interview Glenn Simpson?"
Mueller won't answer.
... remember, this is a man who thought he could be president, so logic and sound thinking isn't his strongest suit.
Leads off by laying groundwork that Trump only did this all for money. He committed TREASON for money. That's the argument being made without being said.
And they think people will fall for it.
"Did you find there was no collusion?"
Mueller: "We don't use the word collusion, we use the word... (stammers and can't remember) in any event we decided not to use the word collusion because it has no relevance."
"The term is conspiracy"
That's how @RepAdamSchiff closed out his statement.
A man who has nothing to offer but the hope that no one notices he's full of Schiff.