Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
Jul 30, 2019 11 tweets 6 min read Read on X
BREAKING: A federal judge DISMISSES the DNC's lawsuit against the Trump campaign, Russia, WikiLeaks et al. with prejudice, and DENIES the Trump campaign's sanctions motion.

Background on the lawsuit, via @CourthouseNews.

Opinion soon.
@CourthouseNews Judge Koeltl says the "primary wrongdoer" in the hacking was Russia, which he said is immune under the FSIA.

Here was the link to the background on the filing of the suit: courthousenews.com/dnc-suit-accus…

Developing story soon.
@CourthouseNews As for the "second-level participants" in the alleged racketeering scheme, Koeltl says that they are shielded by the First Amendment from liability related to disseminating the stolen emails.
@CourthouseNews Read the 81-page ruling in full here: documentcloud.org/documents/6225…

Story in a bit.
@CourthouseNews Judge Koeltl, a Clinton appointee, cited the Pentagon Papers case in finding that there could not be liability for the publication of stolen materials.
@CourthouseNews "If @WikiLeaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC’s political financial and voter-engagement strategies simply because the DNC labels them 'secret' and trade secrets, then so could any newspaper or other media outlet."

-Judge Koeltl on 1A concerns
@CourthouseNews @wikileaks DEVELOPING story for @CourthouseNews on the ruling dismissing the DNC's suit. Still awaiting comment from many of the parties, and a new update is in the editing queue.

Standby for more. courthousenews.com/dnc-loses-rack…
DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson just sent me this statement.

Story will be updated soon.
From Roger Stone’s attorney, with echoes of George Papadopoulos’s attorney’s statement.
This statement from Trump is misleading.

The judge did not say the DNC case was “entirely divorced” from the facts. He wrote that the DNC’s claim that Trump campaign and Russia conspired in the hack itself was “entirely divorced” from what they alleged in the lawsuit.
The distinction is subtle but important.

Judges don’t decide the facts on a motion to dismiss. They rule on whether the allegations represent a plausible claim.

Final updates coming up soon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Oct 17
A hearing has begun over the enforcement of a federal judge's order protecting journalists, protesters and clergy from attacks by ICE agents.

Listening live.
Judge Ellis specifying the type of testimony that she wants to hear on Monday:

"I want somebody with knowledge from ICE and somebody with knowledge from Customs and Border Patrol."
The plaintiff's attorney wants Judge Ellis to order someone within the chain of command of Operation Midway Blitz.

Judge Ellis: "I hear you. ... I at my fingertips can't tell you who's in the chain of command, who has the most knowledge and who is the best witness."
Read 8 tweets
Oct 14
Extraordinary NYT story:

Trump’s DOJ pressured out another US Attorney in WESTERN Virginia for finding that a grand jury probe his bosses demanded was unwarranted.

They wanted a case discrediting the Russia probe — evidence be damned. nytimes.com/2025/10/14/us/…
The ex-U.S. Attorney was a GOP state legislator before taking on that role.

The case "appears to have petered out, at least for the moment," per the Times.
Note: The U.S. Attorney's forcing out happened in August.

The NYT exposed backstory today.

As for the underlying probe, "several people familiar with the work described it as essentially over," per the Times.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 10
Good morning from Greenbelt, Md.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys will argue in federal court for his release from immigration detention. Now feds want to send Abrego to Ghana.

Reporting live.
"All rise."

Court is now in session.

The attorneys register their appearances.
The government's only witness today is John Schultz, the deputy assistant director from ICE's Enforcement Removal Operations.

He's sworn in.
Read 47 tweets
Oct 6
Trump tried to end-run a federal judge's ruling blocking the deployment of the Oregon National Guard by sending the *California* National Guard to Portland.

A hearing is about to start for a judge to decide whether to block him again.

Background allrisenews.com/p/constitution…Image
FYI:

The public dial-in line has not been operative since the start time of the hearing: 7 p.m. PT / 10 p.m. ET.

It's unclear whether the proceedings were delayed or the remote access system is down.
We're about to begin.

Judge Immergut is presiding.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 13
The final day of the Posse Comitatus Act trial against the Trump admin is underway.

Recap a general's damaging — then walked back — testimony against the admin on @Allrisenews.

Inside: A video breakdown with on @MeidasTouch's Legal AF.

allrisenews.com/p/general-scot…
At the start of DOJ lawyer Eric Hamilton's arguments, Senior U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer already gives him a hot bench.

Hamilton's arguments: the Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute with no civil application.

Breyer peppers him with questions.
Breyer: What is the remedy? ... Let's assume [the President] violates the terms of the Posse Comitatus Act. ... The facts aren't in dispute. They're disputed in this case. ... What then is the remedy?"

DOJ: There is no civil remedy.
Read 26 tweets
Jun 17
Trump’s appeal of a federal judge’s ruling finding his federalization of the National Guard illegal heads to court minutes from now (noon Pacific Time).

Follow along for analysis, and watch live on the court’s YouTube page.

Background on the lower court's ruling allrisenews.com/p/trump-troops…
The Ninth Circuit arguments will be streamed on the court's YouTube page here.
The hearing has begun.

DOJ's senior counsel Brett Shumate argues first.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(