Inquisitive Bird Profile picture
Jul 26, 2019 21 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Are people with bigger brains smarter (on average)?

Here I will summarize some of the biggest studies which test whether there is a correlation between intelligence and brain size (within modern humans).

Thread.
2) In modern intelligence tests, you give individuals a battery of cognitive tests, testing a wide range of cognitive abilities at once. Then a general factor of intelligence can be estimated, in short "g".

Brain size can be measured with modern brain-imaging technology.
3) To address this question, McDaniel (2005) gathered 37 samples with a total of 1530 people who had been intelligence tested and brain-scanned.

He found that, on average, the correlation between brain size and general intelligence was 0.33.

doi.org/10.1016/j.inte…
4) In a later and larger meta-analysis of 148 samples and more than 8000 individuals, Pietschnig and colleagues (2015) estimate the correlation to be slightly smaller, but still highly significant, r = 0.24.

doi.org/10.1016/j.neub…
5) Quality of tests vary (e.g. Brief tests vs longer and more comprehensive tests).

Gignac & Bates (2017) reanalyzed the studies from the previous meta-analysis and found that the correlations were higher when higher-quality intelligence tests were used.

doi.org/10.1016/j.inte…
6) In fact, this is just a statistical phenomenon. When there is a correlation between two variables, then the better measured the two variables are, the higher the correlation will be.

Poor measurements contain lots of noise which weakens the relationship between the variables.
7) Instead of meta-analyses that pool results from many samples, we can also look at individual high-quality studies.

Ritchie and colleagues (2015) look at many brain variables in a sample of N = 672, but total brain volume and "g" correlated r = 0.31.

https://t.co/y0ENghSE73doi.org/10.1016/j.inte…
8) Dubois and colleagues, in a large sample (N = 884), test if resting-state brain activity correlates with intelligence. It does, but they also report other brain correlates. They find that brain volume correlates r = 0.33 with general intelligence.

https://t.co/sFto5YtXa9royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
9) Recently a study with a massive sample (N = 29,004 individuals) was published.

The correlation between brain volume and general intelligence found was 0.276.

They only used 4 subtests to estimate "g", hence this might even be a slight underestimate.

https://t.co/lmJD6GvP7Udoi.org/10.1016/j.inte…
10) To minimize possible effects of different environments people have lived in, you can look within families. Lee and colleagues find that, of siblings raised in the same family, the sibling with the larger brain tends to be more intelligent.

doi.org/10.1016/j.inte…
11) Another source of evidence comes from "genome-wide association studies." Here you take DNA samples from many individuals and see which gene variants tend to be correlated with some chosen variable of interest.

You can then calculate the genetic overlap two traits have.
12) Genome-wide association studies have now been done for many traits, including intelligence and head circumference (a noisy proxy for brain size).

One such study finds a genetic correlation of 0.31 between intelligence and head circumference.

https://t.co/1OcIjompkHnature.com/articles/s4138…
13) To summarize:

In studies with high-quality measurements, the correlation between brain size and intelligence is roughly r ≈ 0.3.

This is a real, but not a strong relationship. If you want to estimate intelligence, test it directly rather than measuring just brain size.
14) But brain size is just a single variable. Other brain variables also correlate with intelligence. In principle, prediction of intelligence from brain imaging could likely become much stronger if we took multiple brain variables into account at once.

pnas.org/content/early/…
15) Brain size is probably the simplest brain variable to measure, and likely that's why it has been included in many studies. What other brain variables might contribute to differences in intelligence? That's for other research to establish.

Thanks for reading.
@rexjung And yes, it must be frustrating working with expensive research with highly noisy measurements. So I can understand why people would prefer working with structural imaging.
@DumoulinBaptis2 @JamesPsychol For example, take the study in tweet 9). This is likely the most representative. They find estimate of 0.276. If we divide by 0.8 for correction for attentuation (which seems reasonable, perhaps even too generous), we get 0.276/0.8 = 0.345.

