A quick #rickyrenuncia take before the prerecorded message drops:
Rosselló *should’ve* resigned immediately after publication of the chat portion where he maligned Viverito, never mind the full chat.
By firing SecState Rivera Marín and not immediately nominating a consensus successor, Rosselló pulled the pin on everything that ensued thereafter: the disruptions to tourism, the protests, the loss of credibility in D.C.- everything. 100% on him.
Instead, we have a drawn-out process where Rosselló tries to Northam his way out of a crippling scandal, but ends up completely misreading the mood on the ground.
The best of the bad options before us today remains for Rosselló to announce resignation effective upon confirmation of a consensus SecState nominee, and it would have to be someone untainted by scandal or by belonging to the current administration.
Alternatively, Rosselló could resign effective immediately, which hands the governorship over to AG Wanda Vázquez. That would be problematic.
Vázquez might have committed impeachable offenses of her own, based on the devastating @cpipr report. Under this scenario, protests and disruptions to commerce are highly likely to continue.
Additionally, this administration faces several other federal investigations, as well as prosecutions already underway. Among others:
There are also court matters involving PROMESA, including upcoming oral arguments before SCOTUS on PR’s appeal of the 1st Circuit’s decision in re Aurelius. If SCOTUS upholds Aurelius, PROMESA could be found to be unconstitutional.
Such a decision, coupled with further disruptions, could lead Congress to reassert its full Article IV powers over Puerto Rico’s government. (Governor Mick Mulvaney, anyone?)
By the way, we’re approaching peak Atlantic hurricane season.
All this is to say that this isn’t ending quickly, no matter what happens. (end)
Needless to say, Rosselló staying on and daring the Legislature to impeach is the absolute worst scenario.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With the notable exception of Telemundo, corporate media’s coverage of the horrendous Ohio child rape case largely casts the activist abortion provider as its true victim- rather than the child whose innocence was shattered.
Where is FCCS? Has this child been removed from the home? Is there a dependency case attached to the capital sexual battery?
Why did it take two weeks for the child to be in a situation where she could identify her rapist to law enforcement? Why was she endangered for two weeks after the rape was initially reported?
WATCH: The mother of the Ohio 10/y rape victim tells Telemundo's @MariaVargasPion that the child "is fine", and "everything they say about (Gerson Flores) is a lie."
This portion of a broader interview sheds significant light on the familial dynamics of this case, and further vindicates all skepticism over how the story broke and was handled. We don't even get to this point without the critical work of @MeganFoxWriter and so many others.
This appears to confirm my thesis of a domestic situation wherein the confessed rapist is also the paramour of the victim's mother (other familial relation is possible but less likely). Unfortunately, I saw many such cases while working as a court interpreter.
Some were expecting the Hispanic shift to the GOP to stall after the 2020 presidential election. Trump hitting 38% of Hispanics nationally was seen as a reversion to historical average after Romney's disastrous 27% in 2012. But the opposite has happened.
Why was GOP support among Hispanics so low in the past? In large part, because the GOP relied on the representations of left-wing groups (such as the National Council of La Raza) that immigration is the paramount issue for the recently-created Latino identity.