Shane Harris Profile picture
Jul 30, 2019 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
New: My profile of CIA Director Gina Haspel. More than two dozen interviews in two countries. washingtonpost.com/world/national… Some highlights:
Haspel has often joined DNI Dan Coats and a career senior intel official for Trump's intelligence briefing. They boil down a few key points that they think Trump absolutely needs to know. Haspel is careful not to contradict the president or argue with him about his opinions.
That's illustrative of how Haspel has managed her relationship with the president; which is to say, she has focused more on representing her agency and doing her job than cultivating a close relationship w/ Trump, as Mike Pompeo did when he ran the CIA.
Haspel has kept an unusually low profile. She has given no on-the-record interviews to journalists, and she did not talk to me for this profile. She has given very few public speeches. After two of them, at universities, she took no questions from the press.
After becoming director in May 2018, Haspel, who majored in journalism, confided to a colleague that there were only two outcomes from giving an interview to a reporter: “Bad and terrible.”
In addition to being very protective of the CIA, she cherishes the exceptionally close bond between the Americans and the British. Haspel did two tours as chief of station London. Her (many) fans at MI6 call her "the honorary U.K. desk officer."
Many who know Haspel volunteered that she has no ego. “I’d go into her office and there was a big poster of Johnny Cash” — Haspel is a lifelong fan — “but I didn’t see any photos of herself,” said Hank Crumpton, a former senior CIA officer who hired Haspel as his deputy.
“She wasn’t all business. But she was mostly business,” said a former British intelligence official. Haspel was not the type to head to the pub with co-workers, he said. “Gina was not a beer drinker.”
In 2016, Haspel was tapped to become deputy director to Mike Pompeo. She had five days to pack up her things in London and come home, a friend said. People in London and Langley were relieved. They saw her as a welcome buffer against Trump but also, potentially, Pompeo.
Pompeo, a GOP congressman, had no background in intelligence and was best known as one of the hardest chargers on the Benghazi committee. But Haspel quickly formed a working relationship with Pompeo that suited both their priorities and mostly shielded the CIA.
Some at CIA faulted Pompeo for acting more as a political ally to the president, particularly when he implied that Iran was not abiding by an international agreement to halt development of nuclear weapons.
“When Pompeo went out and spoke publicly, he was doing everything he could to put no space between himself and the president, even to the point of saying things that were inconsistent with what the CIA believed,” a former senior official said.
Haspel has steered clear of any policy positions. “I think the biggest fear when Trump was elected was the agency would be used in a political manner,” said one former U.S. intelligence official. “Gina understands: We don’t run policy. We advise.”
People who know Haspel said she's committed to her mission and keeping a low profile.“I don’t think you’ll see any innovation while Trump is president,” said a former CIA analyst. “They’ll be holding on to what’s sacred and doing what they can to make it through unscathed.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shane Harris

Shane Harris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaneharris

Jun 6, 2023
EXCLUSIVE: U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline, months before the bombing. washingtonpost.com/national-secur… By me and @smekhennet
Some of the key findings of our reporting:

In June 2022, a European intelligence service passed the CIA detailed reporting about a plan by Ukraine's special operations forces to sabotage Nord Stream. The source was an individual in Ukraine.
The information was specific: 6 special ops personnel would rent a boat, and, suing a submersible vehicle and deep-water diving equipment, damage or destroy the pipeline and leave undetected.
Read 8 tweets
May 13, 2023
EXCLUSIVE: Alleged leaker Jack Teixeira fixated on guns and envisioned ‘race war’ washingtonpost.com/national-secur… Videos and chat logs reveal preparations for a violent social conflict, his racist thinking and a deep suspicion of the gov't he served. By me, @samueloakford, and @chrisd9r
In a lengthy interview, a close personal friend of Teixeira said he wanted to "shoot up" his high school and praised mass killings such as the attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019, which left 51 people dead. (Video by @JonGerberg and @ntabrizy.)
Teixeira shared hundreds of classified documents with his young admirers to reveal secret knowledge he believed the government had hidden from ordinary people. “He had quite a few conspiratorial beliefs,” a close friend said, including "how the government kills their own people."
Read 9 tweets
Dec 1, 2022
NEW: The Iranian government has stepped up its efforts to kidnap and kill government officials, activists, and journalists in the U.S. and around the world. Officials now fear a direct confrontation with Tehran. washingtonpost.com/world/2022/12/… By me, @smekhennet, and @yjtorbati.
We spoke to targets of Iran's plots, who've been warned to limit their travel and have suffered relentless harassment from Tehran. Our story is the result of months of reporting, interviews with more than a dozen government officials, and access to previously unreported documents
The Iranian plotting has reached a fever pitch in the U.K., which recently submitted a "blue notice" to Interpol alleging a suspected member of the Quds Force had helped to arrange attempted “lethal operations against Iranian dissidents in the U.K. in 2020.”
Read 6 tweets
Aug 16, 2022
Months of reporting. More than three dozen interviews with senior U.S., Ukrainian, European and NATO officials. Here's our account of the road to war in Ukraine. washingtonpost.com/national-secur… W/ @karendeyoung1, @ikhurshudyan, @AshleyRParker, and @LizSly
Some of the key takeaways of our reporting:

1.) Last year, the United States intelligence community penetrated multiple points of Russia’s political leadership, spying apparatus and military, and found Vladimir Putin preparing for a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
2.) Every decision on arming Ukraine was predicated on not giving Russia a reason to attack the United States and NATO.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 12, 2022
Well before the FBI searched Trump's home for classified information concerning nuclear weapons, officials worried that as an ex-president Trump could pose a unique national security risk. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Experts then said Trump checks the boxes of a classic counterintelligence risk: He is deeply in debt and angry at the U.S. government, particularly the “deep state” conspiracy he claimed tried to stop him from winning the White House in 2016 and robbed him of reelection.
Experts raised those fears before we understood the lengths Trump and his allies would go to attempt to overturn the 2020 election. “Anyone who is disgruntled, dissatisfied or aggrieved is a risk of disclosing classified information," @DavidPriess noted.
Read 6 tweets
May 10, 2022
Heated exchange between Sen. King and DIA director Gen. Berrier on whether the intel community failed to predict/understand Ukraine's will to fight. Berrier: "there was never an intelligence community assessment that said the Ukrainians lack the will to fight."
King: "The assessment was Ukraine would be overrun in a matter of weeks. That was grossly wrong."

Berrier: "Grossly wrong. But not not not a question of will to fight...we assessed their capacity to face the size of the Russian forces that were massed on their border...
...was going to be very difficult for them."

King: "Well, all I'm saying is the intelligence community needs to do a better job on this issue."

Berrier: "I think the intelligence community did a great job on this issue, Senator."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(