This is certainly an interesting explanation for Epstein's interest in cultivating relationships with scientists: nytimes.com/2019/07/31/bus…
"Mr. Epstein was willing to finance research that others viewed as bizarre. He told one scientist that he was bankrolling efforts to identify a mysterious particle that might trigger the feeling that someone is watching you."
"It was not a secret."
Multiple people knew about Epstein's ambitions to use his ranch in New Mexico as a kind of baby farm where women would be inseminated and give birth to his offspring.
Of the many horrifying things about the Jeffrey Epstein story is this simple fact: He did it all in plain sight.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s been plenty of armchair diagnosis about narcissistic personality disorders as well as speculation about leverage Trump could, possibly, have wanted to exercise with foreign states with whom he wants to do business deals (ie Saudi Arabia).
In his mind, the best defense is the best offense. And, given his background in the unregulated and ruthless world of NY real estate, it might appear that he assumes (not necessarily wrongly) that everyone else is playing dirty, so he needs to play dirtier to gain the advantage.
2. The last time I recall so much live coverage of someone on the move was when the Queen’s coffin was being transported from Westminster Abbey to her final burial at St George’s Chapel in Windsor. And the time before that was the police chase of OJ Simpson.
3. TV shots of the mansion, to which he will jet home tonight, only serve as a reminder that even if a jury finds him guilty of the charges, even if he were sentenced to prison, upon his return his lifestyle will remain largely unaffected.
1. Who does Donald Trump's indictment help? @jaredkushner
The noise around Trump, again, drowns out a new report of his son-in-law's Middle East dealings
THREAD
2. Yes, Trump became the first American president to be indicted on criminal charges.
But, in the midst of the brouhaha as that story broke, The New York Times published an important news story about Jared Kushner’s investments in the Middle East.
3. Kushner, remember, is being investigated by Congress for the appearance of quid-pro-quo policy-making in the region while he was in the White House.
The British press play fast and loose with the truth, they are transactional and mean-spirited, and they’ve been known to break the law to get a story. All of which is deplorable.
The big conundrum: Their readers kind of know all this.
2. I watched Michael Cohen's U-turn in real time, as he slowly began to realize that his former boss, “the big guy” was not going to do anything to protect Michael as the Feds closed in.
3. Michael Cohen also helped Trump get elected against the wishes of the Trump kids. They weren't exactly thanked.
1. Ahead of TikTok’s CEO testifying to Congress Thursday around the debate that TikTok’s ownership by the Chinese Government is a security risk, I asked my 20-year-old son who has 28.9k followers for his views on whether TikTok should be banned.
2. My son’s response: “Mom, 1. Unless you have a really interesting job - and I mean REALLY interesting, like Director of the CIA - your data is more boring, than useful. 2. Mark Zuckerberg already has all of the data on your phone”
3. Commerce secretary, Gina Raimondo has said that banning it would likely mean losing the support of voters aged 35 and under.