So I don't think it's higher than 0.35
@DumoulinBaptis2 @JamesPsychol Find me an individual study (not a meta-analysis) that has a large sample (say, N > 500) and a good intelligence measure that finds correlation above 0.4.

These studies should be plenty if you think the *average* correlation is around 0.4.
@DumoulinBaptis2 @JamesPsychol And this challenge is still open. I'm genuinely interested. Because I've read this literature fairly closely, and from my reading the value is closer to 0.3 than to 0.4.

@joanne_mourched You're right that this is different from establishing causality, as the relationship could be confounded.

A study that attempts to address this as well as they can is the following:

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
New genome-wide association study of brain volume. The genetic correlation between brain volume and intelligence they find is 0.24, quite close to other estimates given in the above thread.

Source:
https://t.co/g1KQs0vatHnature.com/articles/s4146…


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inquisitive Bird

Inquisitive Bird Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Scientific_Bird

Jun 22
Africa's Poor Numbers – new long post published!

In this piece, I critically examine the quality and availability of data in Africa. I argue that much African data is highly unreliable.

In particular, I look at economic data, criminal justice data, and population data. Image
I'm by no means the first to sound alarm about African data quality. It has previously been called "Africa's statistical tragedy". Similarly, a well-known book "Poor Numbers" critically examines Africa's developmental statistics.
There's a lack of proper birth registration, death registration, lack of recent censuses, and much more.

This chart illustrates a composite measure of statistical capacity across the world. As is evident, Africa is the region with the lowest average score. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2
It is not unusual to see claims that intelligent or otherwise able people have fewer children. But is this universal? In the Nordic countries, the opposite seems to the case.

Consider first this data of IQ-fertility for Swedish men born between 1951–1967. Image
The data clearly shows that there is a positive relationship between IQ and fertility. To be fair, this is mostly explained by reduced fertility below average IQ. (Note also that "not tested" have very low fertility, but people who weren't tested tend to have very low IQ).
Basically the same is shown for Norway here (Stanine score is just the IQ scores being distributed into bins). Image
Read 10 tweets
May 13
In my most recent piece, I evaluate whether immigrants tend to assimilate with respect to various social outcomes.

One important outcome is crime. Consider for example the following chart. In Denmark, second-generation immigrants are no less criminal than first-generation. Image
I then went one step further and considered whether differences between different immigrant groups converge. Again, Denmark offers excellent data by nation-of-origin.

There is a remarkable persistence in crime rates between first- and second generation (correlation = 0.9). Image
It's not just in Denmark. Though Sweden does not report them at the national level, we see the same strong persistence for region-of-origin. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 9
The Assimilation Myth — new post published!

Using data from a variety of countries, I show that ethnic disparities in human capital, economic performance, crime and cultural values tend to show substantial persistence across generations. Image
First, I consider whether immigrants assimilate in terms of human capital.

Systematic PISA comparisons show that even second-generation immigrants tend to score much more similar to their parents' country-of-origin than the country they were born and raised in. Image
In fact, even if you control for school and socioeconomic status, students whose parents come from high-scoring countries still tend to score higher on tests. This indicates a strong degree of persistence.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 9
In a new article, I argue that, contrary to common belief, the American story is not one of widespread and rapid immigrant assimilation. The "melting pot" metaphor is largely a fiction. Image
It is often said that, during the Age of Mass Migration, European migrants rapidly assimilated.

This is mistaken. Not only did large shares of European immigrants return because they couldn't integrate, disparities between European groups did *not* rapidly disappear. Image
Another example of supposed great assimilation are today's Asian immigrants.

But their success can largely be attributed to pre-arrival characteristics due to extreme immigration selectivity, not to characteristics acquired after arrival due to assimilation. Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 28
The weird thing about articles like this is that if they had asked a demographer, they would've known that there's a consensus that immigration cannot solve the problem of ageing populations.
More precisely, the amount of immigration necessary to keep the population age down is extreme and unprecedented. Infrastructure wouldn't even be able to keep up.
Some right-wingers will post the image of this old 2000 UN report called "Replacement Migration" without reading it. It actually concludes replacement migration cannot realistically solve population ageing. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(